Printable Version of Topic

Click here to view this topic in its original format

ImmInst.org Forums _ Stem Cells _ Stem Cell Research News

Posted by: Cyto Sep 25 2002, 09:43 PM

_________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________
Stem Cell Research News
Current Stem Cell News
_________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________

:::Requirements:::
(1). You will be limited to presenting information about stem cells.
(2). SCRN::IMMINST WILL NOT tolerate ANY swearing. People who fail to understand this will be BLACKLISTED from posting in the thread!
(3). Let us keep from repeating a post, look at above posts of previous days to make sure you don't post the same information, please.
________________________________________________________________________________
_____________


Begin News Review...

-=WHICH IS BETTER?=-

One "Hot Topic" of stem cells, in general, is the ESC vs. Adult SC.

Starting with ESC we know already that these totipotent cells can form anything if in the right Microenviroment. The microenviroment is the surrounding tissue, of the stem cell, which has been found to have ~4000 genes transcribing, which has an influence on the differentiation of the stem cell. (i.e. Myeloid precursors, B and T Lymphocites or coritcal SCs can specify in neural cells)

So the regenerative benefits of these cells are, for the most part, straight forward. There is one problem though which is keeping the mass-produced ESC from occurring genetic instability .

Now papers have been published stating that we should turn to adult stem cells and thus let the political "pro-life" agenda win. It doesn't directly state this in research papers but political workers can bend it to their agenda.

The most recent research article that casts more doubt on the adult stem cells, was reported on September 5, 2002. The experiment was conducted in Standford University and the results were: they could not coax the adult blood stem cell to form other tissues in the body.

"This is the first time somebody injected a single adult stem cell and showed that it made only blood." said Weissman, who is the lead author of this study. His study, in my point of view, illustrates that adult stem cells are mostly at the multipotent stage of specificity. Thusly it would be a tremendous effort to try and reprogram the cell just to make some cells return to a primitive stage. *there is a post down below that talks about doing this though*

What Weissman et al. did was: knock out mice bone marrow by irradiation then they took a single adult stem cell and injected it in the bone. They gave the stem cell a GFP tag or a green fluorescence protein tag which glows under a microscope (darkfield?), this would help track progeny later on when mitosis would occur.

After several weeks the stem cell (one) had repopulated the blood and immune cells of the mice. Then the researchers searched through 15 million cells all over the body they found one brain cell and seven liver cells that were green under the scope.

Now, the one brain and seven liver cells could of been an original cell fusing with the progeny of the stem cell (http://www.cellpress.com has reported this to happen) OR it could of been the adult stem cell somehow had a massive regression of its gene array due to the influence of the microenviroments. The latter is very hard to believe.

Another experiment irradiated some mice intestines and put in one adult stem cell with the GFP to see if it would repopulate the intestines. After the intestines were reconstructed none of the green progeny showed up anywhere.

There are still researchers in the field that I hold respect for saying that they have seen adult stem cells form all types but I need extreme details. This is certainly not a game but quite a few professors are advocating that ESC are not needed. Overall, my two cents that I am sure a lot of people say too: Wait for the research!!! *look at the posts down, there is one on how miss-classification of stem cells are to blame*
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 25 2002, 10:18 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=THERAPY=-
ReNeuron has licensed from the Australia Amrad Corp the patent covering cell immortalitization. They were going to start the human trials to inject embryonic stem cells into Parkinson's patients but they found that the cells loose genetic stability after being recreated many times. Now they plan to start at 2004 for the human trials. During this time they are going to continue work on the genetic stability problem. They have been working on it for around 2 years sofar.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 8 2002, 07:57 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTOR=-

On October 7th:
"We isolated for the first time the stem cell in the brain that is responsible for the production of new nerve cells," Bartlett said. "This has allowed us to start to identify how this stem cell can be regulated to produce new nerve cells in our brains."

"By stimulating the production of new nerve cells in the brain, normal brain function — such as memory formation — could be enhanced," said Bartlett.

"It could also allow for the replacement of nerve cells lost because of a stroke, trauma or neurodegenerative ailments such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease or motor neurone disease."

The place:
University of Queensland, Professor Perry Bartlett

Now:::
Bartlett will lead a group of researchers in setting up a cell-sorting facility for neuroscience and biotechnology after receiving a 500,000 dollar (260,000 dollar US) Australian government grant.

It will be very interesting to start looking at what nuclear factors can be contributing to this ability of stimulating mitosis. Research efforts of ReNeuron, Australia Amrad Corp, and Bartlett shows manipulating stem cells can be a frustrating job as well as rewarding.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 19 2002, 09:33 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS=-



QUOTE
More than a year ago, President Bush restricted all federally funded scientists to use 78 existing stem-cell lines for their research.


QUOTE
Bush: Leading scientists tell me research on these 60 lines has great promise that could lead to breakthrough therapies and cures.  This allows us to explore the promise and potential of stem cell research without crossing a fundamental moral line..."


Did they also tell you that most of the lines have mice stem cells mixed in with them making it harder to characterize and know which ones are which? Leading researchers, yea right.

QUOTE
Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., is one who supports tough restrictions on stem-cell use. A bill sponsored by Brownback would criminalize the use of any embryonic stem cells or stem cell-derived therapies obtained through human cloning.

"New advances in adult stem-cell research, being reported almost weekly, show more promise than destructive embryo research," Brownback said during a speech on the Senate floor last year.


Ok...

QUOTE
Bush: "Even the most noble ends do not justify the means."


So Bush, what do you think about the christian crusades, you know, killing all those people? So should we be outlawing christians? History shows they can be deadly.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Jan 3 2003, 05:57 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-

Ask and ye shall recieve wink.gif

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&ncid=585&e=2&cid=585&u=/nm/20030103/sc_nm/health_heart_stemcells_dc
Thu Jan 2, 7:07 PM ET Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) - Stem cells may help patients recover from heart attacks by triggering new cell growth in damaged tissue, scientists said on Friday.

Stem cells are so-called master cells that can develop into various tissues in the body and using them to repair damaged hearts is a hot area of medical research.

Two teams of doctors from Germany and Hong Kong reported promising results after transplanting stem cells extracted from bone marrow into heart muscle, although they said more research was needed on the procedure.

The aim of the procedure is to stimulate blood vessel growth in areas without sufficient blood supply, a process known as angiogenesis. It could eventually offer hope to patients with serious coronary heart disease and those unable to undergo bypass surgery.

Professor Gustav Steinhoff and colleagues from the University of Rostock, Germany, injected stem cells into six patients' hearts and found five had strikingly improved blood flow, suggesting the cells may have generated growth in damaged areas.

All patients, however, also underwent conventional bypass surgery. Steinhoff wrote in The Lancet medical journal that further clinical studies were needed to clarify the role of stem cells in the regeneration process.

A second group of scientists led by Hung-Fat Tse from the University of Hong Kong treated eight patients with stem cells from their own bone marrow and also observed an improvement in blood flow to the heart.

Last April, Australian surgeons carried out the world's first trial using bone-marrow stem cells to repair heart damage in a 74-year-old man.

Researchers hope to use stem cells to treat a variety of illnesses, including heart disease, brain disorders and diabetes.

The work is controversial because of the ethical issues surrounding the use of embryonic and fetal cells. Using adult stem cells culled from bone marrow solves that dilemma -- as well as potential problems with tissue rejection.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Jan 5 2003, 08:50 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-

http://www.nature.com/nsu/021230/021230-2.html Shared protein patrols cell proliferation.
30 December 2002
KENDALL POWELL

Stem cell transplants could risk seeding cancers.
© GettyImages

The same protein may control the proliferation of stem cells and cancer cells, according to a new study1.

The finding will help researchers understand how both types of cell can divide indefinitely. But it also highlights concerns that stem cell transplants could run the risk of seeding cancers.

The discovery should help scientists manipulate stem cells to give an unlimited source for use in medicine, says Robert Tsai at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke in Bethesda, Maryland. The hope is that stem-cell therapy will one day be able to replace or repair any damaged tissue in the body.

To do this, scientists must be able to control proliferation so that transplanted cells don't become cancerous. More researchers should be "paying attention to the molecular events that take part in the earliest stages of stem cells," says Julia Polak, director of Imperial College London's Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Centre.

The body normally maintains the ability of certain stem cells to renew themselves so that they can replace cells that wear out. Cancer cells hijack this property to transform into dividing tumours. The molecular link now established between stem cells and cancer cells "is something novel, as far as I'm aware," says Polak.

Tsai, and his colleague Ronald McKay showed that the protein nucleostemin is abundant in self-renewing cells such as mouse embryonic and neural stem cells and several human cancer cell lines.

By contrast, the protein is scarce in cells that have grown into a mature cell type and can no longer divide. Increasing or knocking down the level of nucleostemin in neural stem cells and cancer-like cells in the lab reduced their proliferation.

Although the exact function of nucleostemin is not yet known, it appears to behave like a molecular switch to control cell division. The researchers also showed that it binds to a protein called p53, which regulates cell proliferation and is implicated in many cancers.


References
Tsai, R. Y. L. & McKay, R. D. G. A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferation in stem cells and cancer cells. Genes & Development, 16, 2991 - 3003, (2002). |http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/content/abstract/16/23/2991|


© Nature News Service / Macmillan Magazines Ltd 2002
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 7 2003, 05:26 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMPATABILITY ISSUE=-

Male donors transferred into females, and even better, I don't find anything saying they were related through genetics.

They found that the bone marrow stem cells differentiated into neurons in the women (detected the Y chromosome).

I haven't gotten a hold of the actual research paper but this provides another positive outlook for the regenerative capabilities of stem cells (mesenchymals). Also lets not forget the compatabilty issues!!!

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=100007425&Page=1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 10 2003, 08:56 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-

Scientists working with human embryonic stem cells have for the first time successfully spliced out individual genes from the medically promising but politically contentious cells and substituted different genes in their place.

The work is a step toward the biomedical goal of being able to rebuild or regenerate parts of the human body by transplanting either stem cells or tissues grown from stem cells into patients, scientists said. Precise genetic changes in those formative human cells might enhance their therapeutic potential or make them more compatible with patients' immune systems.


Some good news to my ears, along with the bone marrow transplants (above).
------------------------------------------

[>] http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A49339-2003Feb9.html

[>] http://www.msnbc.com/news/870923.asp#BODY

[>]http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml;jsessionid=5KMRIHHQKQGXFR3FQLMSFEWHUWBNQIV0?sectionId=2&contentType=Articles&action=view&contentItem=100224863&Page=1
--------------------------------------------

There are some points which do not apply to us:

QUOTE
Some scientists suggested the success might someday make it unnecessary to pursue "therapeutic cloning," in which cloned embryos would be created as a source of therapeutic tissues that match the genetic signature of the patient.


This is only for the people who have had a major illness or need something "right now" so they can avoid having to traumatize the patient even more by taking some major amounts of cells for culture.

For us is would still be: Utilize the nuclear transport technique by sucking out the unknown nucleus then put yours in. Course these nuclei are from you and would of underwent the knockout and replacement, to increase compentency (whatever gene replacements they may be). Emit the electrical discharge to make the plasma membrane close. "Trick" into dividing and have your culturing equipment ready.
It is understood that this ability to selectivly knock out genes and replace them with potentialy "better" ones can lead to increasing compatability of a cell line.
The problem I have is that it will take time to make sure a extreamly high percentage of the cells are able to be assimilated into other systems. When you could just clone your own with some of your epithelial cells, for example. Now, we do need to understand what genetic markers can "backstep" cells to be pluripotent, this could be useful for us. But we would still have mesenchymals as a backup. There is a really cool gene database at the SAGE KE site in the www.sciencemag.org website, $79 for the subscription.

-----------------------------------------------

If you look to the link above about the bone marrow transplants it is interesting to find that the male bone marrow works for the female sex. I think it is safe to conclude that there is some "point" where the stem cells can still assimilate into other systems.

Interesting stuff and makes me feel better. The companies like: Stemsource, Vitacord, cryocord etc REFUSED to take my blood for genetic storage. With that option out of the way it will be necessary to further the understanding of what genes can "backstep cells" and im not talking about increasing the cells lifespan but for the pluripotency. The stem cell gene knockout and replacement techniques will aid in replacing 'X' genes and increasing competency.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 18 2003, 03:41 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-

Revisiting Nucleostemin, what is it?

Even though the topic about a nuclearprotein called nucleostemin, which has a direct influence on CNS (central nervous system) development, already has been posted I would like to revisit this interesting discovery...

As pluripotent nSCs transistion to a more differentiated phase of operation (cortical stem cells to neural stem cells, as example) the control over that specific cell lineage downregulates to the point where nucleostemin is no longer used as activly (hematopoietic is nucleostemin negative). So Tsai and McKay, the researchers, wanted to see what would happen if the nucleostemin was overexpressed and if mutations would occur in the "N-terminal and GTP-binding domains of the nucleostemin protein (2002)."

When overexpression of the nucleostemin gene occured it would decrease the diversification potentials of the stem cell. Looking at it closer, when the cell would try to replicate the DNA for division it would cease and the DNA wouldn't enter into the nucleostemin aggregates (concentrations). There would also be frequent cell deaths associated with this which could be triggered by the N-terminal interactions with p53, which regulates cell death - or the fact that if DNA replication commence correctly, then cell death will occur. This occurance also explains why there is a decrease in nucleostemin expression before Prophase, so things dont screw up. When the N-terminal domain is mutated cell death occurs since it can't interact with p53 and when the GTP-binding domain is mutated then aggregation occurs in random places - disrupting chromatin.

The regulation of this nucleostemin seems to be controlled by its GTP-binding domain but it is not known if being bound to GPT activates it or not.

Overall this protein has control over the cell death mainly in its, as Tsai and McKay put it, "primitive form (2002)." It is due to the binding with the p53 genome killswitch and if the GTP-domain is mutated, chances are, the cell will arrest and destruct.
A very interesting protein that becomes downregulated as the cell differentiates thus allowing the possibility of mutant death to occur. This sure increases quality of what cells actually are put to work in your body.

Cited Source:

Tsai, R. & McKay R. (2002) A nucleolar mechanism controlling cell proliferationin stem cells and cancer cells. Genes & Development, 16, 2991-3003.



_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 25 2003, 11:24 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTOR=-

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=101048467&Page=1 <-Link Here)

New technology (unknown growth factor due to patent pending) developed at the U.S. Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory allows for pluripotent stem cells to be easily accessed from your own bloodstream. Once exposed to other growth factors they differentiated into nerve, liver and immune cells. The research will be posted later in http://www.pnas.org/.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Aegist Feb 26 2003, 04:51 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=THERAPY=-

Would it be possible, and would it be of any use, to remove a few Adult Stem Cells from a patient, of the type that that patient actually needs, exposing those stem cells to Telomerase, Culturing the cells for numerous doublings, then putting the stem cells back into the body?

This way we don't need to Totipotent cells, we only need to grab the multi- or even unipotent stem cells, as we need them, from where we need them.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 26 2003, 06:16 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=THERAPY=-

Since I want to maintain a biological body during life extension I do not want to take chances. To me, tinkering with the telomerase production is asking for our two forms of repair (GG-NER and TC-NER) to fail us and generate potentially cancerous cells. And we all know that cancer can evolve into some nasty webs of protein confusion. So trying to figure out how to "cure" the multiples of cancer would be time consuming and counter productive. Don't get me wrong, our two methods do work most of the time at fixing pyrimidine dimers (etc) but, lets not take the chance. Also, now that I think about it - a build up of mutations can also occur through mitotic replication.

As for the totipotent and pluripotent the only advantage one has over the other is toti can make fetal mass. Mesenchymals (pluri), which are found in the bone marrow can differ into anything so far - this is something like I want. And support that mesen's are still able to be compatible with different sexes and bloodlines is in an above post on bone marrow transplant section.

But this new growth factor seems to hold a lot of promise and I won't have to get the mesen's from my bone. I wonder if they can push it further to form other cell types...

It really aggravates me not knowing what composes these growth factors! Then I could find the gene array this functions with.

Your point is valid Another God, but I can't afford to take the chance. Unless we can improve upon the XP array for N.E.R. There are models we could try to copy but this would be something to pursue after we have secured several hundred years of life.

For quite some time I have been researching (looking in research articles) the myriads of core promoter elements and the interactions that occur during transcription, this will lead to better control of the stem cell genome and maybe increasing the sensitivity of GG-NER and TC-NER. But I have to have a strong and grandeur understanding, so bear with me. Its going to be an interesting future.

PS:The procedure you speak of sounds costly though, taking the cells from the patient may add more strain and the culturing can take months.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Mind Feb 27 2003, 02:57 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTOR=-



Here is some additional information regarding blood stem cells from the Biochip Technology Center at Argonne National Laboratory:

QUOTE
The cells "are pretty rare ... but they can be expanded very easily," he said. The technique is "very simple," and many laboratories will be able to use it and move this field forward, he said.


QUOTE
Adding various growth factors, Huberman's group was able to get the monocyte stem cells to express markers that indicated they had become brain cells, liver cells and skin cells. They also succeeded in getting the stem cells to transform into cells of the immune system and cells lining blood vessels, he said.


QUOTE
In addition, the monocyte cells can be frozen and still retain their vitality. This indicates the cells could be obtained from frozen blood and used to treat patients. "If an individual donates blood, we can freeze it and later isolate these stem cells and hopefully use it in the future to help people," he said.


Here is a link to the full article http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20030224-063913-9814r
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 28 2003, 10:52 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS=-

On top of the http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=44&t=921&st=0&#entry7137 I would also like to point out this other new bit:

On Feb 27 the House of Representatives voted to ban ALL forms of human cloning in a 241 to 155 result. EVERYTHING that has to do with ANY form of human cloning inside america will result in a $1,000,000 fine and 10 years in prison! Posting this unfortunate event is against the rules in this forum but we must also promote awareness of events in which will hinder results. In order to stay in america now it is a matter of looking into the Argonne National Laboratory results.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Feb 28 2003, 11:36 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CONTROLLING STEM CELLS=-

Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory have found how to control phenotypic occurrences in the genome. They have utilized RNA interference to actually tune genes for expression. These settings can be in the traditional "low" "medium" "high".

How does this help us? We can potentially control stem cells and how they differentiate. This may be done through inhibiting a transcript from reaching the Ribosome which could result in opening up the differentiation potential. Hence: keeping inhibitive proteins from further "deactivating certain potentials." This could be considered not really taking care of the problem "for good."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 4 2003, 06:06 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=TOOLS TO STUDY STEM CELLS=-

3/3/2003 -- Researchers at the University of Rochester have created the highest resolution optical image ever, revealing structures as small as carbon nanotubes just a few billionths of an inch across. The new method should open the door to previously inaccessible chemical and structural information in samples as small as the proteins embedded in a cell's membrane. The research appears in today's issue of Physical Review Letters.

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?sectionId=2&contentType=Articles&action=view&contentItem=101307471&Page=1

Sofar they have a resolution of 20 nanometers but as the gold tip gets sharper and they improve the endurance of the material, it will get clearer. In other words: we can get closer to getting pictures that confirm different assemblies of the pre-initiation complex, craft better binding proteins(as well as others) and there is always more. But this will better our pursuit to control Eukaryotic Gene Regulation.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 5 2003, 11:39 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=TOOLS TO STUDY STEM CELLS=-

3/5/2003 -- University of Chicago physicists can use multiple beams of light to selectively sort microscopic particles, biological cells and large molecules, they will report Wednesday, March 5, at the American Physical Society meeting in Austin, Texas.

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=101325749&Page=1

QUOTE
Optical fractionation is based on holographic optical tweezers technology. HOT technology uses forces exerted by strongly focused, computer-generated holograms to create very large arrays of discrete optical traps. Each trap is capable of suspending a microscopic object motionless in three dimensions.


