Now why would this be?
http://www.betterhum...ID=2004-05-31-2
If we're told that caloric intake restriction lengthens lifespan, then
how does that relate to this new finding? Is it possible that caloric
intake has to be judged relative to metabolic rate? (ie. the faster
your metabolism relative to your caloric intake, the longer you live?)
But I thought metabolic rate was dependent on caloric intake, and
hence the utility for caloric intake restriction, due to its effect on
reducing metabolic rate. Or wrong?
What's the real story here? It's getting conflicting and confusing.