QUOTE
"It's a new approach based on very old principles," Grier said. "If you've seen the tiles on a Spanish roof that direct rainwater, in some respects this operates on the same principle."


QUOTE
The potential applications of optical fractionation include routine medical testing, pharmaceutical research and the development of entirely new biotechnological markets.


QUOTE
Optical fractionation is complementary to and more flexible than existing techniques such as gel electrophoresis, Grier said. Almost all of the existing techniques involve a competition between two forces that act in opposite directions along the same axis. In the case of gel electrophoresis, an applied electric field drives objects such as DNA in one direction, while the viscous drag of the gel opposes that motion.


QUOTE
One also can adjust the laser wavelength and power and the trap geometry, allowing the traps to instantly sort objects ranging in size from less than 100 nanometers (the size of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus), to near 100 micrometers (the diameter of a human hair).

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: sixfootbrit Mar 6 2003, 09:06 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-

Combine the above two technologies and you have the worlds first 3 dimensional nanoscale manipulation device. The strides made in optical microscopes are overcoming the light wavelength "limitation"
Ah!! are we ready for this? [unsure]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 7 2003, 12:19 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-

The culture lag will always exist if something "violates" common beliefs. We do need the improvements so the molecular biologists, nanotech, chemical engineers (etc) can freely establish hypotheses and verify without having to worry about technology to provide an answer.

If anyone would like to futher this problem of culture lag, do so outside this thread.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 10 2003, 10:44 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS CORRECTED=-

This is from the meeting when The House of Republicans decided to pass a ban on both therepeutic and human cloning.

Rep. Dave Weldon, R-Fla., author of H.R. 534, the Human Cloning Prohibition Act, said on the House floor before the vote, "The fact of the matter is, the evidence isn't there"(source at bottom) to support the medical potential of therapeutic cloning.

"Weldon, who was a physician for 15 years and whose opinion on biotechnology is often given a lot of weight on Capitol Hill, insisted there was not a single study -- not even in animals -- indicating the technology could be used to treat disease." (same source at bottom)

Now when REAL scientists were asked about this they said he was plan wrong.

"Weldon's "statement is embarrassing particularly coming from somebody who supposedly has a medical degree," said Dr. Robert Lanza, vice president of medical and scientific development at Advanced Cell Technology of Worcester, Mass., which is developing treatments based on therapeutic cloning." (source at bottom)

Weldon made me mad with his obvious lack of intelligence but decided to lie ot the House on the 27th. These articles that support ESCs can be found at very well known research mags like: genesdev.org - cellpress.com - nature.org - sciencemag.org.

A Nice Sum Up: "You'd be naïve to think there is no medical potential with this technology - You'd have to have your head in the sand." -- Lanza (source at bottom)



Source of quotes:
http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20030303-072941-5844r.htm
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 11 2003, 12:16 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-ESC vs. PRO-ESC=-



Dr. Sally Temple of Albany Medical Center vs. Dr. Virginia Giugliano of Albany IVF

Dr. Temple said, "One has to understand that the cells and the cell lines that we are talking about in no way resemble a baby. It's just a little group of cells that could not live outside of the culture dish." (source at bottom)

"Dr. Temple said the issue should not be controversial. People opposed to embryonic stem cell research make an inconsistent argument because more embryos are created than implanted during the in vitro fertilization process.

"If they would say to those people who want a baby 'How could you do this, how could you generate so many embryos knowing they are not going to be used?', they don't apply the argument in that case," said Dr. Temple." (source at bottom)

"She said, "What happens if the patients have finished their family building and they still have frozen embryos? If she's referring to those embryos, than the couple does have the right to donate those embryos to another couple. So in essence, they could be used for fertility aspects in another patient." (source at bottom)

In a moment I will give you Giugliano's side but since I favor Temple's she gets it first.
Look at the objective view that Temple has: they are cells that can't survive outside the dish, why don't the pro-life people battle with IVF clinics since they will discard some of the embryos. This is a good researcher, we need more with the objective answers.


----------------------------------------------------------

"Dr. Virginia Giugliano of Albany IVF disagrees and has a problem supporting embryonic stem cell research." (source at bottom)

Ok.

"She believes it is impossible to draw a definitive line between what is a life and what is just another group of cells." (source at bottom)

Life and "just another group of cells?" - Something is blatantly wrong here. Cells are alive. Is she talking about establishment of a brain? I don't think she is because then she would come off saying that the brain is the person and violate her religious views. I speculate that she has these.

"Dr. Giugliano said, "There are some people who believe, and there are scientists who believe also that life begins at conception when you've got just the egg and sperm coming together, and just genetic material coming together." (source at bottom)

Ok back up. Now sperm and egg = both haploid. In nature there are plenty of examples of halpontic adults (ie: Spirogyra, Marchantia) So, since "some people and some scientists think" non-life is haploid then all the species which have zygotic life-cycles are now the living dead. Since I doubt she would agree with what she just said I say she is just trying to smear science over a religious issue and making more of an ass of herself. And diploid organisms are nothing without their "dead" gametes.

"She added, "We have stem cells available which are thrown out every day in the umbilical cords of normal deliveries."
Giugliano said this would allow researchers to continue stem cell research without raising ethical questions.
Why not put the dollars into that area of research, as opposed to arguing about something that is very controversial. We are never going to be able to come to a decision where everyone is happy," said Giugliano." (source at bottom)

She is correct, we should take advantage of blood cord due to the understanding of hEukaryotic stem cells. Wait, so just because its controversial of laypeople and may hurt someones religious views means we should loose knowing how ESCs differ out to the multiples of cells? Sorry, just cause you don't think it's "right" doesn't mean the world is going to leave it. And your agruments have no basis so your shooting blanks.

"Giugliano said Temple grossly misrepresents what happens to these embryos. She said most of them are not discarded, but frozen, to potentially be used in the future. Giugliano also said that the majority of reproductive endocrinologists treat all embryos as if they were a potential, viable human being." (source at bottom)

There is an experation date on the viability of the embryos. So most will go to waste.

"Giugliano doesn't believe ethical issues over embryonic stem cell research will ever be solved. She stresses that the medical community should start to focus its attention on umbilical cord research." (source at bottom)

There is over 99% genetic similarity human to human, all research will be usefull to help backtrack cells and further control them.


Source: http://www.capitalnews9.com/content/health_team_9/?ArID=16960&SecID=17
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 11 2003, 06:33 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-

"Until recently, the heart has been seen as an organ that cannot be healed," says Noel Caplice, M.D., the Mayo Clinic cardiologist"

T he researchers studied four female patients with leukemia who had survived 35 to 600 days after receiving bone-marrow transplants from male donors. Heart tissue samples were examined at autopsy using special staining techniques, which showed that a small portion of the heart-muscle cells, or cardiomyocytes, contained male genetic material and had therefore originated from the donor marrow. Of the more than 80,000 cell nuclei examined, about 1 in 425 (.23 percent) contained the y chromosome.

The study is important because it is the first confirmation that progenitor cells from outside the heart are capable of forming new heart muscle cells. "These progenitor cells are produced by the bone marrow and circulate in the blood," explains Dr. Caplice. "They are like stem cells in that they have potential to develop into various kinds of cells. Given the right biological signals, we have now shown they can become heart cells."

Source: http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml;jsessionid=M13LPKM2BGJWBR3FQLMCFEWHUWBNSIV0?sectionId=2&contentType=Articles&action=view&contentItem=101619752&Page=1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 15 2003, 08:51 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Random=-

On March 13th the Law Lords in UK (all 5) voted to drop the last holds on ESC Research. They will still have the strict rules for handling such powerful cells but the point is research can move ahead. Now we have another problem...not enough SC Researchers. That's right folks, the US NIH Stem Cell Taskforce announced that there is a lack in the ability of people to properly culture stem cells. The NIH Taskforce is trying to mend this by sponsoring Stem Cell Training in colleges. Researchers say that it takes hands on experience to culture stem cells.

Also, to bring up something that still is hindering to scientists: Only 9 lines are able to be cultivated and 62 still won't culture. These mainly dysfunctional lines are the "Bush approved stem cells" and lets just say that: ES Cell International in Australia (five lines), University of California SF (one line), BresaGen Inc. Atlanta GA (one line), WiCell Research Inst. Madison Wisc. (two lines) ...makes it a little harder to get things done.


Something that I can't post here due to the tremendous amount of info and copyright will just have to be shortened: Understanding of the Epigenetic (gene memory) factors that play in the "role" of a differentiated cell are coming to light at a great speed. I would say in about 2 years we know exactly how it happens and what proteins (over-generalized) do what.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 19 2003, 05:59 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CONTROLLING STEM CELLS=-

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=103721077&Page=1 [!]

QUOTE
"Scientifically, using a variety of human cells to support the growth of human embryonic stem cells could speed the hunt for the signals that keep the primitive cells from changing. If that happens, we might not need any feeder cells at all."


QUOTE
"When it is time to create new stem cell lines, this issue will be very important," says Cheng. "Our results together with others' show that it should be possible to establish new stem cell lines without using mouse cells or proteins."


Very nice indeed. Finding:
QUOTE
scientists in Singapore reported using human cells -- one set from fetuses, one from the reproductive tract of women -- as feeder cells to grow human ES cells in the lab. But the cells from adult bone marrow have some distinct advantages, says Cheng.
is vague but, still holds promise for researchers being able to understand what growth factors can work best for our needs. Now we just need to get America to lift some of those nasty anti-ESC rules...
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: caliban Mar 23 2003, 08:09 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-

QUOTE
Only 9 lines are able to be cultivated and 62 still won't culture. These mainly dysfunctional lines are the "Bush approved stem cells"


Dear HelixX, could you cite your source for this?

Thanks in advance and also for the excellent information in this thread.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 24 2003, 08:22 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary Response=-

Stem Cell Research News
Volume 5 No. 5
Information is on page 1 and 2.
Title of news article section: Lack of Trained Scientists, Not Stem Cells, Hinders Research, NIH Official Says

Direct quote:

"The NIH stem cell registry currently has nine Bush-approved "distribution quality" embryonic stem cell lines that have the ability to develop into somatic cells in vitro."

If you would like me to post some more direct quotes just ask.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 26 2003, 03:25 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=PRO-STEM CELLS=-

And here we go...

In Albany, NY Christopher Reeve once again has spoken out against banning therapeutic cloning but this time he had some company. Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver stated: "I have serious objections to the total ban on therapeutic cloning and somatic cell nuclear transfer advanced by the Bush administration." The statement was made after the assembly voting 96-46 FOR therapeutic cloning (somatic cell nuclear transfer).

"The federal government has failed in the past and it is likely to fail again," said Reeve. (direct quote)

"White House spokesman Ken Lisaius said President Bush supports efforts in Congress to ban all human cloning, but believes in advancing research through "ethical stem cell research.""(direct quote)

"Silver said he believes biotechnology companies would flock to New York and help boost the economy once it legalizes stem cell research and therapeutic cloning. Gov. George Pataki, who had not yet seen the Assembly proposal, said he supported stem cell research."(direct quote)

"The New York State Catholic Conference opposed the Assembly bill, calling it a "moral outrage."" (direct quote)

Source of information for my sum up and direct quotes: http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/ny-bc-ny--stemcellresearch0319mar19,0,1883541.story?coll=ny-ap-regional-wire%5b/b

The New York State Catholic Conference opposed the Assembly bill, calling it a "moral outrage."

""We sympathize with those who suffer illnesses or disabilities that can potentially be aided by stem cell research. But nothing can justify the creation and killing of human beings for the purpose of possibly curing other human beings," said Executive Director Richard Barnes."

I will respond to this using another source (my sum up and direct quotes): http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/134660390_stemcells240.html

A woman named Dr. Lori Marshall who works at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle has a storage unit of embryos. This Center helps couples figure out what they would like to do with their embryos, the hot new thing to do is give them to research. But due to Bush and this pro-life agenda the storage unit is just sitting there with the embryos...letting the "life" go to waste.

"Marshall is frustrated. As an ethics panelist with the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, she believes embryos deserve special respect as potential human life — they shouldn't be sold, for example."(direct quote)

I agree, increasing information flow of stem cells shouldn't be costly.

A great sum up of two areas!

"The research

Meanwhile, stem-cell research is continuing in many places, though the Bush policy has had a big impact in limiting its scope. Some laboratories have steered away from stem-cell research completely because of the controversy, and U.S. scientists contend they will be at a significant disadvantage to their counterparts in Europe, where there are no restrictions.

Dr. Chuck Murry, an associate professor of pathology at the University of Washington, is attempting to use stem cells to regenerate human heart tissue. He received his first batch in August.

He said researchers are still trying to understand the basics — how the cells change from their primitive state into a specialized cell, or how the body controls their growth so they turn into heart muscle but don't become a tumor.

Much productive work can be done on existing stem cells, Murry said. But as science moves forward in the next two or three years, he said, researchers will begin clamoring for more diverse lines of stem cells, which can come only from new embryos.

The Bush policy does not restrict privately funded research, but so far, the biotech and pharmaceutical industries and their deep-pocketed investors have shown little willingness to pick up where the government is leaving off, because the research is not yet advanced enough to offer big returns on investment.

Private funding for research

In December, Stanford University received a $12 million anonymous donation to establish an institute to use stem cells from embryos in cancer studies. The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation is spending $4 million a year for a variety of stem-cell research, from embryos, adults and animals.

But such funding is minuscule compared with the muscle of the National Institutes of Health, which expects to spend $27.3 billion this year alone on medical research. That's enough money to set up an endowment the size of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation every year.

Marshall said unless the federal government throws its financial might behind more stem-cell research, she can see embryos piling up in freezers or being discarded.

"It's becoming clear that the rest of the world is going to learn things we're not going to learn," she said."(direct quote, source above)
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 27 2003, 07:11 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WHICH ONE IS BETTER?=-

Paper titled: Fetal Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells Can Differentiate Sequentially into Neural Stem Cells and Then Astrocytes In Vitro (you can get it free at www.liebertpub.com/jht)

Hematopoietic stem cells taken from fetal hLiver have been grown in microenviroments with pre-existing astrocytes to develop hNeural stem cells. This isn't set in stone since they don't know if it actually carries out the complete functions of a neuron but it expresses genes (nestin, BMP-2) like a functioning neuron.

Took a while to look into this but I find it quite ponderous. I want to know if they work like regulars and if they do then I was wrong in my thought on regression being "hard to do." Cell memory modules (CMM) do play a major part in this of course, but the ability for other cells to influence this revamp of the placed factors is very interesting. Do the astrocytes detect lack of neurons, thus opening the cellular toolbox for reprograming? Are they freaking out? Where is this ability when neurodegenerative diseases are occurring? What genes are directly influenced to start up the gene locus alterations? This of course opens up some more questions... I welcome it since this could be displaying that all multipotents have a potential to be regressed - a pleasant plasticity if you will. But, we still have to see if they can "act" the part.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 27 2003, 06:57 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Random=-

Arkansa has banned all forms of cloning. North Dakota may follow. (aka: might join shit-list)

http://washingtontimes.com/national/20030325-95699176.htm

"The European Parliament's Committee for the Environment and Public Health has backed calls from fellow MEPs for a comprehensive ban on human cloning and stem cell research."

http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:19975

"The lower house of parliament in Victoria, Australia has passed legislation to allow surplus IVF embryos to be used for stem cell research."

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-03-26-1

[!] ON another note, www.StemCells.com is on free access. Have fun, I know I am!!! [!]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Mar 29 2003, 12:46 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WHICH ONE IS BETTER?=-

In the article: NIH Scientists Say Adult Stem Cells Can Be Reprogrammed it is reported that NIH researchers have shown directly from 5 women who received bone marrow transplants from their brothers that they have Y chrom cheek cells. I guess bone isn't supposed to differ into cheek cells. So this provides strong evidence that adult stem cells can somehow regress back to a primitive state then re-differentiate (aka transdifferentiation). Interesting indeed.

Source: Stem Cell Research News March 28, 2003
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 1 2003, 12:15 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WHICH ONE IS BETTER?=-

Dun Dun DUN!!!

Oregon Health & Science University has found how murine (mouse) adult stem cells repair liver damage, and its not how the ASC advocates would like it to be. Cell fusion, the act in which two (or more) cells can combine and do a sort of polyploidy (not supposed to help animals). Since it only was found to repair the liver through the cellular fusion this is direct evidence that ASCs are not like ESCs. The researchers on this study say: "it is likely that cell fusion is responsible for many of these other cases of stem cell flexibility...However, it's possible that abnormal fused cells would not function in other regions of the body."

To make this focused: There is research showing both ASC are plasticit and not plasticit. Yet it still remains as a fact that both research on ASCs and ESCs yield the same benifit - understanding these regenerative somas.

The researchers of this study are now "investigating whether there is a way to induce cell fusion, or speed up the fusion process, which is naturally quite slow and inefficient."

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml;jsessionid=E40QXNJ0OOUS1R3FQLMCFEWHUWBNSIV0?sectionId=2&contentType=Articles&action=view&contentItem=104958954&Page=1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 1 2003, 05:55 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WHICH ONE IS BETTER?=-

Well to tie the two above posts together I must say this: both research teams who reviewed each others results are interested in what was different. So Simon Tran, who worked with Mezey on the leukaemia study (bone marrow transplant above), now demands that "we should all team up for a multi-centre study." So, if this occurs I bet we will find out that the stem cells were not characterized well enough, again.

http://www.nature.com/nsu/030324/030324-14.html

http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,58278,00.html
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 2 2003, 11:50 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Random=-

QUOTE
Texas House Bill 1175, by Rep. Phil King, R-Weatherford, would ban engaging or attempting to engage in human cloning and would restrict stem cell research.

A human embryo is defined in the bill as a living organism with a full or nearly full human genetic composition in the earliest stages of development, including the one-cell stage.

Violators of the proposed ban would be subject to civil penalties up to
$10 million and felony charges carrying a maximum penalty of life in prison.


Well everyone should be a little aware of this insane bill. This ins't the one that the House of Rep passed, but this person may be able to pass this one if they get enough religous extremeists in there. Check the 2nd page and look for ANTI-STEM CELLS title to find the passed bill.

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/ssistory.mpl/metropolitan/1847935
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE
A British-led team of doctors has taken a revolutionary approach to this delivery problem and, they say, given convincing evidence of GDNF’s promise.
“It turns out that apart from some fiddling with the concentration of the GDNF, the patients tolerated it very well and started to show effects of getting better within two to three months. The improvement came very fast.” After a year, the five recruits showed on average a 39-percent improvement in motor skills, and a 61-percent improvement in their quality of life. Scans showed that the targeted cells had a 28 percent increase in dopamine storage. In addition, jerky movements caused as a side-effect of taking L-dopa fell massively, by nearly two thirds.


Direct injection of growth factors...mmm...I think we have something here. Dump the stem cells in and pump on the GFs. Sounds like it could work.

http://www.vanguardngr.com/articles/2002/world/w201042003.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE
“I am not saying it is wrong to have these religious views that object, but I think these people should be listening to patients who have got these disorders,” Dr Dexter said.


http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-626734,00.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE
Russia's first stem cell bank has opened, offering parents the opportunity to preserve their children's genetic material for possible future use in fighting diseases,said the bank's chief executive .
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=1508&ncid=751&e=9&u=/afp/20030331/hl_afp/health_russia_stemcell
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QUOTE
Roger Williams Medical Center has opened a treatment and research center that doctors hope will bring the curative power of stem cells to more patients. People with wounds that fail to heal properly will be the first beneficiaries. Doctors hope to begin treatment of people with muscular dystrophy within a year and of people with lung disorders within two years. Stem-cell repair of diseased hearts, brains and other organs is also on the horizon.


http://boston.com/dailynews/088/region/Stem_cell_treatment_center_ope:.shtml
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 11 2003, 11:37 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=REFRESHER ON STEM CELLS=-
I was hesitant at first for posting this a couple days ago but now that I have time to look it over I have found this to be a good outline of what stem cells can be all about.

So, in using this outline I will provide a good idea of - Whats so good about stem cells?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Promise:::
Stem cell research is one of the promising areas of biotechnology, which offers the prospect of developing new methods to repair or replace tissues or cells damaged by injuries or diseases. Stem cell research is expected to be equally important for basic science to understand cell differentiation and growth.

Problem:::
One of the possible sources for stem cells is human pre-implantation embryos. However, when this research involves the use of human embryos it raises the question of ethical values at stake and of the limits and conditions for such research.

What will occur due to this paper:::
Taking into account the seminar's outcome, the Commission will submit a proposal establishing further guidelines on principles for deciding on the Community funding of research projects involving the use of human embryos and human embryonic stem cells. I do think they are going to make this decision on the 24th of April.

Characteristics of human stem cells:::
Stem cells have three characteristics that distinguish them from other types of cells:

*they are non-differentiated (unspecialized) cells,

*they can divide and multiply in their undifferentiated state for a long period.

*under certain physiological or experimental conditions, they can also give rise to more specialized differentiated cells such as nerve cells, muscle cells or insulin producing cells etc.

Good Definitions -
Human embryonic stem cells, which can be derived from a preimplantation embryo at the blastocyst stage.

Human embryonic germ cells,which can be isolated from the primordial germ cells of the fetus.

Human somatic stem cells, which can be isolated from adult or fetal tissues or organs or from umbilical cord blood.

For the development of novel stem cell based therapies. Three therapeutic concepts are currently being envisaged:::
Transplantation of differentiated cells derived from stem cells: Stem cells may be grown and directed to differentiate into specific cell types in the laboratory and then be transplanted (e.g. insulin producing cells to treat diabetes, heart muscle cells to treat heart failure or dopamine producing neurones to treat Parkinson's disease etc...) The source for the specific differentiated cell types could be embryonic or somatic stem cells, including the patient's own stem cells.

Direct administration of stem cells: In some cases it may be possible and/or necessary to administer stem cells directly to the patient in such a way that they would colonize the correct site of the body and continuously differentiate into the desired cell type (e.g. systemic "Homing").

Stimulation of endogenous stem cells: The possibility that self-repair could be induced or augmented by stimulating an individual's own population of stem cells for example by administrating growth factors is also being explored.

Here are some more, not really the mainstream but equally as important:::
Gene Regulation: Understanding of the mechanisms regulating stem cell growth, fate, differentiation and dedifferentiation.

Quallity Control: Eliminating the risk of development of inappropriate differentiated cells and cancerous cells. The risk of tumorigenicity has in particular been highlighted concerning the use of human ES cells as these stem cells develop teratomas.

Quallity Control: Ensuring the function and viability of the stem cells or their derivatives during the recipient's life.

Overcoming the problem of immune rejection (which does not arise in the case where the patient's own stem cells can be used).

Several arguments have been put forward regarding the needs for derivation of new human embryonic stem cell lines.

To Trash or To Improve, that is the Question

http://europa.eu.int/rapid/start/cgi/guesten.ksh?p_action.gettxt=gt&doc=MEMO/03/81|0|RAPID&lg=EN
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 12 2003, 09:25 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE BRAIN=-
And to continue...

Stem Cell Research News reports that Saint Louis University has been further strengthening the possilibilities of utilizing stem cells as regenerative medicine. They took human blood cord stem cells and injected them into rats right after they had a stroke. "This treatment improved sensorimotor function." Dr. Yi Pan, M.D. Alma Bicknese and PhD Michael Panneton were involved in this study.


Also SCRN reported another research study on neuronal restoration with lysosomal storage diseases (ouch!) such as: Tay-Sachs, Hunter, Krabbe etc etc.

This is a good test model to study since it represents quick aging due to the toxic enzymes degrading eyes, brain etc. Much can be learned about how stem cells can aid in this "clean up" of degraded systems.

The mice model was Batten disease. "Batten disease refers to several closely related genetic disorders caused by deficiency of an enzyme required for normal metabolism," said Dr. Stan Tamaki. When the mice were injected with human Central Nervous System Stem Cells they did recover the enzyme that helps maintain the order.

Stem Cells Research News.
Volume 5.
No. 7.
Pages 1,2,3.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 15 2003, 04:57 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS=-



http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,934363,00.html

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/2932421.stm

But, away from a potential let down (by ~60 votes for the "religious right") lets talk about...
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE EYES=-

Normally I wounldn't post this much of the article but you have to "register" to see it and that just stunk.

"A little-known operation restores hope for people who lose sight from chemical or heat burns of the eye or certain rare diseases. The procedure, 50 to 100 percent effective in healing corneal damage, is used worldwide, including Iran, where it helps restore sight for victims of Iraqi mustard gas attacks.

A variation on corneal transplants, the surgery grafts stem cells from a donor or a patient's good eye to the injured eye. The cells are from the limbus, a rim around the cornea. The cells resheath the cornea's surface, the 50-micron-thick epithelium, to maintain it as a transparent window. When burns or disease wipe out the limbal stem cells, the epithelium clouds over with scar tissue, causing blindness.

Grafting even a small piece of limbus can lead the stem cells to regrow clear epithelium — and keep it clear — thus restoring sight. The cells even recover transplanted corneas. Stem cell transplants and corneal transplants are frequently performed one after the other if corneal damage extends below the epithelium.

The discovery of the cells 17 years ago and clinical proof that they keep working in any eye with an intact tear system has opened a new era in eye surgery.

It's an outstanding breakthrough and has, at least in the short run, cured a number of patients," said Dr. Richard S. Fisher, director of the corneal disease program at the National Eye Institute in Bethesda, Md."

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 16 2003, 11:47 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS=-

http://www.sltrib.com/2003/Apr/04112003/nation_w/47029.asp
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Random=-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&cid=571&ncid=751&e=4&u=/nm/20030411/hl_nm/cloning_ethics_dc
Eric Cohen, resident scholar at the Washington DC-based Ethics and Public Policy Institute AND a consultant on the President's Council on Bioethics.

Can we say "I know what slanted language and contortion is going to sprout from this mouth."

Its not as bad an article as I thought. But I do think this smells of some plan...or maybe he is a consultant due to not being a religious zelot like the Bush backers. *shrug*
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 18 2003, 03:33 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE BRAIN=-
In Science Now on April 16 2003 it was reported that adult stem cells, once injected into the bloodsteam, would help to recover the Multiple Sclerosis mouse models. The adult stem cells specialized into oligodendrocytes and 45 days after the injection the mice could walk again. The oligodendrocytes repair myelin sheaths (whats degraded in MS).
"The notion that you can target not just focal lesions but disseminated lesions using this type of delivery system is very powerful. That's what I think the real take-home message would be." --Ian Duncan, neuroscientist at the University of Wisconsin.

The actual paper is in the April 17 issue of Nature.

Here are some free articles: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030416/ap_on_he_me/ms_stem_cells_2
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20030416/sc_nm/science_ms_dc_1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-
Stimulating the stem cells in the heart
"Working with an animal model, Nadal-Ginard and his team successfully repaired hearts damaged by heart attacks. They did so by stimulating the stem cells - the body's "master" cells that can turn into specialized cells - to multiply and differentiate to repair the damaged heart muscle.

The team has accomplished the repair without removing the stem cells, stimulating them in place by injecting a protein that helps communication between cells.

"We believe this might work in humans," Nadal-Ginard says. "But we must study it more in animals to see if there are any long-term [adverse] effects."
Article: http://www.health24.co.za/news.asp?action=art&SubContentTypeId=35&ContentID=21817
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 23 2003, 04:31 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMPATABILITY ISSUE=-
In some cases of stem cell transplants from female donors to male recipients the transplanted cells from the females stem cells will actually start attacking the males body. Why? Seems to be due to one gene.

Emmanuel Zorn, PhD, says it is the first time that the gene, located on the Y chromosome and known as DBY, has been identified following a female-to-male stem cell transplant for leukemia.

http://www.dfci.harvard.edu/abo/news/press/040903.asp
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Florida will Join the Research Effort=-

"The Senate unanimously approved creation of a biomedical research institute Wednesday, hoping to make Florida a key player in the search for cures for Alzheimer's disease, cancer and other illnesses."

"The center's medical activities will include stem-cell research, using cells from bone marrow, placental tissue and umbilical cord blood."

http://www.tallahassee.com/mld/democrat/news/local/5650600.htm
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 23 2003, 11:23 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=NEW SOURCE FOR STEM CELLS=-

Yea, this came out a day ago but I was ill then so bla.

Here is the main points extracted from original article...
Scientists report for the first time that "baby" teeth, the temporary teeth that children begin losing around their sixth birthday, contain a rich supply of stem cells in their dental pulp.
They are long lived, grow rapidly in culture, and, with careful prompting in the laboratory, have the potential to induce the formation of specialized dentin, bone, and neuronal cells.
The group launched an initial round of studies to determine whether the cells would grow well in culture. Using dental pulp extracted from the children's exfoliated incisors, they discovered that about 12 to 20 stem cells from each tooth reproducibly had the ability to colonize and grow in culture.
"These data are just the start," said Shi. "We're trying to characterize more fully which cell types can be generated from these stem cells. Can they be switched into nerve cells only? We need to find this out. We're also interested in determining the difference between adult dental pulp stem cells and those in deciduous teeth."


http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=108841360&Page=1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 28 2003, 12:09 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS: NER UPREGULATION=-
My first sign of upregulation being done experimentally for the purpose of increasing life showed up in SAGE KE's "Is DNA Cut Out for a Long Life?"

To test the DNA damage hypothesis David Sinclair et al upregulated the APN1 Gene in Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). The AP family consists of endonucleases, which lyse out DNA bases.segments for Nucleotide Excision Repair. When the results were reviewed it was found that upregulating the APN1 gene didn't increase life-span.

There are some explanations to be presented. First, I bet we need to find a key part of the GG-NER/TC-NER system to upregulate and that will increase the sensitivity - this can be done in a reasonable time (couple of years). Second, Yeast do differ from Human models...yea duh. So we may need to investigate primate cell cultures.

Overall it will be valuable to Stem Cells when we can increase repair and - How far may we be able to go with it?
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 28 2003, 04:20 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=PRO-STEM CELLS (Political Backlash for Bush)=-
A leading Republican senator has asked the White House to allow more human stem cell lines to be generated, reopening an issue that President Bush seemed to have settled in 2001.

Citing potentially safer cell supplies, the senator, Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, asked Mr. Bush in a letter sent Monday to "expand" his decision of Aug. 9, 2001, which allowed federally supported researchers to work on human embryonic stem cells created before that date.

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/04/23/national/23CELL.html

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=PRO-STEM CELLS (Political Backlash for Bush)=-
A series of important advances have boosted the potential of human embryonic stem cells to treat heart disease, spinal cord injuries and other ailments, but researchers say they are unable to take advantage of the new techniques under a two-year-old administration policy that requires federally supported scientists to use older colonies of stem cells.

Now pressure is building from scientists, patient advocates and members of Congress to loosen the embryo-protecting restrictions imposed by President Bush, with some on Capitol Hill saying they want to take up the issue next month.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7107-2003Apr21.html

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS: BLOOD=-
Scientists have identified a gene that plays a key role in the growth of stem cells that form all the cells of the blood and immune system, and it could have implications for certain cancers, such as leukemia.

The gene, dubbed Bmi-1, is needed for blood stem cells -- both cancerous and normal ones -- to regenerate, according to two studies published in the advance online edition of the journal Nature.

The finding could offer insight into ways to shut down cancers of the immune system, such as leukemia, an expert said.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=571&ncid=571&e=15&u=/nm/20030425/hl_nm/gene_blood_dc_1
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Apr 28 2003, 06:00 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS: BONE TO LEUKOCYTES=-
An exciting discovery has been found by Howard Hughes Medical Institute. A protein has been isolated which triggers hematopoetic stem cell proliferation. Using it to encourage bone marrow stem cells to proliferate will greatly enhance immune system reconstruction after irradiation. It is also likely that the similar mechanisms exist in other stem cells that would encourage them to proliferate thus increasing dramatically the possibility of tissue regeneration.

Link to Press Release

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-04/hhmi-pos042803.php
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 29 2003, 05:26 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=AGGRESSIVE QUALITY CONTROL FOR STEM CELLS=-
News from Geron, remember them?

They cultured 3 feeder-free hESC lines for over a year (more then 70 culturings). Also having them express 8 cell surface markers for the whole time helped keep track of abnormalities. When Microarrays were done: 23 of 2,798 tested genes had upregulated more then 3-fold in expression after being cultured 12-27 weeks. Any with odd karyotypes could easily be identified, discarded and replenished from frozen hESC banks. Overall the great thing on top of the quallity control - the hESCs maintained pluripotency 1 1/2 years into continuous culture.

Geron also is taking quality control to the hight of human quallity. Four lines of hESCs, from University of Wisconsin-Madison, were tested for:
sterility
HIV 1 & 2
human T cell leukemia viruses 1 & 2
human cytomegalovirus
hepatitis B & C

The H1 line was tested even more to make sure there was no viruses of:
human
porcine
murine
bovine

They all checked out clear.

Source: Stem Cell Research News Vol. 5 No. 8
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTORS FOR MANUFACTURING=-
For some more great news: Geron displayed that using defined and highly purified reagents can be used to culture hESCs - which enables manufacturing specifications for hESC based products.

Source: Stem Cell Research News Vol. 5 No. 8
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Apr 30 2003, 10:36 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTOR: INHIBITING NEURON GROWTH=-
Adults loose the ability to quickly, if at all, grow new neural connections - and this may be why. There are 3 types of neural growth inhibitors called nogo-a. nogo-b and nogo-c (fleeting moment of name skill). If one is taken out then the other two will increase production. So, a question is if we take out this ability to grow will it increase the chance of cancer? Even better, what if we try nulling all 3 nogo's in the cancer resistant mice? (See cancer thread) http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=39&t=368&st=48&#entry9341

There is a lot of work to be done making human issue stem cells even better, but it will be worth it.

Source: SAGE KE - Go or No-Go? Mixed results complicate hopes for nerve regeneration April 30th
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto May 2 2003, 04:50 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=NEW METHOD FOR GROWING STEM CELLS?=-
Parthenogenesis for Stem Cells
A team led by fertility specialist David Wininger at biotech firm Stemron of Maryland has grown parthenogenetic human embryos to the blastocyst stage, at which stem cells can be obtained. Cells taken from one of the embryos survived for a few days (Stem Cells, vol 21, p 152).

The next step is to get the cells to grow in culture indefinitely: that is, to obtain a stem cell line. In monkeys, such a cell line has been growing for over two years, and it makes the human experiments all the more relevant.

According to Vrana, extensive analysis of the monkey cells suggests that they are indistinguishable from normal embryonic stem cells. "They are identical to ESCs by every known criterion we have tested," he says, adding that details will soon be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

A lot of work still has to be done to ensure any tissues made from parthenogenetic stem cells are absolutely normal, says Jerry Hall of the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics in Los Angeles.

Do I think this is going to take over the persuit of utilizing a "two-gamete-made" blastocyst, no.

http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/cloning/cloning.jsp?id=ns99993654

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
Wnt works it's way into the Spotlight

Reporting in the April 27, 2003 online issue of the journal Nature, Reya has shown that the Wnt pathway is necessary for normal stem cell survival and proliferation and that activating the Wnt pathway causes hematopoietic stem cells to regenerate in their immature state instead of as differentiated, mature cells.

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-04-30-3

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE SPINE=-
To-Be-Presented Results on hCNS Repair

Dr. Aileen J. Anderson and Dr. Brian J. Cummings, of the Reeve-Irvine Center at the University of California are the key players in this research.
Injured mice transplanted with hCNS-SC showed improved motor function in quantitative tests designed to measure functional recovery from complete hind limb paralysis to normal walking, in comparison with controls. A direct link has also been made between the amount of functional recovery and the level of human cell engraftment. Additionally, the hCNS-SC does not contribute to scarring due to glial cell proliferation, which normally inhibits neuronal cell growth and recovery.

http://cbs.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/newsarticle.asp?g=5F724F4D5AA448E7BC11E38641C81A24&siteid=mktw&dist=nbk

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=QUALITY CONTROL OF STEM CELLS=-
Stem Cells get a proposed Scale

Minoru Ko of the National Institutes of Health in Bethesda, Maryland et al presented a scale for stem cells based on 88 genes which are subset to the 3000 normaly going on. How active these 88 genes are can give SC catagorists a checklist to make sure that what they have does what it should.

http://www.nature.com/nsu/030428/030428-15.html

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

As for industry and religion its as usual, a little leadway here and a little piss and vinegar there.

Posted by: Cyto May 7 2003, 11:15 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
A gene in yeast has been directly found to impact life extension while under the CR diet. "A yeast strain with five copies of PNC1 lives 70 percent longer than the wild type strain, the longest lifespan extension yet reported in that organism."

This helps reinforce that more production can further lifespan which also coincides with upregulation of genes. So if we are to increase gene numbers for NER proteins wouldn't that be "killing two birds with one stone?" Being that if you increase the production of the repair mechanisms then you protect the repair genes along with the rest of the genome. Quite nice, very nice.

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml;jsessionid=FIC2XOQYPZ3NZR3FQLMCFEWHUWBNSIV0?sectionId=2&contentType=Articles&action=view&contentItem=109520481&Page=1

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Another Company Moves to Sing=-
Israeli's ES Cell International moves to Singapore

http://www.globes.co.il/serveen/globes/docview.asp?did=685850&fid=942
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long May 8 2003, 12:03 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-

QUOTE
Israeli's ES Cell International moves to Singapore


As ours and many larger developed nations become more repressive in order to pander to the more reactionary members of their voting public, the need for more and more operations to move offshore will become paramount and we will notice it when we start seenig a real drop off in funding sources domestically. They can fund all the fruitless studies they want but if the real research is offshore then that is where all the major medtech operations will have to develop a presence.

This parallels what happened in the 70's when auto manufacturers tried to pretend they could dictate to the consumer what kind of car they should have even though the consumer was telling them they wanted the competitor's model. Well this will come down to who's buying in the end. If the consumer wants the results of advanced tech and then they make it illegal anyway then just like contraband drugs, all that will do is drive up the costs and send production off shore, but it will mean fantastic profits to the dealers in this comodity.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long May 9 2003, 01:25 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=A CALL FOR MORE CELLS=-
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20030508/ap_on_sc/stem_cells&e=1

Fewer Stem Cells Available for Research
Thu May 8, 2:47 PM ET Science - AP

By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Only 11 human stem cell lines are available for research, far fewer than originally estimated, the director of the National Institutes of Health reports.

The finding led to a call for lifting the restriction that President Bush placed on stem cell research.

NIH Director Elias Zerhouni, writing in Friday's edition of the journal Science, says his agency is giving a high priority to research using stem cells because of the potential for treatment of diseases such as diabetes and Parkinson's.

But Zerhouni's review of the status of work supported by the NIH also shows that initial reports of more than 70 stem cell lines eligible for research were optimistic.

Donald Kennedy, editor in chief of the journal, contends in an accompanying editorial that development of new cell lines for research is necessary. "It is plainly not sound policy to retain the current restrictions on work" with human embryonic stem cells, he said.

Stem cells form very early in an embryo's development. They can develop into numerous types of cells to form organs and other parts of the body. Researchers hope to use these cells to repair damaged organs and cure diseases.

But the work is controversial because the cells are taken from days-old embryos, which then die. Opponents say this is unethical.

Sources of cells are excess embryos from fertility clinics. The American Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported Thursday that there are 396,526 frozen embryos in storage in the United States and that 88 percent are planned for use in helping families have children in the future.

Obtaining stem cells for research has led to studies into the potential of cloning embryos, a process also criticized by opponents.

The president has ordered that that stem cell research can continue but scientists receiving federal funds can use only cell lines that were available on Aug. 9, 2001. The Health and Human Services (news - web sites) Department reported at the time that more than 70 cell lines — continuously propagating cell colonies — were available.

But Zerhouni says in his paper that many of those cell lines were in the early stages of development and were not to the point where they could be distributed for use. To overcome this, he reports, the NIH provided grants to bring the cell lines to the point where they can be used.

"As a consequence of this support, the number of cell lines available for widespread distribution has grown from a single cell line in the spring of 2002 to 11 cell lines at present," Zerhouni wrote.

Kennedy contends that new lines are needed for research because all current ones were developed in the presence of mouse cells that provided needed growth factors, and thus may be contaminated with viruses or proteins from those cells.

Human embryonic stem cells can now be grown without the mouse cells, Kennedy says, thanks to new methods developed using private funds or in other countries not subject to the U.S. restrictions.

The low number of cell lines currently available has drawn complaints from scientists that the shortage was hampering research.

"The existing restrictions are keeping advances from being realized," Dr. George Daley of the Whitehead Institute at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology told a Senate Appropriations subcommittee last fall.

Gaining access to those limited cell lines has been difficult, several researchers said. They cited costs, problems negotiating agreements with the cells' owners and restrictions imposed by governments of foreign countries, where many of the cells are located.

Zerhouni reports in his paper that the NIH has negotiated agreements with several sources of stem cells for their use in NIH programs. The deals specify that the cells be made available to other researchers under terms no more stringent that those the agency agreed to.
___

On the Net:

Science: http://www.sciencemag.org
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto May 12 2003, 10:08 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-


QUOTE
Sources of cells are excess embryos from fertility clinics. The American Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported Thursday that there are 396,526 frozen embryos in storage in the United States and that 88 percent are planned for use in helping families have children in the future.


QUOTE
The finding that only 11 cell lines are currently available instead of more than 70 led to a call for lifting the restrictions and development of new cell lines.


First quote from the article supplied by Laz is very interesting. This should make the process of carving out Bush's Anti-Stem Cell agenda a lot harder for pro-lifers to hold up. I mean: a lot of those face the trash can!

The second quote give 11 cell lines when Stem Cell Research News posted that there was 9 available, don't view this as conflicting - 9,10 or 11 is still very few from the original lines we were supposed to have.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

[!] Today StemCells.com has a new issue out and the free access is still live - Check it out! [!
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________]

Posted by: Cyto May 22 2003, 07:19 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Adult Stem Cells: Do we have a winner?=-

So an experiment published by Tissue Engineering in 2002 had little notice...until now.

QUOTE
That changed in 2002, when New Scientist revealed that Catherine Verfaillie of the University of Minnesota had discovered "multipotent adult progenitor cells", or MAPCs, apparently capable of giving rise to all tissues in the body, just like embryonic stem cells (26 January 2002, p 4). The work was later published in Nature.


So we can have something that may rival hESC and we can get it from ourselves a lot easier then having to deal with politics of hESCs. Course this does have problems...

QUOTE
The legal repercussions of Genzyme's claims could also be profound. Osiris already has several patents on MSCs and some of their medical applications, while Verfaillie has a pending patent application on MAPCs. What if they are the same cell?  "Only one [group] can get a valid patent to the thing itself," says British patent attorney Andrew Sheard. "If it really is the same thing it doesn't sound hopeful for the second group."


But hey, it's not as bad as the ESC problem. Now for:

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=QUALITY CONTROL FOR STEM CELLS=-

QUOTE
Genzyme started looking at the potential of stem cells from different labs. 
"People weren't using the same set of tools to evaluate their cells," says Tubo.
His team therefore set out to devise a systematic way of comparing different types of adult stem cells.


http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/cloning/cloning.jsp?id=ns99993723

Conclusion: Patents are stupid.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long May 22 2003, 01:05 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-

My apologies upfront Helix for stretching the limits of CIRA but this is why I feel there exists a logic to linking stem cell harvesting with cosmetic surgery and cryogenic storage. By harvesting tissue, extracting and cultivating stem cells from elective procedures that are for other purposes while the patient is still healthy we increase the viability of the product and develop a means of storing the product at peak levels of quantity & utility.

This requires an across the board review and revamping of the Health Insurance and HMO concepts but it is workable. No one is currently in this market in this manner. Would you contribute a small amount extra to create a REAL health insurance system that provides proactive elective procedures and the benefits of personalized DNA matched stem cells as a hedge against degenerative cancers at a later date?

Nothing I am suggesting requires additional scientific breakthroughs right now, only refinements of what we already know how to do and the reorganization of a bureaucratic and economic dinosaur. But storing our own tissues does create the possibility that future medtech advances (such as growing organs and repairing nerve tissue) can be applied that much quicker to ourselves as needed. We would be banking (for both security and cumulative interest) our Stem Cells for the future while undergoing elective procedures that are made to reduce risk today and improve self image.

The reduction in risk for example, is from the removal of excess total body fat content and doing more routine full medical exams as a standard of preventive care as well as creating a system of biometric feedback for the patient with regard to lifestyle choices that reflect a comprehensive review from the level of genetic risk screening to a personalized diet Do it right and we can link Bali Fitness into an HMO (joke).

There are a variety of tissues that are involved, and ALL should be examined for their potential. I have suggested this before as another way to legitimize the Cryogenic meme and produce self supporting revenue for those facilities to function in an ongoing manner. Cryo storage of StemCell tissues is vastly less expensive than bodies, or even just heads.

Consider this one a "no brainer" wink.gif)

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto May 27 2003, 10:32 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS CORRECTED=-

This is Laz's post.

I decided to create this here along side the science of Stem Cells as a close aside. I think it is a valid study in modern memetics and also shouldn't be tucked away in the general discussion and allowed to flounder in disregard for its inherent absurdity.

In that light let me begin with an ironic image.

Imagine an actor that could sleep with Jane Fonda still and never forget it though paralyzed and another president who could have slept with Marylin Monroe and have already forgotten it sleeping together in the same hospital room awaitng treatment. Ahh politics doth make strange bedfellows of us all.

Here is another in the strange antiheroes lining up for battle as the sides form.

Monday, 30 September, 2002, 13:39 GMT 14:39 UK
Reagan lobbies for stem cell research


Mrs Reagan says research could help cure Alzheimer's

Former First Lady Nancy Reagan has been privately lobbying in favour of federal financing for embryonic stem cell research, according to US news reports.
Mrs Reagan is said to believe that the research could lead to a cure for Alzheimer's disease, which has afflicted her husband, former US President Ronald Reagan.

But the New York Times newspaper quoted a friend of Mrs Reagan as saying that she felt President George W Bush's controversial decision to restrict funding for the research was hampering efforts to cure Alzheimer's and other conditions.

The paper said she had been privately discussing the issue with members of the US Congress.

It said she had also written to the president and met several prominent members of the White House, including Chief of Staff Andrew Card.

She has also raised the issue across party lines, speaking with prominent Democrat supporters such as actor Warren Beatty.

"A lot of time is being wasted," she told a friend, whom she permitted to pass her words on to the newspaper.

"A lot of people who could be helped are not being helped."

'Triple threat'

Mrs Reagan's comments could prove an embarrassment to the Bush administration, given the prominent position and popularity she enjoys in Republican circles.

She said recently in a US television interview that her husband's health and memory had deteriorated to the extent that he no longer recognises her.

"It's lonely, because... there's nothing that anybody can do for you," she told the CBS channel.

Republican Senator Arlen Specter told the paper that Mrs Reagan had been "very helpful" in raising awareness of the issue of stem cell research.

"She's a former first lady, she holds a special position because of her own persuasive personality, and her husband, President Reagan, has Alzheimer's... she's a triple threat."

White House spokesman Adam Levine told the newspaper that while they respected Mrs Reagan's views "the president is confident that the decision he made last year strikes the right balance between moral and ethical responsibility and furthering scientific research."

Political debate

Mrs Reagan is the latest high-profile figure to criticise the Bush administration for its decision to limit funding for stem cell research.

The decision was due in part to pressure from conservative and religious groups which hold considerable sway within the Republican party.

Former Superman actor Christopher Reeve, left severely disabled following a riding accident, last month explicitly blamed the Bush administration for blocking research which he believes could cure his condition.

Supporters believe the research could be valuable in curing or alleviating chronic and degenerative conditions such as diabetes, Parkinson's disease and spinal cord injuries.

But opponents argue that the procedures involved constitute murder and believe that work with adult stem cells, from bone marrow or other tissues, may be equally promising.

The Senate is still considering legislation which could ban such research completely.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto May 27 2003, 10:33 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Commentary=-
This is Laz's post.

All I can personally add to the reading of this article is that Christopher Reeves is now a true Superman in my mind as Hollywood never could have created and Reagan's greatest Swan's Song as a Politico Actor (his never justly earned Oscar having been for his Presidency) are being played out before our eyes on the world's stage.

You know it is a remarkable feat and a truly Shakesperian Epic to behold if for little else than its humanity.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 5 2003, 08:28 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTOR IN PROGRESS/GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
What makes this different from anyother Growth Factor promise? The fact that this forces ESCs to become neurons. They don't know all about it but lets look over how it acts...

QUOTE
Out of many molecules that induced neuronal differentiation, the researchers focused on TWS119, which has the ability to bind a cellular kinase enzyme called glycogen synthase kinase-3beta, a multifunctioning "signaling" enzyme that modulates other enzymes by attaching a phosphate group to them.


TWS119 acts as a heterodimer that binds to this protein kinase thus forming a functional dimer for this process. I can't state that I know which one may have a DNA sequence-specific binding domain but I would put some money on the TWS119 since it seems to be the carrier. Now the GSK-3beta (glycogen synthase kinase-3beta) has the ability to phosphorylate something...could it be the CTD of the RNAP II, or maybe a lysine mod? We do know that this heterdimer does have the ability to do so. It will be interesting seeing what task it performs.

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-06-03-2
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
QUOTE
Gene Found for Embryonic Stem Cell Potency::: Two research teams, one led by Austin Smith from the University of Edinburgh and the other led by Shinya Yamanaka of Japan's Nara Institute of Science and Technology, discovered the gene last year and have collaborated since.


QUOTE
In one experiment, for example, Smith's team inserted the human nanog gene into mouse embryonic stem cells and found that it prevented the cells from differentiating into specific types of tissue.

Researchers still have to determine, however, what signal turns nanog on, after which they may be able to develop drugs that activate the gene.

This will require more research on human embryos, which means that the controversy over their use won't go away soon.


http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-05-30-3
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
Leading researchers and representatives of major funding organizations from about 12 different countries gathered in London on Friday, May 30 for a meeting convened by the UK's Medical Research Council. Scientists from countries at the forefront of stem cell research have been discussing ways to pool resources and share information in a bid to speed up the development of new medical applications.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030602/02/
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
Well, as it seems, the key transcription factors are being found and there is still enough time to sit down and talk about it. Life is good.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 8 2003, 08:56 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=To Improve the: GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
Durable Dwarves: Stress-resistant cells come in small packages
From SAGE KE:::http://sageke.sciencemag.org/

The mellow surf bum might outlast the type A executive because she lets stress bounce off her. Similarly, long-lived dwarf mice might endure because their cells resist numerous affronts, according to new work. The results provide a possible explanation for why the petite animals persist and also bolster the suspected connection between longevity and stress resistance.

Several pint-sized mouse strains live unusually long. For instance, Snell dwarves meet their cheesemaker 50% later than do normal mice. The animals harbor a mutation that blocks pituitary maturation and, as a consequence, hinders the production of several hormones that are crucial for growth. For example, amounts of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) are tiny. Crippling an IGF-1-like pathway in worms and flies extends life span. Together, the observations suggest that different organisms share hormonal circuits that govern longevity (see "Growing Old Together"). The long-lived flies and worms with glitches in the IGF-1-like pathway shrug off stress and pump out excess repair proteins (see Johnson Review). Some data hint that persistent rodents resist adversity (see "One for All"), but researchers haven't sealed the connection in the furry beasts. Murakami and colleagues wondered whether Snell dwarf mice boast a particularly strong stress response.

To address that question, the researchers grew skin cells from the animals in culture. Then they bombarded the cells with a variety of noxious treatments: heat, ultraviolet radiation, the herbicide paraquat, hydrogen peroxide, and the poisonous metal cadmium. Fifty percent more dwarf than normal cells survived paraquat or UV treatment; more than twice as many survived heat, peroxide, or cadmium treatment. Cells from two lines of mice--each carrying the Snell mutation--showed heightened fortitude, implying that the Snell mutation itself is responsible. The authors plan to hunt for genes with altered activity in the dwarves; those genes could lead them to the biochemical pathways by which these mice fight off life's assaults...
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=To Improve the: GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
Lost Without a LIM: Protein drives cells to wounds
From SAGE KE:::http://sageke.sciencemag.org/

BARGA, ITALY--Like the battery in an ambulance, a protein called Ajuba sparks events that propel cells to the scene of an accident, according to new work. The results illuminate the molecular details of cell movement during wound healing, a process that malfunctions in the elderly. Extending the findings might suggest strategies for improving healing.

As people age, their ability to mend breaches in skin or other tissues diminishes, although the cause is unclear. Normally, repair cells migrate to the wound site to seal the sore and establish new, healthy tissue. The cells must clamber over other cells and wind through the tissue's protein matrix to get there; contact with the matrix gives cells the traction they need to move. Gregory Longmore, a cell biologist at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, and colleagues previously discovered that two members of the LIM protein family connect receptors in a cell's membrane to its cytoskeleton, the protein network that gives cells their shape and enables them to move.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
All I can say is that things seem to be working in the favor of having an already existing "to fix" list for future designer stem cells.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 11 2003, 12:10 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=NEW CLASS OF STEM CELLS?=-
Immunodeficient mice were injected with these hStem Cells that deal with erythrocyte (red blood cell) production. They don't say what exactly the cell is but the results were very nice (erythroblasts? mylotic?). So the mice injected gained high levels of RBCs within the first one-two weeks, which is one-two weeks faster then with normally used hema stem cells. No cancer subjects occurred. The thing that is valuable to us? Forming a classical model to create faster response stem cells.
Source is Stem Cell Research News:Vol. 5 No. 11
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=FIRST CARDIAC STEM CELL TRANSPLANT - WILL IT WORK?=-
Heart failure strikes 400,000-700,000 (American) people a year, wouldn't it be nice to do something about it?
About a month ago the subject had thigh muscle biopsy then the biopsy was sent to Diacrin, which develops cell therapies. Now they cultured the stem cells extracted to make 300 million. The subject underwent 32 injections in the heart from his own stem cells. They are monitoring the progress but it may take 12 weeks to see the results.
Source is Stem Cell Research News:Vol. 5 No. 11
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=UNDERSTANDING HOW NEURONAL STEM CELLS DIFFERENTIATE=-
2 genes - 2 protein pathways. One is a basic Helix-loop-Helix pathway which generates a wide range of nstem cells and the LIM Homeodomain determines what nstem cells are produced.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 19 2003, 01:41 AM



The meeting attracted more than 700 people, included scientific sessions by dozens of the world’s top stem cell researchers. The meeting also featured an ethics roundtable discussion and a town hall meeting to identify issues the society should address.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GROWTH FACTORS/GENETICS=-
Muahh!!! From BetterHumans.com...

Neural fetal stem cells can be coaxed into neurospheres that can migrate to different parts of the brain and develop into the specialized cells that it comprises.

These cells tend to stop dividing in culture, but Wright and colleagues found that they could extend their shelf life by adding a signaling chemical known as leukemia inhibitory factor.

The research team also used gene chip analysis to determine which genes were active in the neurospheres.

Understanding this could lead to genetic modifications for improving the use of neurospheres.

Through genetic manipulation, for example, it may be possible to create neurospheres that fool the immune system so that it doesn't reject them as foreign, eliminating the need for drugs that suppress immunity.

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-06-11-4
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 20 2003, 09:04 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=RNAi PRODUCES HIV RESISTANT IMMUNE CELLS=-
Infomation provided by Stem Cell Research News (link in first post)...

Both T Cells and Macrophages were given the small interfering RNAs through genetic insertion techniques (they don't give it). First they inserted the siRNA genes into the precursor stem cells then differentiated into the leukocytes: T Cells and Macrophages.

Akkina, Prof. in the Department of Microbio./Immune./Pathology of Colorado State, said - "When challenged with HIV infection, the immune cells showed sustained resistance."

The siRNA genes didn't alter the differentiation process nor the ability of the cells to act as apart of a functional immune system.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=RAPID BONE GROWTH =-
Infomation provided by Stem Cell Research News (link in first post)...

Hadi Aslan of the University of Jerusalem has found how to speed up the regeneration of bone in patients by treating them without having to culture the stem cells! They will not say how since the University plans to make a cash cow out of this.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ADDING ONTO THE NEUROSPHERES (above post)=-
They can culture the cells for more then a year. A Neurosphere is an aggregate of precursor brain cells which, when implanted, can migrate to different parts of the brain -integrate and develop into many of the different kinds of neurons.

The problem of the cells loosing steam was fixed when 3 lines where found to keep growing for 50 weeks. They keep and eye on these nSCs by using the gene chip arrays, which can watch 33,000 genes. They are striving for the idea of customizing neurospheres.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jun 27 2003, 02:28 AM

Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, people of all ages! Hear one and all- For the end of stem cells is upon us!

Just kidding...

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-ESCs SPEAKS OUT WITH SOME BITE!=-

Newswire spoke with Margie Shealy of the Christian Medical Association (CMA) about the American Medical Association's (AMA) pro-somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT). If you read in the article there will be NO mention of the real name for the procedure SCNT because of the faith-based opinion of Margie Shealy.

THE BITE:

QUOTE
"No wonder that only two of every five doctors still belong to the AMA, which in the 1960's used to speak for nearly nine of every ten doctors. With such an increasingly small minority, the AMA obviously no longer speaks for American doctors. And as its recent decision to advocate human embryo-destroying cloning proves, it does not speak for many within its dwindling membership, either."


THE 'PROBLEM':
QUOTE
"We're talking about an organization that actually advocates creating human life for the sole purpose of destroying it through highly speculative, questionable and unethical research. Why not instead devote your resources to promoting ethical adult stem cell research, which is curing real patients without destroying human life?"


Overall the AMA is loosing membership and faith-based personel will be sure to get their "Har har" in the picture.

http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=135-06172003
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=AMA=-

QUOTE
Goldrich said the AMA guidelines "will be helpful for those physicians already doing [stem cell] research," as well as those who have thus far only contemplated it. "There may be some physicians who sat on the sidelines awaiting some sort of guidelines from their professional organization," he said.

Under the guidelines, physicians are free to decide whether to participate in stem cell research or to use products that result from this type of research. This allows physicians uncomfortable with the process the freedom not to participate, Goldrich said


So owners of eggs at the cyropreservation clinics can donate them to research if they want to and scientists who are apart of the AMA can use the stem cells if they want to or not. Yet we still have the same "your killing a human" etc etc riddled all over the article. Anyways, the AMA isn't going under anytime soon and this loss of members can simply be a good step tward seperating the poo from the gems.

http://www.ajc.com/health/content/shared-auto/healthnews/gthr/513740.html
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=JUST FYI=-

The man named Charles Emrick didn't die due to the cardio stem cells injected into his heart.
QUOTE
According to a statement released by Emrick's doctors, Emrick died because of "an acute ischemic event (heart attack) most likely related to his underlying atherosclerotic disease process and repeated cardiac bypass surgeries."


http://www.channelcincinnati.com/health/2283947/detail.html
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=THE HU-MOUSE=-

QUOTE
South Korean researchers said yesterday they had succeeded in developing human embryonic stem cells in the bodies of mice.
Scientists from the institute injected human embryonic stem cells, carrying enhanced green fluorescent proteins (EGFP), into mice embryos. They then transplanted the embryos into the wombs of four mice. They said they succeeded in producing 11 healthy baby mice.
Of the 11 transgenic mice, five had stem-cells bearing EGFP genes in their hearts, livers, kidneys and cartilage. All progeny of the five also had the stem-cell genes.  They are perfect mice except for a few human genes, said Maria's head of research Park Se-Pill.


Well, Im awed.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/06/23/1056220545804.html



_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Bone Marrow Cells Injected into Mice Quickly Cure Diabetes=-

QUOTE
Canadian scientists have discovered that stem cells can trigger regeneration of severely damaged organs in animals, a feat that suggests it may be possible to trick the human body into healing itself.


QUOTE
The scientists injected bone marrow stem cells into diabetic mice, which were cured or back to normal within seven to 14 days. But the "most amazing" finding, said Dr. Bhatia, is that the stem cells triggered the rodents' damaged pancreases to regenerate on their own.


http://canada.com/national/story.asp?id=43DC4D8A-53C9-4625-B224-7621051FD708
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Jul 1 2003, 05:32 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS=-
July 2003 Vol 4 No 7 REVIEW

Nature Reviews Genetics 4, 497 -507 (2003); doi:10.1038/nrg1109
http://www.nature.com/cgi-taf/DynaPage.taf?file=/nrg/journal/v4/n7/abs/nrg1109_fs.html

LOOKING BACK TO THE EMBRYO: DEFINING TRANSCRIPTIONAL NETWORKS IN ADULT MYOGENESIS

Maura H. Parker, Patrick Seale & Michael A. Rudnicki about the authors


Preface

Skeletal muscle has an intrinsic capacity for regeneration following injury or exercise. The presence of adult stem cells in various tissues with myogenic potential provides new opportunities for cell-based therapies to treat muscle disease. Recent studies have shown a conserved transcriptional hierarchy that regulates the myogenic differentiation of both embryonic and adult stem cells.

Importantly, the molecules and signalling pathways that induce myogenic determination in the embryo might be manipulated or mimicked to direct the differentiation of adult stem cells either in vivo or ex vivo.


Summary

1. In response to muscle damage, specialized adult myogenic progenitors known as satellite cells activate a myogenic transcriptional programme, which is analogous to that induced during embryonic and fetal muscle development.

2. Either MyoD or Myf5 is required for the commitment of skeletal myogenic cells; in the absence of both transcription factors, progenitor cells assume non-muscle fates.

3. Pax3 and Myf5 function upstream of MyoD in embryonic myogenesis. Pax3 is required for the proliferation, survival and specification of stem cells in the pre-somitic mesoderm.

4. Shh directly activates Myf5 transcription through specific Gli1 binding sites in the epaxial somite enhancer.

5. Activation of several signalling pathways — including the Wnt, Hedgehog, BMP and Notch cascades — determines the balance between the determination, proliferation, survival and differentiation of muscle progenitors in the somite.

6. Pax7 is required for the development of adult muscle satellite cells that function in the postnatal growth and repair of skeletal muscle fibers.

7. MyoD is required for adult muscle regeneration by promoting the myogenic differentiation of satellite-cell derived myoblasts.

8. The activation or modulation of signalling pathways that are implicated in embryonic and fetal muscle formation might provide a useful therapeutic strategy for the generation of muscle cells from adult stem cells either in vivo or ex vivo.

NATURE REVIEWS | GENETICS
© 2003 Nature Publishing Group
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 3 2003, 01:43 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=PROGRESS IN NEURON PRODUCTION=-
Mon June 30, 2003 05:32 PM ET
By Todd Zwillich
WASHINGTON (Reuters Health) - National Institutes of Health researchers have transformed human embryonic stem cells into cells that function like those lost in patients with Parkinson's disease, an official said Monday.

The official told an NIH panel that the research, which has yet to be published, has produced cells resembling human neurons "in every way."

"There has been some rather notable progress made," Dr. James Battey, chair of NIH's stem cell research task force, told members of an advisory panel to NIH director Dr. Elias Zerhouni.

It is still too early to tell whether the cells will be able to function normally if implanted into a patient's brain, Battey said in a later interview. But so far the cells "look great in the lab."

Battey told the panel that an NIH research team led by Dr. Ronald D.G. McKay used a five-step process to transform human embryonic stem cells into cells that can produce dopamine, the neurochemical lost in patients with Parkinson's disease.

The cells are able to fire the electrical impulses, or action potentials, that normal cells use to communicate with one another, he said.

"These are cells that resemble in every way a dopamine-producing mid-brain cell," said Battey, who also directs NIH's Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD).

McKay, who is chief of laboratory and molecular biology at the National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, did not respond to a request for an interview.

But Battey told NIH officials and advisors that the finding shows that basic research is moving forward under a controversial two-year-old White House directive that limited federal funding for embryonic stem research.

The decision, issued by President Bush on Aug 9, 2001, confined federal funding to embryonic stem cell "lines" that had already been derived by the time of the announcement.

"Many of the studies that are begging to be done can be done right now," Battey said

Bush suggested at the time that the limits would prevent public money from being used to destroy human embryos in order to harvest their stem cells. The decision was controversial, with some scientists and research advocates worrying that the limits would stifle the basic research needed to find new disease cures.

Dr. J. Michael Bishop, an advisory board member and chancellor of the University of California at San Francisco, warned that the limits will keep scientists from working with immunologically diverse cells that will be needed for human implantation.

"We can't keep our head in the sand about the need to develop additional lines," he said. "I just don't want anyone to leave this room thinking that the difficulties ... can be discounted."

Former Sen. Connie Mack, R-Fla., a member of the advisory panel, questioned whether the 71 separate groups of embryos eligible for government-funded research under the rules are enough for long-term research. Only 12 stem cell lines from the 71 separate groups are currently available for researchers to use.

Battey said that McKay's finding, along with another that isolated a chemical factor allowing stem cells to freely differentiate into many cell types, showed that basic research is advancing even with limits set by Bush.

However, he also cautioned that the usefulness of the lines for later clinical research "remains a huge question mark."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Embryo Cell Research Legal In Australia’s NSW=-
Wednesday 2 July 2003, 10:05 AM

NSW parliament has passed historic legislation to govern the use of human embryonic stem cells in medical research.

The legislation brings NSW in line with national laws.

In a conscience vote, members of the Legislative Council voted down an amendment which would have banned embryo use by a margin of 22 to 15.

The amendment was proposed by the Reverend Fred Nile.

Science and Medical Research Minister Frank Sartor said the government would monitor the controversial practice.

"This bill creates a strict regulatory framework that will set the rules for embryonic stem cell research," Mr Sartor said.

"NSW has now adopted a position that is nationally consistent and gives certainty to researchers striving for new therapies and cures in the fields of diabetes, spinal cord injury and Alzheimer's disease.

"The new laws also set down strict rules that restrict embryo utilisation to bona fide IVF practices and that would otherwise be destroyed."

©2003 AAP
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Funding of embryo cell research in EU is a GO!=-
The Commission is expected today, Tuesday 1 July, to agree on guidelines that will allow the funding of research involving the use of embryonic stem cells, despite strong moral objections.

The decision comes against a background of division in European countries over the ethics of taking and manipulating cells from an embryo - a practice which results in the death of what some consider to be a human life - and the scientific and life saving benefits which the practice may yield.

The UK has long carried out stem cell research while Ireland, Portugal, Germany – the biggest contributor to the EU budget and Italy – current holders of the EU presidency – all oppose the practice.

Critics have argued medical tests show adult stem cell research and umbilical cord blood transplants work just as well, but supporters say adult cells are not as malleable and insufficient work has yet been done to say if adult cells are as useful.

Balancing act
Across the Atlantic, US president George W Bush has placed stringent controls on the use of the federal budget to fund such research but has stopped short of an outright ban.

The Commission is expected to give the go-ahead to fund research with stems left over from, or extracted but not suitable, for fertility treatment.

The decision is likely to cause consternation in the European Parliament, which voted in April to ban the practice. This blanket ban however was not accepted by member states who asked the Commission to simply regulate its funding of such projects.

Under the Commission's guidelines, money from Italy or Germany, for example could not be used to fund research in those countries, however as contributors to a collective EU budget they may be funding research in other counties.

Written by Andrew Beatty
Edited by Honor Mahony

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-

Well AU and Eu are doing the right thing by funding and allowing ESCs to be researched and understood because we all know epigentics are everything when it comes to this field of research.

As for the "fully functional" neurons, that gives a good feeling to know there are researchers out there making sure we get what we want.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Jul 10 2003, 11:42 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE BRAIN=-
More interesting findings.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/acurian/20030709/hl_acurian/stem_like_cells_restore_function_in_rats_with_severe_stroke&e=2

Stem-Like Cells Restore Function in Rats With Severe Stroke
Tue Jul 8, 8:00 PM ET

Source: University of South Florida Health Sciences Center

Rats with severe strokes recovered function following intravenous injections of stem-like cells obtained from circulating human blood -- a finding that points to another potential cell therapy for stroke.

The study, by researchers at the University of South Florida Center of Excellence for Aging and Brain Repair, appears in tthe July 7, 2003, issue of the journal Cell Transplantation.

The human blood donors were injected with granulocyte stimulating factor (G-CSF) to stimulate the release of stem-like cells from their bone marrow into the bloodstream before a blood sample was collected. These stem-like cells are known as peripheral blood progenitor cells.

"This is the first demonstration that G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood cells promote functional recovery after a stroke," said Alison Willing, PhD, assistant professor of neurosurgery and first author of the study. "We were putting these cells into animals 24 hours after a stroke and seeing significant behavioral improvement. The animals behaved almost normally on our tests, just as they had before the stroke. That's pretty amazing."

G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood cells have become an alternative treatment to bone marrow transplants for patients with blood cancers. They are easier to obtain, lead to faster recovery from chemotherapy and better survival.

Dr. Willing and her colleagues wanted to explore whether G-CSF treated peripheral blood cells might also be a treatment for central nervous system disorders. For the last few years, the USF Center for Aging and Brain Repair has been investigating alternatives to human embryonic stem cells, such as adult bone marrow stem cells and human umbilical cord blood (HUCB) cells, as treatments for stroke, spinal cord injury and other neurological disorders.

"Our findings suggest that mobilized peripheral blood cells might be a good candidate for early treatment of central nervous system disorders like stroke," said Paul R. Sanberg, PhD, DSc, professor of neurosurgery and director of the USF Center for Aging and Brain Repair. "They appear to be more readily accessible and easier to isolate than bone marrow and, like bone marrow, could be donated by patients for their own use."

In an editorial accompanying the USF study, authors Cesar Borlongan, PhD, and David Hess, MD, both of the Medical College of Georgia, also suggest that a patient's own peripheral blood stem cells might be a source of cell therapy for stroke. "Administration of G-CSF itself (an already FDA (news - web sites)- approved drug) may mobilize progenitor cells from the bone marrow compartment into the peripheral blood where they can 'home' to the brain and have a protective or restorative effect. This would avoid the need to isolate cells and reinject them."

For this pilot study, the USF team compared the effect of G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood cells with that of HUCB cells in a rat model for severe stroke. An earlier report by researchers at USF and Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit reported that intravenous injections of HUCB cells helped rats recover from strokes faster.

The USF team looked at three groups of rats induced to have symptoms of stroke. The first group was intravenously injected with G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood cells 24 hours after a stroke. These cells were collected from the circulating blood of human blood donors through a process known as leukapheresis. Because the donors had received G-CSF before their blood was drawn, the resulting blood sample included a larger-than-normal population of immature, undifferentiated cells with the capacity to become any cell in the body, including neurons.

The second group was intravenously injected with HUCB cells 24 hours after the stroke.

The third group, a control, received no cellular treatment.

The researchers found that, following cell therapy, the stroke-induced hyperactive behavior of the rats was reduced to a pre-stroke level of normal activity. The improvement was similar whether the rats had been treated with peripheral blood cells or HUCB cells. Unlike humans, who are often paralyzed following a severe stroke, rats typically become abnormally active.

In addition, both the G-CSF stimulated peripheral blood cells and HUCB cells prevented the rats from developing stroke-associated motor asymmetry -- the favoring of one side over another. The control rats displayed a significant increase in motor bias following stroke.

The researchers are unsure how these peripheral blood cells improve functional recovery, but they suspect the transplanted cells may secrete protective substances that prevent further brain damage rather than replacing already damaged neurons. One month, the length of the USF study, likely was not enough time for a stem-like peripheral blood cell to change into a replacement neuron and sprout functioning fibers in the brain, Dr. Willing said.

Dr. Willing and her colleagues are continuing to try to determine how the peripheral blood cells work, as well as the optimal time, method and number of cells to deliver following a stroke.


Copyright © 2003 Acurian Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Visit www.acurian.com for more information on new and emerging medical therapies and clinical trial enrollment opportunities in your condition(s) of interest. Sign up for customized email updates and visit our one-of-a-kind Quick Results Center at http://www.acurian.com/patient
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 16 2003, 03:02 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=FURTHERING UNDERSTANDING OF hNSCs=-
http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=114052065&Page=1

Findings could improve retinal and other nervous system transplants

Intro:
Most tissues when transplanted from one body to another are seen by the recipient as foreign and attacked by the immune system. This is because the transplanted tissue has molecules on its surface called antigens that are recognized by the immune system as "not self." If the immune response goes unchecked by drugs to inhibit the attack, it will eventually destroy the transplanted tissue and reject it.

Michael Young and his colleagues chose a part of the body that always rejects transplanted tissue without immunosuppressant drugs and without close tissue typing the kidney capsule, the pouch in which the kidney is located. This pouch is commonly used to determine whether transplants can survive. Over the years scientists have tested skin, cornea and other tissues in the kidney capsule to evaluate their transplant potential.
End Intro.

"These findings are very exciting," says Michael Young, PhD, the lead author of the study and an assistant scientist at Schepens Eye Research Institute and assistant professor at Harvard Medical School. "Though we suspected brain stem cells might be protected in this way, this is the first documented evidence."

There are sites in the body that do not mount attacks against foreign tissue because to do so would be too self-destructive. For instance, in the eye an all out immune attack would cause inflammation that would destroy delicate tissue and, with it, vision. These sites, which are known as "immune privileged," include the eye, the brain, the digestive system, and the reproductive system.

Conclusion:
Young, who in previous research found that brain and retinal stem cells transplanted into the eyes of mice and rats seemed to survive longer and integrate more easily into damaged retinas than other cells, suspected that these "neural stem cells" might be immune privileged. The only way for him to learn the true nature of their immune properties was to transplant these neural stem cells to a part of the recipients body that, unlike the eye, was not immune privileged already.

They concluded that these neural stems cells did not induce an immune response and must be invisible to the immune system, at least initially. The next step was to determine if the cells possessed the antigens that most other tissues had. To test this theory, the team took other brain cells (not stem cells) from the green mice and implanted them in the normal non-green mice. These cells were rejected, and when brain stem cells were then again implanted in the normal non-green mice, they, too were rejected. The team concluded, therefore, that the brain stem cells did possess antigens, but unless the recipient was primed or pre-immunized, the antigens were not visible to the immune system of the recipient and not rejected.
End Conclusion.

Extra:
"Understanding the immune properties of these stem cells could have an enormous effect on how we perform brain or retinal transplantations in the future. Stem cells already have the advantage of being able to transform or differentiate into various types of cells and can be reproduced endlessly outside the body. Now we know that at least brain stem cells are immune privileged and can be used without the same worry about tissue matching or immunosuppression that is true for other types of tissue. Young is the director of Schepens Eye Research Institute's Minda de Gunzburg Retinal Transplantation Research Center. The center is committed, with a focus on retinal regeneration, to unlocking the mysteries of vision and finding the cures for blinding eye diseases that devastate millions in the United States and around the world.

The study, titled "Neural progenitor cells lack immunogenicity and resist destruction as allografts" can be obtained at the Stems Cells website at http://stemcells.alphamedpress.org/ or by emailing pattijacobs@hotmail.com or mikey@vision.eri.harvard.edu.

Other members of the research team include Junko Hori, Tat Fong Ng, Marie Shatos, and J. Wayne Streilein of Schepens Eye Research Institute of Boston and Henry Klassen of the Stem Cell Research Program at Children's Hospital of Orange County in Orange, California.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=FYI=-
I did move the article around to make a nice intro and conclusion, easier reading.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Jul 16 2003, 05:19 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE LIVER=-
Stem cells found to home toward the injured liver
The now recognized plasticity of stem cells challenges researchers to further define the mechanisms responsible for their recruitment and differentiation, so that they may ultimately become clinically useful in the repair of injured organs.
In the July 15 issue of The Journal of Clinical Investigation, a collaborative research team led by Tsvee Lapidot and colleagues at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel, and also including researchers from the Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Mount Sinai Medical Center in New York, Institut Pasteur in Paris, and the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Israel, have reported a study that greatly contributes to our understanding of how hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) home to injured liver tissue and contribute to tissue repair. The authors reveal that migration of HSCs to the liver is a selective, non-random event, requiring the expression of the signaling chemokine SDF-1 and the receptor CXCR4. The pathways that facilitate crosstalk between HSCs and injured liver tissue may serve as targets for future therapeutic protocols in the field of liver regeneration and transplantation.

https://www.the-jci.org/press/17902.pdf
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: BruceKlein Jul 16 2003, 01:05 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=FURTHERING UNDERSTANDING OF hNSCs=-
Brain stem cells are not rejected when transplanted

Science Blog - For the first time scientists have shown that brain stem cells are immune privileged, which means that they are invisible to a transplant recipient's immune system and do not trigger the immune system to reject them. These results, published in the July issue of Stem Cells, indicate that using central nervous system stem cells in transplants for diseases of the eye (which is part of the brain), brain, and spinal cord, may eliminate the need for tissue typing before, and immunosuppressive drugs after, transplantation. Ultimately these findings promise to improve the success of retinal transplantation to regenerate vision for millions with macular degeneration, retinitis pigmentosa and diabetic retinopathy and brain transplants to restore functioning for patients with disorders such as Parkinson's disease.

http://www.scienceblog.com/community/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1828
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 16 2003, 10:38 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Nanog RETURNS!=-

IN THE NEWS
Eternal youth


Arianne Heinrichs

Scientists from UK and Japan have discovered a major new player in maintaining the immortality of embryonic stem (ES) cells. This breakthrough might one day allow scientists to turn any cell into an immortal, pluripotent cell that can be used for therapeutic purposes.

Shinya Yamanaka and his colleagues, from the Nara Institute of Science and Technology, and Austin Smith's group, at the Institute for Stem Cell Research in Edinburgh, independently identified a gene that was expressed specifically in pluripotent, undifferentiated cells. They named the gene Nanog — after the mythological Celtic land of the ever-young, Tir nan Og.

In two papers in Cell, the scientists showed that overexpression of Nanog prevented ES cells from differentiating. What is exciting is that Nanog seems to be a key factor in the transcription-factor network that is known to be required for the ES cell phenotype.

"As we know more and more about pluripotency, it probably will be possible to reprogram cells to make stem cells out of any cell in the body," said James Thomson, the University of Wisconsin scientist who first isolated human embryonic stem cells in 1998 (Washington Post, 30th May 2003).

Although most of their experiments involved using the mouse version of Nanog in mouse cells, some involved the human version, which was identified thanks to its structural similarity to mouse Nanog. "If Nanog has the same effect in humans as we have found in mice, this will be a key step in the developing embryonic stem cells for medical treatments," said Austin Smith (New Scientist, 30th May 2003).
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=FYI=-
Nanog was discovered a while ago (~January 2002 in Science News reported the discovery in murine models) but NOW it is being found to be a player in ES fate determination.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 18 2003, 02:33 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Stem Cells Bring Countries Together=-



Stem Cells International Policy Discussion

The Medical Research Council convened an international policy discussion on stem cells on 7 January 2003, to bring together nine international research agencies that have already shown an interest in working together to further stem cell research.

Prospects that stem cell research offers for:

[>] generating new insights into fundamental cell biology and developmental processes
[>] developing cell-based treatments to repair or replace human tissues damaged through injuries
[>] treating a wide range of serious degenerative diseases that affect millions of people world-wide and for which there are currently no cures

Objectives of the meeting were to:

[>] encourage collaborative research across nations, boundaries and disciplines
[>] encourage sharing of resources and data and fully capitalize on the existing available human stem cell lines
[>] identify key research gaps and address these by capitalizing on national strengths
[>] identify funding schemes that facilitate transnational collaborations

The countries and agencies involved were:

1.) Medical Research Council, UK
2.) Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities
3.) Canadian Institutes of Health Research
4.) National Institutes of Health, USA
5.) National University of Singapore
6.) Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation, USA
7.) National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia
8.) Academy of Finland
9.) Scientific Council for Medicine, Swedish Research Council

Prof. Sir George Radda, Chief Executive of the Medical Research Council, said: "This has been a very constructive day for stem cell research and international scientific collaboration, laying the foundation for a global approach to cutting edge research.

"The agencies from around the world that met in London today recognize the long-term potential of stem cell research for human health, but are also aware of the concerns raised by new ethical challenges in this type of research".

Sir George summary:

Two expert working groups would be set up; one would look at the requirements of stem cell research, which would include stem cell line characterization, and the second would look at facilitating further discussion for country-specific ethical issues.
A website would be created through which information on training events for those in the field would be channeled.
The group would keep abreast of international intellectual property issues and deal with them at an appropriate time

The group has also agreed to meet again in six months to review these outcomes in the light of new information that will become available.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-

Age-related Stem Cell Decline Might Explain Heart Problems
Dwayne Hunter
Betterhumans Staff
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, 12:50:08 PM CT

Researchers from Duke University Medical Center have now demonstrated that age-related loss of stem cells that continually repair blood vessel damage is critical to the onset and progression of atherosclerosis.

"Our studies indicate that the inability of bone marrow to produce progenitor cells which repair and rejuvenate the lining of the arteries drives the process of atherosclerosis and the formation of plaques in the arteries," he says.

Mice with high cholesterol

A Duke study to appear in the July 29 issue of the journal Circulation, published online yesterday (read abstract), used mice experiments to better understand atherosclerosis -- one of the leading causes of death and illness in the US.

The Duke team examined stem cells know as bone-marrow-derived vascular progenitor cells with the intention of injecting them into patients to forestall or prevent the development of atherosclerosis.

Another option would be to induce a patient's own stem cells to differentiate into progenitor cells.

In the experiment, the researchers bred mice to develop atherosclerosis and high cholesterol levels. Over a 14-week period these mice were injected with bone marrow cells from normal mice.

After 14 weeks, a 40% to 60% decrease in the number of lesions in the aorta -- the main artery carrying blood from the heart -- was detected in the treated mice.

Specific staining techniques on the aortas helped researchers determine that the bone marrow cells "homed in" on areas where atherosclerotic lesions were most common.


Migration and differentiation

Not only did the bone marrow cells migrate to where they were needed most, but they also differentiated into the proper cell types -- endothelial cells that line arteries and the smoother muscle cells beneath the endothelium that help strengthen the arteries.

The researchers also found that bone marrow cells from older mice were less able to prevent atherosclerosis than those of younger mice.


"This finding suggests that with aging, cells capable of preventing atherosclerosis that are normally present in the bone marrow became deficient in the older mice that had developed atherosclerosis," says Goldschmidt.

The finding could have implications beyond heart conditions and their treatment. Loss of rejuvenating cells could also be a contributor to a broad range of age-related disorders that includes rheumatoid arthritis and chronic liver disease.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-

So we have countries now working on establishing fluid research so findings don't overlap which will theoretically result in faster research. And we have a direct confirmation, of a specific tissue system, relying on stem cells to maintain health. For the latter: like we didn't already suspect this but hey, its always better to have the papers to shove around. The End.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 22 2003, 05:05 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ESC, a quick revisit=-
Problems:

*Safest route is to do the many injections - no one will do this

*murineESCs derived from SCNT have been shown to cause cancer

*reverting cells in your body to a less differentiated form, via solution injection, could kill you

*keeping around your original cells could lead to cancers

Goals to look for:

*Stem Cell Biologists and Nuclear Reprogrammers working to make 'your' pluripotent SCs, derived from somatic cell nuclear transfer, add to the stem cells stock when injected into the body.

*The Nanog gene, if up-regulated, will keep ESCs from differentiating (Nanog medium till transplant?)

*Make the ESCs derived from SCNT more plasticit (up-regulate sensitivity)

*Understand why there is that nasty possibility of cancer

*Add in mods (more XP proteins) also when we understand the cancer beating mice (see below) we should take the model and utilize it in our cells

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

After thinking about the problem of uncontrolled cell growth for using undifferentiated embrionics I looked around and found a paper on the subject and one dealing with a problem like tumors.

On stemcells.com there is a paper titled: Selective Ablation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells Expressing a "Suicide" Gene by
Maya Schuldinera et al which talks about them genetically engineered human ES cell lines to express the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene. This gene is sensitive to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved drug ganciclovir, inducing destruction of HSV-tk+ cells at ganciclovir concentrations that are nonlethal to other cell types. Using this they were able to transplant in mice and control a cancerous growth.

Approaches to Utilize Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells (MPC) as Cellular Vehicles by L. Pereboevaa et al give an approach to body gaurdians.

Nice sum up:

QUOTE
MPCs expressing thymidine kinase were able to exert a bystander killing effect on the cancer cell line SKOV3ip1 in vitro. In addition, we found that MPCs were able to support Ad replication, and thus can be used as cell vectors to deliver oncolytic viruses. Our results show that MPCs can foster expression of suicide genes or support replication of adenoviruses as potential anticancer therapeutic payloads. These findings are consistent with the concept that MPCs possess key properties that ensure their employment as cellular vehicles and can be used to deliver either therapeutic genes or viruses to tumor sites.


A research paper published in Cancer Research October 15th 2002 had interesting results. Brain stem cells, when injected into a brain tumor, can follow the fragments that break off. So the nSCs were upregulated in interleukin 12 production (immune-stimulation) - mice recovered and 30% were immune to brain cancers.

As for an example of how we should model new designer stem cells which can beat cancers, the http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/2982525.stm will prove useful.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 22 2003, 05:30 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Oh, Yea=-

The post on the Stem cells uniting countries looks like it united 9 countries but its 12. Sweden, Netherlands, Finland, Singapore, Isael, Japan, France, Germany, Australia, Canada, US and UK. Can we say "Big Guns."

Geron made osteoblasts (bone forming cells) from ESCs. (shrug)
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Jul 29 2003, 11:46 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Neural Stem Cell Breakthrough Understaning=-

From Bio.com...
Nitric Oxide regulates stem cell division in the adult brain; Strategy seen for repairing brain damage caused by neurodegenerative disease and stroke

Most neurons in the mammalian brain are produced during embryonic development. However, several regions of the adult brain continue to spawn large numbers of neurons through the proliferation of neural stem cells. Moreover, it is becoming clear that these new neurons are integrated into existing brain circuitry.

Now, researchers at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory have discovered that a molecule called nitric oxide (NO) is a pivotal, natural regulator of the birth of new neurons in the adult brain. The study, published in this week's issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, shows that blocking nitric oxide production stimulates neural stem cell proliferation and hence dramatically increases the number of neurons that are generated in the brains of adult rats.

Importantly, the new neurons that arise as a consequence of blocking nitric oxide production display properties of normal neurons, and they appear to contribute directly to the architecture of the adult brain. The study suggests that modulating nitric oxide levels might be an effective strategy for replacing neurons that are lost from the brain due to stroke or chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and Huntington's disease.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Funding=-

From scotsman.com

Stem Cell Sciences raises £2.35m for research

A BIOTECHNOLOGY company with bases in Edinburgh and Australia has bucked the industry’s funding drought by raising £2.35 million to expand its research to find new treatments for Parkinson’s Disease and diabetes.

Stem Cell Sciences is likely to use some of the funding to begin experimenting with cloned human embryos, using a similar technique to the one that created Dolly the Sheep.

The company has attracted joint financial support of £1.15m from the Archangels syndicate and Scottish Enterprise’s Co-Investment Fund, and £1.2m from BioTech Capital, one of Australia’s largest life sciences private equity funds. Funds committed in Scotland and Australia will be spent in their respective territories.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Spain Jumps In=-

Spain Approves Stem Cell Research, with Conditions

MADRID (Reuters) - Predominantly Catholic Spain authorized the use of embryonic stem cells for research on Friday, but said only embryos left over from fertilization treatment could be used, and only with the parents' consent.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 1 2003, 09:32 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Neural Stem Cells, Why Do You Die?=-

from bio.com - I moved the article around to highlight points...

Stem cell death gives clue to brain cell survival

Opening:
"During embryonic development, we would like to know how stem cell death is regulated because we know it needs to be regulated," says Dr. Bieberich. "You don't want the whole brain dying or overgrowing. You have to find a balance. How is that balanced maintained? What are the secrets for that?

Middle:
At a certain point in cell division, just before neurons begin forming, there is massive production of proteins and up-regulation of lipids. During that phase, decisions are made about which daughter cells get what composition of lipids and proteins, decisions that affect the cells' future function.

Typically at this point in division, the two daughter cells birthed from a single stem cell will have the same makeup and the same ultimate purpose.

Yet in a subpopulation of the stem cells involved in brain development, the scientists have documented increasing levels of ceramide in both resulting daughter cells while its death partner, PAR-4, gets handed off to only half the cells.

Cells destined to survive, and likely further divide and differentiate, are handed instead a protein called nestin. "Nestin is a marker for a particular stage of neuronal development," says Dr. Bieberich. "Nestin-bearing cells will develop into neural cells such as our neurons or astrocytes or other cells. So it makes sense that the cells that inherit nestin, but not PAR-4, will survive and develop into normal neuronal cells whereas the other ones will die."

End:
"We all know that even in adulthood, we have stem cells in the brain and they may be able to repair damaged areas," says Dr. Bieberich. "But if the same cell death mechanisms are still active, there will not be an increase in the number of stem cells because always one cell will die and one will survive. Maybe we can control this and increase the number of endogenous stem cells.

"Also during the neurodegeneration that occurs in diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's, we have a lot of cell death going on and we would like to know what signals are involved that make those brain cells die. They may be very similar or even exactly the same as the ones we investigate with our embryonic mouse stem cells."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Aug 2 2003, 01:44 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-
Hey DH have you changed your name to carboniX?

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 2 2003, 07:01 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-
Yes, I have been meaning to change the name and the little incident with Alex R. reminded me. I have shifted from promoter dynamics to molecular alterations - in this case improving GG-NER/TC-NER. Of course this has me now engrossing in heavy organic chem. The End. [g:)]

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Aug 7 2003, 10:50 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=GENETICS OF STEM CELLS: Vascularization=-
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/uonc-usi080703.php

UNC studies identify key genes involved in blood vessel development

CHAPEL HILL -- New research from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill has identified two genes that play key roles in regulating blood vessel development.
The research appears in two reports published in the Aug. 15 issue of Molecular and Cellular Biology, a professional journal. Dr. Cam Patterson, professor of medicine and director of the Carolina Cardiovascular Biology Center and a member of the UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, led both studies.

Both research papers focus on angiogenesis, the molecular program by which endothelial cells lining blood vessels develop or differentiate from their precursor stem cells.

"I think of endothelial cells as the 'intelligent cells' of blood vessels," Patterson said. "They are communicators between the blood vessel wall and bloodstream. They are the cells that determine what a blood vessel does. For example, during angiogenesis, when new blood vessels are being formed, it's the endothelial cells that determine where they go and how big they get."

And as communicators, Patterson added, endothelial cells also help determine what passes through the blood-brain barrier, through the endothelium and into the brain, and what does not.

"One study in this issue of the journal sheds important new light on the molecular process that prevents a particular cell type from overrunning the developing embryo," Patterson said. "The findings from this study also offer tantalizing possibilities for new treatments aimed at putting the brakes on blood vessel development in tumors and other disorders having important vascular growth components, such as diabetes."

The second paper focuses on what activates the endothelial cell program, and it reports having found a possible answer in a single protein, a known transcription factor that has never been characterized functionally.

"This has really been a 'holy grail' finding for us," Patterson said. "No other research group has found a single transcription factor that by itself is both necessary and sufficient to activate the endothelial cell program." For the first study, co-authors were Patterson and School of Medicine research colleagues Drs. Martin Moser, Olav Binder, Yaxu Wu, Julius Aitsebaomo, Rongqin Ren, Victoria Bautch and Frank L. Conlon. Dr. Christoph Bode of Freiburg University in Germany also served as co-author. The study team discovered a gene they called BMPER for BMP-binding endothelial precursor-derived regulator. The molecule was found using "a sophisticated molecular approach to separate out endothelial cell precursors from non-endothelial cell cells in a stem-cell model," Patterson said.

In a series of experiments, the researchers demonstrated that only endothelial cells and their precursors express the BMPER gene. Endothelial cells secrete the protein as they differentiate, issuing a molecular "stop" order to inhibit further differentiation.

"This was shown very clearly when we used stem cells to generate endothelial cells and then added BMPER. We found that BMPER inhibited the whole process," Patterson said.

In the second study, co-authors Wu, Moser, Bautch and Patterson looked at the gene flk1, a molecular marker for early endothelial cell precursors. "Flk1 is important because it's a receptor for vascular endothelial growth factor, which is an angiogenic factor," Patterson said.

"But it's also important to us because it's the first gene that gets turned on in endothelial progenitor cells. So we wanted to know what transcription factors turn on flk1 and are those factors themselves sufficient enough to turn on the whole endothelial cell gene program - that is, can you use those factors to take a precursor cell and turn it into an endothelial cell?"

The study team used a screening procedure (yeast-1 hybrid screen) in which a piece of DNA was employed as a kind of bait to screen a library containing a variety of transcription factors.

"And the protein we pulled out with the bait is called HOXB5, a transcription factor that's known but that has never been functionally characterized," Patterson said.

The researchers then asked whether HOXB5 would increase expression of flk1 by binding to genetic regulatory elements in the gene. "And indeed that was the case in our in vitro studies," Patterson said. "But the really important findings came when we over-expressed HOXB5 in stem cells. We used a stem cell model developed a few years ago here at UNC and found we could double or triple the number of flk1-positive cells that were produced from stem cells.

"But most importantly, if we look at actual vessel formation in stem cell cultures, we found vessel formation is hugely increased." Thus, the findings indicate that simply over-expressing HOXB5 by itself not only increases expression of the regulatory protein, but also increases the number of endothelial cells that will form from the precursors.

"We're especially excited about the possibility that we can use this transcription factor to create renewable populations of endothelial cell precursors. I think this will be very important, as it would be analogous to hematopoietic (blood cell-forming) stem cells," Patterson said.

"And if we can create an analogous endothelial stem cell line, we can use that for gene therapy applications, for example, as a regenerative therapy for aged blood vessels.

"The therapeutic potentials for this research are many."

A grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, a component of the National Institutes of Health, supported this research.


###
Note: Contact Patterson at 919-843-6477 or cpatters@med.unc.edu.
School of Medicine contact: Les Lang, 919-843-9687 or llang@med.unc.edu.

By LESLIE H. LANG
UNC School of Medicine
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Aug 7 2003, 11:07 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=nSTEM CELL PRODUCTION=-
Creation of new neurons critical to antidepressant action in mice

Blocking the formation of neurons in the hippocampus blocks the behavioral effects of antidepressants in mice, say researchers funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Their finding lends new credence to the proposed role of such neurogenesis in lifting mood. It also helps to explain why antidepressants typically take a few weeks to work, note Rene Hen, Ph.D., Columbia University, and colleagues, who report on their study in the August 8th Science.

"If antidepressants work by stimulating the production of new neurons, there's a built-in delay," explained Hen, a grantee of NIH's National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) and National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA). "Stem cells must divide, differentiate, migrate and establish connections with post-synaptic targets – a process that takes a few weeks."

"This is an important new insight into how antidepressants work," added NIMH director Thomas Insel, M.D. "We have known that antidepressants influence the birth of neurons in the hippocampus. Now it appears that this effect may be important for the clinical response."

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/niom-con080403.php
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 11 2003, 08:08 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=NIH's: Stem Cells: Scientific Progress and Future Research Directions Online Book=-

I admit that I haven't gone over all the chapters in this recently updated online book (I think it would be called that) but they put in a lot of time to make this a great resource for understanding ESCs. Its in PDFs.



http://stemcells.nih.gov/stemcell/scireport.asp

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Aug 11 2003, 10:23 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE LIVER=-
Public release date: 11-Aug-2003

Contact: Alex Smith
Alex_smith@margeotes.com
212-460-0563
Weizmann Institute


Weizmann Institute scienists find that stem cells in the bone marrow become liver cells
They still don't have a personality, and they're waiting for the maturity call. Stem cells in our bone marrow usually develop into blood cells, replenishing our blood system. However, in states of emergency, the destiny of some of these stem cells may change: They can become virtually any type of cell – liver cells, muscle cells, nerve cells – responding to the body's needs.
Prof. Tsvee Lapidot and Dr. Orit Kollet of the Weizmann Institute's Immunology Department have found how the liver, when damaged, sends a cry for help to these stem cells. "When the liver becomes damaged, it signals to stem cells in the bone marrow, which rush to it and help in its repair – as liver cells," says Lapidot. His research team has found that certain molecules that govern normal development of the liver become overproduced when it is damaged, signaling to the stem cells in the bone marrow to come to the site. The scientists were able to pinpoint the signaling molecules – HGF, MMP-9 and SDF-1– and describe the homing process. HGF is involved in liver cell development and, in irregular cases, can play a role in cancer metastasis. MMP-9 assists cell migration from the blood system into various types of tissue, including liver tissue. SDF-1 is a molecule that stem cells are attracted to. The scientists discovered that large amounts of HGF and MMP-9, when overproduced in the damaged liver, enter the blood flow and increase the sensitivity of stem cells in the bone marrow to SDF-1. Suddenly able to sense SDF-1's calling signal from the liver (which itself is amplified due to increased production and distribution of SDF-1), the stem cells migrate from the bone marrow into the blood and navigate their way to the liver. The findings could lead to new insights into organ repair and transplants, especially liver-related ones. They may also uncover a whole new stock of stem cells that can under certain conditions become liver cells. Until a few years ago only embryonic stem cells were thought to possess such capabilities. Understanding how stem cells in the bone marrow turn into liver cells could one day be a great boon to liver repair as well as an alternative to the use of embryonic stem cells.


###
Prof. Tsvee Lapidot's research is supported by the Concern Foundation, Beverly Hills, CA; Ms. Rhoda Goldstein, Nanuet, NY; Levine Institute of Applied Science; M.D. Moross Institute for Cancer Research; Ms. Nora Peisner, Hungtington, MI; and Gabrielle Rich Center for Transplantation Biology Research.

http://www.eurekalert.org/bysubject/medicine.php

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Aug 12 2003, 12:13 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-

The links in the article are worth pursuing.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030811/01

August 11, 2003

Mending broken hearts
Rat mesenchymal stem cells modified to express Akt show potential for the regeneration of the heart | By David Secko

Human cardiac disease involving a disruption of blood flow, for example, in myocardial infarction, initiates a process in which heart muscle cells (the myocardium) die. Natural repair mechanisms do exist, including an enlargement of the heart, an increase in the number of cells present, and the traveling of bone-marrow–derived stem cells (BMCs) to effect some repair, but none are effective in the long term. To effect additional repair, harvesting and direct injection of BMCs and mesenchymal stems cells (MSCs) into ischemic myocardium has been undertaken. This has met with partial success and is partly explained by the poor viability of the transplanted cells.

In the August 10 Nature Medicine, Abeel A. Mangi and colleagues at Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School genetically engineered MSCs designed to overcome previous problems with cell death during transplantation into infarcted hearts (Nature Medicine, DOI:10.1038/nm912, August 10, 2003).

Mangi et al. grew large quantities of adult rat MSCs in mixed culture with hematopoietic cells and purified the MSCs > 99.9% using preferential attachment to polystyrene surfaces and negative paramagnetic bead sorting. The purified MSCs were then genetically modified with the use of retroviruses to express a murine version of the cell survival protein Akt in order that the cells would not undergo apoptosis upon transplantation into infracted hearts. They observed that Akt-expressing MSCs showed an 80% reduction in apoptosis in vitro after 24 hours of hypoxia and also observed this effect in vivo through the injection of 5 x 106 Akt MSCs into myocardial infarcted female rats. The injected MSCs developed into cardiac myocyte-like cells in a manner restricted to injured myocardium, since it was not observed in uninjured tissue. This injection was also associated with regeneration of lost myocardial volume, normalized cardiac function, and the prevention of pathological remodeling, all pointing to improved cardiac function resulting from the Akt MSCs.

"We speculate that future therapy for acute myocardial infarction may involve transplantation of MSCs overexpressing Akt to facilitate the repair of the damaged heart," conclude the authors. The genetic engineering of stem cells, perhaps encompassing a combination of gene and cell therapy, may hold great potential for effective treatments involving regenerative medicine.
Links for this article
R.S. Williams et al., "Protective responses in the ischemic myocardium," Journal Clinical Investigation, 106:813-818, October 2000.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/pubmed/11018066

D. Orlic et al., "Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium," Nature, 410:701-705, April 5, 2001.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/pubmed/11287958

A.A. Mangi et al., "Mesenchymal stem cells modified with Akt prevent remodeling and restore performance of infracted hearts," Nature Medicine, DOI:10.1038/nm912, August 10, 2003.
http://www.nature.com/nm/

Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School
http://www.brighamandwomens.org/

S.R. Datta et al., "Cellular survival: a play in three Akts," Genes and Development, 13:2905-2927, November 15, 1999.
http://www.biomedcentral.com/pubmed/10579998
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 16 2003, 08:06 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Rabbits and China: Semi-Hu-Rabs...something like that?=-

China biologists are using rabbit eggs to help make...or try to make, some non-controversial ESCs. Course thats not going to work out either.

The cells from the rabbit/human product won't divide immortal-like. And the religious or "the nature's way" people will be pissy of course.

Also TalkOrigins.org has a http://www.talkorigins.org/origins/postmonth/jul03.html#hon article that talks about how science is hard to understand but the public should have some VALID understanding of some of the common themes. Or I'm just posting this because it makes me feel better knowing someone else is saying science is tricky, besides me. [lol]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 20 2003, 07:06 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=nSCs and Their Future Part in Biomedical Sciences: Meeting=-
Potential Role of Stem Cells in the Discovery of New Drugs to be Addressed at October 14-15 Meeting
Wednesday August 20, 8:51 am ET


NEW YORK, Aug. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- The prospective role of human neural stem cells in the screening of potential pharmaceutical compounds will be presented as part of an industrial stem cell and regenerative therapeutic research meeting to be held this October in Princeton, NJ, announces Strategic Research Institute.
Following two highly successful events, the third annual meeting features researchers from the stem cell industry's leading biotech and biopharmaceutical companies as well as pioneering scientists from academia as they present their most recent data.

Topics to be covered Human Embryonic Stem Cells, Cord Blood Derived and Bone Marrow Stem Cells, CNS Stem Cell Transdifferentiation and Transplantation, Implications for Drug Discovery, Bioethics of Stem Cell Research, and Commercial and Federal Regulatory Implications for the Pharmaceutical and Biotech Industries.

Over 25 companies including Geron Corporation, Stem Cell Sciences, Bresagen, NeuralStem, Neuronyx, NeuroNova, Osiris Therapeutics, Genzyme Corporation, Thrombogenics, and many others will discuss their role in stem cell research to an broad audience comprised of pharmaceutical, academic and biotech researchers and executives.

To register, request announcement, and/or for sponsorship/exhibition information, please contact Steve J. Kuperberg at skuperberg@srinstitute.com

(Please include company/university and mailing address) Registration is available online at
www.srinstitute.com/cs254/register.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Strategic Research Institute
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Aug 20 2003, 08:05 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELL COMPATIBILITY ISSUE=-
Geron was also in today's news with respect to a previous post AND happy (almost) anniversary of "joining the new forum Helix. smile.gif

Also if you could make a template for your pretty format I would try to use it as a time saving device for uniformity but otherwise I will be lazy and make it readable and leave the "fluffing up" the data to you wink.gif)

I am putting the financial data in because we have been talking about putting our money where our mouths are as a type of informal Stock watch listing for a while and Genron was often mentioned as a company to watch.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=585&ncid=585&e=2&u=/nm/20030820/sc_nm/health_geron_dc

Human Heart Cells Working in Rat Hearts - Geron
Wed Aug 20, 8:28 AM ET Science - Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Geron Corp on Wednesday said it had successfully transplanted heart muscle cells derived from human embryonic stem cells into the hearts of rats and that the human cells appeared to be dividing and forming new heart tissue in the rodents.

The Menlo Park, California-based biotech firm said the human heart cells were transplanted into healthy rats, but that other studies will test whether such transplanted human cells can help animals that have suffered heart attacks.

"These results exemplify one of the basic advantages of using human embryonic stem cell-derived cells for tissue engineering -- namely their ability to re-create the natural developmental biology of new tissue formation," Geron Chief Executive Officer Thomas Okarma said in a statement.

The company said an analysis of the mature grafted tissue indicated the researchers transplanted only human heart cells to the rats, and no other types of human tissue cells. Geron said it had presented data from its study at a meeting of the American Heart Association.

Shares of Geron closed on Tuesday at $7.68 on the Nasdaq. They have traded in the past 52 weeks in a range between $1.41 and $9.75.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 22 2003, 05:04 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-

Happy (real) anniversary to you and happy early birthday! heh.

As for the boarders that give this thread its unique look, i'll keep doing it. Keeps me involved...more. Something like that.

As for the fianancial news I am ok with as long as the companies deal with Stem Cells, like Geron. Im sure you knew that but I have to make sure its down in text.

I have been a coward as far as investing in stocks. I put some in General Electric and I may sell it and put it in Geron, maybe.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: lordprovost Aug 23 2003, 01:58 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Stem Cell Line=-

http://www.reneuron.com/reneuron/releases/pressreleases/

Research culminates in 2005 [!]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 30 2003, 05:21 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE LUNG=-

BURLINGTON, VT – For the first time, researchers have demonstrated that adult human stem cell transplantation results in spontaneous cell regeneration in damaged lung tissue. Published in the August 1 issue of the American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the study further supports an existing body of research that suggests blood- and marrow-derived stem cells have the capacity to become many different human tissues.

"Many of the body's tissues once thought to be only locally regenerative may, in fact, be actively replaced by circulating stem cells after hematopoietic or blood-forming stem cell transplantation," says lead author Benjamin Suratt, M.D., assistant professor of medicine and Vermont Lung Center researcher at the University of Vermont College of Medicine. "This finding is of note not only for its novelty as a regenerative mechanism of the lung, but also for its vast therapeutic implications for any number of lung diseases." (grin)

According to Suratt, the study's findings indicate that circulating stem cells are going into organ tissue and repairing damage, which could have a huge impact on the treatment of such devastating lung diseases as emphysema or cystic fibrosis.

Supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health and a National Center for Research Resources Centers for Biomedical Research Excellence grant, Suratt and his colleagues are currently looking further into what types of cells have the capacity to differentiate and generate a different type of cell, and whether these cells might be used to treat cystic fibrosis

release date: 29-Aug-2003
Contact: Jennifer Nachbur
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-08/uov-scs082903.php
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Aug 30 2003, 05:53 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE HEART=-

Highlights of...

http://www.ohio.com/mld/beaconjournal/news/local/6656787.htm

The first key discovery is that the heart tries to repair itself after a heart attack by releasing a molecule called SDF-1 for a few days after the heart attack -- not enough time to allow for significant healing.

The second finding is that implanting SDF-1 molecules into the heart -- even weeks after a heart attack -- acts as a beacon for the body's naturally occurring stem cells. In effect, the SDF-1 molecules call the stem cells to the heart for repair work.

"We all release about 30,000 stem cells a day,'' Penn said. ``They percolate through our body and then go back to where they want to go to, which is usually the bone marrow. (Implanting SDF-1) essentially gives them another address to go to.''

"So not only are we replacing dead tissue with living cells,'' he said, ``but it's making the body regenerate itself.''

An accompanying review in The Lancet said the ``work is intriguing, but has limitations.'' For starters, the findings come in rats, not humans, though Penn said human trials should begin within two years. Another criticism is that the paper offers no proof that the rats' hearts saw any new muscle growth.

Penn said he and his colleagues wish they could determine whether the stem cells lead to muscle growth. What they do know, though, is that the hearts' function improved.

---------------------------------------------------------
The underlined portion I thought was odd. They could of labeled some stem cells with the green fluorescence protein and then used that to see where the new stem cells went and why the heart function improved.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 1 2003, 06:20 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=PATIENT"S OWN STEM CELLS KEEP THEM FROM NEEDING NEW HEART!=-

Highlights of...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=571&ncid=751&e=4&u=/nm/20030901/hl_nm/health_heart_stemcells_dc

By Ben Hirschler

VIENNA (Reuters) - Four out of a group of five seriously sick Brazilian heart-failure patients no longer needed a heart transplant after being treated with their own stem cells, the doctor in charge of the research said Monday.

"This is the first approach where you have an opportunity to actually heal a heart," said Dr Michael Rosen of Columbia University, New York. "It's going to be a very long road, but it is the most exciting thing I've seen in my 40 years as a doctor in this field."

The four critically ill patients were among a larger group of 14 who Dohmann and colleagues from the Texas Health Science Center in Houston had in April reported showing improved heart function.

The exact mechanism of action is not understood but medics believe stem cells harvested from bone marrow or blood may be able to form new muscle and blood vessels. Alternatively, they may trigger a chemical reaction that improves the functioning of cells in the locality of the injection.

So far, all the clinical work involves so-called "autologous" cell transplants, in which cells are used from the patient's own body.

Rosen and his team are working on a technique to use cell therapy to deliver genes to the heart that would improve its electrical pulse, effectively creating a biological pacemaker to replace today's mechanical ones.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 1 2003, 06:39 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE EYES=-

Highlights of...

http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/7335307p-8279446c.html

"I use the vision to make things easier, but I don't have to rely on it."

May's is considered the most successful -- and most researched -- sight restoration case in history. But for this man who had flourished as a blind person, forging a rich and active life, vision has brought with it some pitfalls. The confidence with which he maneuvered the blind world has in some ways been shaken by the introduction of sight.

Before the surgeries he functioned expertly at nearly everything, including sports such as skiing and windsurfing, by making use of high-tech gadgets and old-fashioned guidance from canes, dogs and people.

Now, while he can see the world, he has trouble interpreting it. The limited vision he has can be both distracting and unnerving.

The scientists studying May after the operations found that while he can make out moving objects such as bouncing balls and passing cars, he can't readily distinguish between male and female faces. Instead, he continues to rely on other sensory clues -- the sound of high heels or the smell of perfume.

May lost his sight at age 3 when a jar of chemicals he was playing with in the back yard of his New Mexico home exploded. In the years following the accident, he had three cornea transplants, all of which failed because of scar tissue.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 3 2003, 05:58 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CONGRESS LOOKING TO CUT CANCER RESEARCH FOR STEM CELLS=-

Highlights of...

http://www.theaxcess.net/health_01_0903.html

Cancer patients and researchers held a rally at Penn State Hershey Medical Center in protest to possible cut backs in cancer research by Congress. The House and Senate want to greatly reduce the amount of money going for federal cancer research funding.

While budgeting runs tight on many fronts on Capital Hill, one area destined for increased expenditures is stem cell research. Bill HR 2852 entitled "Cord Blood Stem Cell Act of 2003" was submitted to the US House of Representatives in July.

The purpose of the Bill is to establish a National Cord Blood Stem Cell Bank Network to prepare, store and distribute human umbilical cord blood stem cells for the treatment of patients and to support peer-reviewed research.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM CELLS HELP: THE EAR=-

Highlights of...

http://washingtontimes.com/upi-breaking/20030902-041340-2919r.htm

Purdue University biologists say they've learned how to control the development of stem cells in the inner ears of embryonic chickens.

By introducing new genes into the cell nuclei, researchers instructed the embryonic cells to develop into different adult cells than they ordinarily would have. Instead of forming the tiny hairs the inner ear uses to detect sound waves, the stem cells matured into tissue with different kind of hairs -- the sort used to keep balance.

Associate biology professor Donna Fekete said: "We now know at least one gene that determines what these embryonic ear cells will eventually become. Because so many people suffer from deafness later in life, we hope this research will yield treatments for them down the line."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 5 2003, 07:50 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=STEM-CELL-TOPIA AND $ SUPPORT FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH=-

Highlights of...

http://afr.com/articles/2003/09/05/1062549023036.html

Workers are putting the finishing touches to an underground vivarium to house a quarter of a million rodents beneath Singapore's new, $US286million ($445million) Biopolis biomedical research and development complex. "We call it the Mickey Mouse park," said Philip Su, assistant chief executive of the JTC, the government industrial park operator that is building Biopolis.

The mice will be surrounded by a sticky mat and what Mr Su described as a sort of moat, to keep them from running off if they escape from their cages. Biopolis' human tenants will eventually be surrounded by a high-technology campus of nearly 500 acres with apartments, schools and wireless internet access.

Faced with declining returns in electronics, the industry that helped catapult Singapore into the ranks of the world's wealthiest nations, the government is throwing its administrative might - and $US2.3billion in investments, grants and other incentives - behind an effort to become an integrated biotechnology hub.

Singapore needs to find a new niche. Cheap labour in China is drawing jobs away. The government has warned that the unemployment rate, now at 4.5 per cent, is likely to climb to 5.5 per cent this year, its highest since 1987.

Singapore began promoting biotechnology in the early 1980s, luring Glaxo in 1982.
In the next decade, Singapore established a Bioprocessing Technology Centre Incubator Unit for start-ups, with fully equipped labs in 1997. In 2000, Singapore declared biotechnology the "fourth pillar" of its economy, renamed its National Science as the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, and spent roughly $US570million to establish three new biotechnology research institutes.

For stem-cell researchers, Singapore offers one of the world's most liberal legal atmospheres. It allows stem cells to be taken from aborted foetuses, and human embryos to be cloned and kept for up to 14 days to produce stem cells.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=RESEARCH TO WATCH AND $ SUPPORT FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH=-

Highlights of...

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?epi-content=GENERIC&newsId=20030905005198&headlineSearchConfigBO=1062154800000%201062794852000%20%20groupByDate%20%201%207%201062154800000%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%20%201000151%20true%20true%20&newsLang=en&beanID=2055223794&viewID=news_view

While genetically more distant from humans, the vertebrate zebrafish nevertheless has comparable organs and tissues, such as heart, kidney, pancreas, bones, and cartilage. The zebrafish is an essential tool to the branch of science called proteomics, which refer to the study of an organism's proteins

Dr. Collodi has received a $1-million, three-year NIH grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). He and his team are exploring ways to introduce specific alternations into zebrafish embryonic stem cells and keep them alive long enough to pass on the genetic traits.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) will break ground in October for a new facility to breed and house zebrafish for intramural research. When completed in 2004, the $10 million 5000-square foot facility will house more than half a million zebrafish in 25,000 tanks.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=RESEARCH TO WATCH AND $ SUPPORT FOR STEM CELL RESEARCH, AGAIN=-

Highlights of...

http://atlanta.bizjournals.com/atlanta/stories/2003/09/01/daily37.html

National Institutes of Health, has awarded a five-year $6.7 million grant to a team headed by scientists at The University of Georgia for research that could eventually help in the treatment of certain kinds of cancer and Parkinson's Disease.

The research funded by the grant will focus on technologies to map the "glycome" of stem cell lines established by Bresagen, a private research company with offices and laboratories in Athens. "Glycome" describes all the complex carbohydrates attached to proteins and lipids that are made by a cell, as well as the enzymes responsible for their metabolism. It also describes the carbohydrate binding proteins that function by recognizing these complex carbohydrates.

The mapping technology will allow the glycomic analysis of small numbers of cells and the means to isolate or kill these particular cells. The expected outcome will be directly applicable to the isolation of certain types of nerve cells for treatment of such diseases as Parkinson's, as well as development of new ways to diagnose and treat cancer.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 9 2003, 03:15 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Pharmaceutical Industry to Address Potential of Stem Cells=-

Highlights of...

[URL=http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030908/nym062_1.html/]Pharmaceutical Industry to Address Potential of Stem Cells /URL]

NEW YORK, Sept. 8 /PRNewswire/ -- Data from recent studies on CNS regeneration using adult stem cells will be presented by the pharmaceutical industry at an upcoming conference, signaling the first step towards the industry's willingness to pursue therapeutics in the hotly debated field.

Over the course of its two highly successful annual events, the conference has attracted stem cell scientists from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, as well as CEO's, CSO's, investors, and others seeking to make contact with the development of the new and promising science.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Sep 9 2003, 04:32 AM

Xref: From http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=117&t=1745&st=0&#entry13508



-=Stem Cells in the Fight Against Crohn's Disease=-



QUOTE
Bryan hopes the stem cell transplant will control the disease and put Bryan into remission.

All 10 patients who have received the transplant no longer suffer from any symptoms related to the disease, said Dr. Richard Burt, a stem cell transplant specialist and chief of the division of immunotherapy at Northwestern.

"We offer the stem cell transplant to those who have very serious disease and have failed everything else,"Burt said."The 10 we have done are all doing great and are in clinical remission."

The stem cell transplant procedure is still considered experimental, but it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical trials two years ago.

Bryan was scheduled to receive the transplant Sept. 15, but his father, a local police officer, has yet to come up with the $100,000 needed for the transplant, living expenses in Chicago and follow-up medical care.

Insurance won't cover the medical costs, because the transplant is considered experimental.

Posted by: Cyto Sep 13 2003, 04:23 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=I Guess You Could Call It A Focus Group For Regeneration=-

Highlights of...

http://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/local/state/hc-13111534.apds.m0677.bc-ct--uconsep13,0,2522488.story?coll=hc-headlines-local-wire

"I'm happy here, but I'm alone. I'm just lonely in my research," Yang, told school officials at the time. "I needed an environment. I needed collaborators."

The university responded by building a $10.6 million Advanced Technology Lab, which will be dedicated Monday. Built with state and federal funds, the state-of-the-art lab also houses the Technology Incubation Program, a wing dedicated to helping private biotech companies with startup operations.

The A-Team (seasoned personnel in the field of regenerative research):

Theodore Rasmussen, a molecular and cellular biologist, was doing biomedical research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology when UConn recruited him. He is currently trying to determine how and why stem cells are able to develop for different functions.

The other researchers include Joanne Conover, a neurobiologist, David Goldhamer, a developmental biologist, X. Cindy Tian, an expert in genetic reprogramming, who is also Yang's wife, and William Fodor, a cellular biologist.

Their collaboration is the basis for the lab's Center for Regenerative Biology, which could ultimately lead to the development of new cells, tissues or organs to be used in the treatment of several disorders such as multiple sclerosis, diabetes and Parkinson's disease.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 15 2003, 04:44 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Democratic presidential candidate Howard Dean: He is at least trying=-

Highlights of...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A10368-2003Sep14.html

After limited success on Capitol Hill, an eclectic new political constituency is hoping to use the 2004 presidential campaign to advance cutting-edge research on human stem cells.

The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research (CAMR)is pressing President Bush and the nine Democrats challenging him to support not only stem cell research but also the more controversial nuclear transfer technology known as therapeutic cloning.

In a letter sent last week, the coalition said it intends to post candidate positions on its Web site and distribute the information to its 80 member groups, which include scientific societies, patient advocacy organizations and the leading biotechnology organization. CAMR hopes its action will put pressure on candidates in early primary states.

"With over 100 million Americans affected by life-threatening diseases and conditions who could benefit from advances in stem cell research, I think this could become a major issue in the campaign," said CAMR President Michael Manganiello. Scientists say embryonic stem cells hold great potential because of their ability to develop into virtually any type of cell. Researchers are pursuing stem cell treatments for illnesses such as Parkinson's disease, juvenile diabetes and Alzheimer's. Embryonic stem cells are extracted from human embryos that would otherwise be discarded.

Nuclear transfer research involves growing stem cells in a laboratory dish. Scientists say these tailor-made cells could enable patients to be treated using their own unique DNA.

Opponents, including some influential religious conservatives, say both types of research amount to the taking of a potential life. Facing that pressure, Bush announced a political compromise two years ago, permitting federal research only on the 60 cell colonies that existed at the time. But so far, only a dozen cell lines have been usable.

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman (D-Conn.) said recently that on the first day of his presidency -- assuming that occurs -- he would rescind Bush's order.

-----------------------------------------------------
This is a semi-political sum up of stem cells for anyone who wants to know - it is a good refresher and gives us a hit as to how the presidential elections may be fought.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Sep 15 2003, 02:41 PM

XREF: http://www.imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=117&t=1585&st=0&#entry13860



-=Sick Kids researchers identify cancer stem cell for brain tumours=-


QUOTE
"The discovery of a cancer stem cell for brain tumours means that only a small number of cells in a brain tumour have the ability to drive tumour growth. Many current cancer therapies may fail because they do not kill the cancer-sustaining stem cells. We now have to work on designing therapies that will attack these stem cells," said Dr. Peter Dirks, an HSC neurosurgeon and scientist-track investigator in the Developmental Biology Research Program, and an assistant professor of Neurosurgery at U of T.

Posted by: Cyto Sep 15 2003, 07:08 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Schering to research ageing in Japan=-

Highlights of...

http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&c=StoryFT&cid=1059479840415

Like Germany, Japan faces a demographic time bomb resulting from shrinking birth rates and rising life expectancy. By mid-century, demographers say, Japan will have more than 1m people aged over 100.

The Japanese government has fully recognised the needs and the challenges of an ageing society," Schering said.


Schering, the German drug maker known best for contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy, is to open a research centre for regenerative medicine in Japan, signalling a new focus on the demands of an ageing society.

Regenerative medicine ranges from the use of stem cells to regenerate entire organs to using genes to initiate regenerative processes. Schering has regenerative products for heart disease and Parkinson's in late-stage clinical research.
----------------------------------------------------------------
We can always move. (chuckle)
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 15 2003, 07:28 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-ESCs=-

Highlights of...

http://www.christianitytoday.com/tcw/2003/005/3.40.html

Scroll down to...
Cloning for Cures?
By Joni Eareckson Tada, founder/ president of Joni and Friends, speaker, disability advocate, and author of the new release, The God I Love (Zondervan).

QUOTE
Lately the news magazines (and Congress) are abuzz about hopeful new cures to be found through cloning stem cells from human embryos. Yet "cloning for cures" is a smack in the face of God's creative authority. It's creating human life for the purpose of lethal experimentation and exploitation. A society that views life as a commodity grows calloused toward anyone weak and frail. Every medical condition researchers are using cloning to address already is being addressed more safely, effectively, and economically using adult stem cells. It's my prayer women will stand courageously on the side of life's sanctity through adult stem-cell research. God gave us life; safeguard it for the sake of your disabled children, husband, and elderly parents.


First, the embryos would of been destroyed. Second, social dawinism will not go into effect if we research using ESCs, complete crap. Third, adults SCs are farther due to represion of ESCs research by the religious ruling of the current political body.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 16 2003, 03:27 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Stem cells grown into sperm cells - Shows furthering of control understanding=-

Highlights of...

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/16/1063625031537.html

The researchers incubated the stem cells with other cells that produce a protein called BMP4, which is known to stimulate formation of sperm cells during the development of an embryo.

In their laboratory, some of the stem cells began developing into sperm cells within one day, a process that takes three days in the embryo.

The work is very preliminary, and was done in the laboratory with mouse stem cells. The next step will be to see if it can be repeated in live animals
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 18 2003, 06:22 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=U.S. Plans New Anti-Cloning Push at U.N.=-

Highlights of...

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=570&ncid=753&e=3&u=/nm/20030917/sc_nm/science_cloning_un_dc

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States plans to push a U.N. resolution expected to call for a ban on all forms of cloning, a stance likely to be opposed by nations favoring more limited restrictions, diplomats said on Wednesday.

A U.S.-led drive last year forced a key U.N. committee to postpone for one year a Franco-German proposal for a treaty that would have banned the cloning of humans but permitted cloning of human embryos for medical research purposes.

The debate pits global opponents of abortion against many in the scientific community who see value in research involving cloning of stem cells taken from human embryos.

U.S. officials told reporters they would support a resolution on cloning put forward by Costa Rica and backed by about 40 other nations. (I bet they do the "no human cloning but thereputic cloning is good to go.")

Other diplomats said the resolution would form a committee to negotiate a convention on cloning and instruct the panel to ensure the treaty forbids all forms of cloning.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 20 2003, 08:57 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ASCs: Skin Cells=-

Highlights of...

http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_383899,00040006.htm

Researchers at the San Francisco VA Medical Center (SFVAMC) have taken the first major step towards isolating adult stem cells from mouse skin, having developed a test that confirms the presence and number of stem cells in a given amount of tissue.

Until now, such a technique has only existed for isolating adult stem cells found in blood. "This assay has opened up a whole new avenue of research," said Ruby Ghadially, SFVAMC staff physician and UCSF associate professor of dermatology.

"If you can determine how many stem cells you have, then you can identify distinguishing characteristics that will allow you to isolate the cells. We could then potentially use these cells as effective carrier cells for gene therapy and, someday, use them to produce new stem cells for treating burns and wounds in the skin," Ghadially added.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-="Nobel Prizes of the medical community"=-



Highlights of...

http://www.voanews.com/article.cfm?objectID=68E0FEBF-FC74-4DC0-BA88EFB5889D9520

The prestigious Lasker Awards for Medical Research and for Public Service this year honor three physicians for their advancements in research and treatment and actor Christopher Reeve for his contributions to medical advocacy. The Lasker Awards are sometimes called the Nobel Prizes of the medical community.


"When the time comes to make decisions about public policy, there is an undue influence from politics and religion, particularly in the case of stem cell research that is to the detriment of patient outcomes," he said.


Dr. Robert Roeder of Rockefeller University was awarded the Basical Medical Research award for pioneering studies about gene transcription, allowing scientists to learn about mapping genes in animal cells.



A team of two immunologists, Australian Dr. Marc Feldmann and Sir Ravinder Maini, who is British, shared the award for Clinical Medical Research for their breakthrough treatment for auto-immune disorders, including rheumatoid arthritis.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=nStem Cells get Fed Money=-

Highlights of...

http://www.svbizink.com/headlines/article.asp?aid=4968&iid=318

The 8-year-old company recently received a $342,000 Small Business Innovation Research grant from the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke to continue animal experiments using its patented human neural stem-cell technology.

StemCells is developing a cell-based therapy made from human neural stem cells, which promises to repair or repopulate neural tissue that has been damaged or lost as the result of disease or injury. For example, a neural stem cell could repair a person's damaged central nervous system.

Earlier this year, StemCells announced that mice inflicted with spinal-cord injuries showed improved motor function after the company transplanted its neural stem-cells into the animals. The company plans to use its federal grant to expand the experiment to a greater number of mice and use more refined transplantation techniques, McGlynn says.

"This is the first time, to our knowledge, that transplanted and engrafted human neural stem cells have been directly correlated with improved function recovery in a mouse spinal-cord injury model," McGlynn says. "Previously É injured rats have been given stem cells from other rats or mice, but not stem cells from a human source."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 23 2003, 11:06 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=nSCs=-

Highlights of...

http://www.bio.com/newsfeatures/newsfeatures_research.jhtml?action=view&contentItem=119385314&Page=1

Using the new technique, the team differentiated stem cells into genetically matched neural cells in vitro. They were able to selectively develop nerve cells specific to the forebrain, midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord, as well as supporting neural cell types called glial cells. The research demonstrates how closely the generated nerve cells in the culture dish mimic normal brain cell development, including how long the process takes, the appearance of the cells, and their function.

"The new technique is a model system that will provide scientists with the opportunity to see how the brain develops in vitro, and conduct experiments such as observing in a culture dish the developmental consequences of disrupting single or multiple genes," said Dr. Studer, senior author of the study.

The next step is to develop unique cell lines for a number of Parkinsonian mice and show that these cloned cells can cure each individual mouse.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Sep 24 2003, 02:50 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CURRENT BANNING WARS=-

I think this decision and article belong here if only by default. For those that do not understand why let me spell it out, THERE IS A PROFOUND ETHICAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN REPRODUCTIVE AND THERAPEUTIC CLONING and this is the difference at the core of the decision to ban Human Reproductive cloning by various serious scientific councils such as the British Society described in the article.

It belongs here because the demand to protect Therapeutic Cloning directly relates to the ability to promote and advance stem cell research from mere esoterica to the level of available therapy that will influence our individual abilities to survive.

I personally might not agree with all the panicked reasons to ban human cloning but regardless I can see them as complex, related but not dependent issues and if "we" as an organization must take a stand, it is only rational to take our stand on cloning as critically imporant for Stem Cells and other aspects of Therapeutic Cloning.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/3128098.stm
Call for ban on human cloning
Monday, 22 September, 2003, 08:07
BBC World News

Scientists from around the world have called for an international ban on the cloning of humans to make babies.

Only a few countries, including the UK, have so far outlawed it.

All attempts to introduce a world-wide ban have been stymied because some countries want that to include the use of all cloning techniques in medical research.
{excerpts}

Related Links
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/ethics/cloning/clones.shtml
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 24 2003, 07:56 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CURRENT BANNING WARS Cont.=-

Highlights of...

http://www.ekklesia.co.uk/content/news_syndication/article_2003_09_24_cloning.shtml

Heh, don't you think they would get it by now Laz?

Archbishop of Cardiff, Peter Smith, Chairman of the Bishops’ Conference Department for Christian Responsibility and Citizenship wrote to the Prime Minister to air his grave concerns.

"In this debate language is slippery. Some things now being called ‘therapeutic cloning’ are perfectly morally acceptable: there is nothing wrong with taking adult stem cells or other cells in the body and cloning them. But what is deeply wrong is the creation of new human lives by cloning, when these lives are then destroyed. This too is being called ‘therapeutic cloning’."

"Furthermore, huge advances have recently been made in adult stem cell research, which is producing prospects of treatment using stem cells without any need to clone young human lives to harvest them."

"The UK government want to support a ban on ‘reproductive’ cloning alone. But the difference consists only in the objective in the procedure – whether the cloned human life is to be implanted in the womb to be born, or simply used for stem cell research and then destroyed."

"What we need is a total ban on cloning human lives.”
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exactly what Laz said, this is failing to understand that these are not humans. The genetics may be there but the development is not.

Biological organisms that undergo a metamorphosis during their lives are not "the same all the time." One can be generally called a tadpole and another a frog. Genetics may be there but the development is not. As for using spare embryos - 1.) there is enough of us right now 2.) the ones used in research are donated 3.) over 300,000 existed in ONE storage area I posted a while back. To not understand there is a difference is a failure to understand this simple logic, which seem to be actually hard. Just like people who don't understand evolution.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 25 2003, 11:38 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=YOU FRIGGEN CELL! WHY DO YOU AGE! TELL ME!=-

Highlights of...

http://www.healthcentral.com/news/NewsFullText.cfm?id=515251

It is a huge step from yeast to humans, Gottschling acknowledges, but the basic principles of cellular reproduction are the same for both. In humans, reproduction happens as stem lines for various tissues keep reproducing. The thought is that older human stem cells start making the same kind of mistakes as seen in yeast.

One interesting aspect of the study is that the genetic damage occurs in daughter cells, not in the older reproducing cells, Sinclair says. "Perhaps old cells accumulate damaged proteins," he says. "Many studies have suggested that damaged proteins are the cause of aging. This study could help validate that theory."

These were special yeast cells, engineered to change color when genetic instability appeared. Several strains of yeast were studied and McMurray's through-the-night observations showed the color changes appeared in every one of them at about the 25th cycle, which is late middle age for a yeast cell.

"Right now we're working like crazy to figure out how this happens, Gottschling says. "What causes the breakdown? Once we understand a little bit about the process and how genes respond, we can think about making the leap to humans."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 26 2003, 08:30 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ENDLESS WALTZ, RIGHT?=-

Highlights of...

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030926/05

German scientists and clinicians are locked in a dispute over whether adult stem cells should be used to treat patients before the safety and effectiveness of the method has been fully proven.

The Problem:
Hescheler said that his team had failed to find evidence in experiments on mice that stem cells drawn from the bone marrow had developed into heart cells, and he noted that there was still no evidence that the adult stem cells injected into Strauer's patients had actually turned into healthy heart muscle cells.

Furthermore, he warned that injecting high concentrations of adult stem cells into arteries close to patients' hearts could lead to the formation of tumors and to disturbances in heart rhythms.

"We need more basic science to know how cells integrate into the host tissue, and especially whether there is an electrical integration. It is still not clear whether adult stem cells cause strong arrhythmias, which could be fatal," Hescheler said in an interview with The Scientist.
End Problem Section

Hescheler is the only one of two scientists in Germany who has been given permission to conduct research on human embryonic stem cells.

Hescheler's experiments in mice have, however, shown that embryonic stem cells can replace cells killed during a heart attack.

Despite the tiff, it seems that scientists and the clinicians will continue working side by side in the field of stem cells.

"It is still an open question whether the stem cell therapy will live up to all expectations. A larger number of patients need to be studied for a longer period of time," she told the paper.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And so we wait. To bad we are not trying to focus more on ESCs and get the "all in one" tool. Im not saying that ESCs are not without their problems too. smile.gif
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 27 2003, 05:32 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=The Cloning Bill gets 12 more supporters, In a good way=-

Highlights of...

http://www.canoe.ca/CalgaryNews/cs.cs-09-27-0034.html

Transforming the votes of 12 New Democrats from nays to yeas could offset the opposition from pro-life Liberals who oppose the bill because it would allow research on embryonic stem cells.

The New Democrats wanted assurances the board would include an equal number of women and men, and it would exclude people with conflicts of interest -- for example, doctors specializing in fertility treatments.

"Fantastic!" Boudria said, when asked to comment on the New Democrats' change in position. "It's 24 votes difference, assuming they're all there.

"It increases the possibility of getting this legislation through immensely."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
smile.gif
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 28 2003, 07:08 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ESCs Need High Quallity Embryos=-

Highlights of...

http://www.sundayherald.com/37036

Healthy couples may agree to create prime-quality embryos specifically for research, once they see the controversial exper iments leading to cures for disease, according to the UK’s leading stem cell scientist.

Professor Austin Smith, director of the Institute for Stem Cell Research at Edinburgh University, says his pioneering research into new treatments for Parkinson’s disease, diabetes and heart disease is being held back by a shortage of quality embryos. At the moment, the research depends on spare embryos left over from fertility treatment, but these are often of poor quality as the best ones have been selected to create babies.

He added: “If and when we get to that stage, there will need to be some discussion about what society wants. Society would need to debate this first. Society might be quite concerned about this, but if we can show that the donation would be clinically useful, people might change their minds.

“A couple might have a relative who suffers from diabetes or Parkinson’s, and could want to donate an embryo for that reason.”

Creating embryos specifically for stem cell research would technically be legal in the UK at the moment, but it might be difficult to get a licence from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the government agency which regulates experiments on embryos.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What? And we thought life extension was going to be easy. *chuckle* Continue dancing please, the waltz has yet to end. smile.gif
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 28 2003, 06:46 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CORD-BLOOD IS EASY SOURCE TO TAP=-

Highlights of...

http://www.floridatoday.com/!NEWSROOM/moneystoryA14248A.htm

"The good thing about cord blood is, when you ask for it, it's readily available in the bank," said Dr. Jan Moreb, a transplant physician who is the director of the stem-cell laboratory at Shands Hospital at the University of Florida.

The process takes about 10 minutes to extract, on average, about 3.5 ounces of cord blood, according to Dr. Joanne Kurtzberg, director of the pediatric bone-marrow transplant program at Duke University in Durham, N.C. "No technique works as well as gravity to get the baby's blood out," she said.

Once the donated cord blood meets certain standards as to size, maternal health and genetic testing, she said, it can be frozen and stored in a liquid-nitrogen freezer for up to 10 years. Whether cord blood remains viable or usable after a decade is not yet known, though. (Quallity probably suffers.)
------------------------------------------------------------
Overall, its easy to get CORD but that sure doesn't make grounds to ban ESCs therapy research. That just means that its good to have other stem cell supplies which can further genetic understanding of 'what buttons to push.' And ESCs, as we all should know, are the card of all trades.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Sep 29 2003, 07:54 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WiCell Gets $1.7 Million Grant For ESCs=-

Highlights of...

http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/michigan/index.ssf?/newsflash/get_story.ssf?/cgi-free/getstory_ssf.cgi?g9443_BC_MI--StemCellGrant&&news&newsflash-michigan

The NIH's National Institute of General Medical Sciences is awarding three grants, announced last week, totaling $6.3 million to three leaders in the stem cell field. The other two grants will go to the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center at the University of Washington-Seattle and the University of Michigan Medical School in Ann Arbor, Mich.

Andrew Cohn, a WARF spokesman, said the grant will help researchers learn more about the basic science of stem cells.

Human embryonic stem cells are valued by researchers because they are primitive blank-slate cells that have not yet begun to grow into specific kinds of cells, such as brain or pancreatic or heart cells.

The hope is that scientists will be able to guide the growth of stem cells so they can then be used to replace diseased cells in the body.

http://www.wicell.org/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ah what we need to hear. [B)]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________


I had posted about this earlier and they still seem to be working on it, making stem cells from rabbit embryos fused with hSkin cells. I don't know, the leading research may like it but it being rabbit doesn't assure me too much. If we were to try anything medical with it, I mean.

http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=60 (Link function isn't giving specific links at the moment.)
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Oct 4 2003, 10:09 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=CURRENT UN BANNING WARS=-
It is interesting how this debate is shaping up. It parallels the debate between Stock and Annas that we witnessed at th beginning of the WTA Conference at Yale. This administration is behaving very poorly with respect to many scientific concerns this not being the only one that are not such big news catchers.

We need to also go on record in as many ways as possible in favor of therapeutic and at least abstain on reproductive cloning. If the organization wants to go on record as BJ has done against it I will accept that ruling but most importantly of all we must drive a wedge into the debate that supports the establishment of two distinct aspects of human cloning and not allow the opposition to bundle them together.

LL/kxs

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mymod/hdln/rsc/sty/*http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=585&e=3&u=/nm/20031003/sc_nm/science_cloning_un_dc
UN Anti-Cloning Treaty Seen Heading for Collapse
Fri Oct 3, 6:44 PM ET Science - Reuters
By Irwin Arieff

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - A U.N. drive for a global ban on human cloning appeared headed for collapse on Friday after drafters deadlocked over whether to push for the total ban backed by the United States or a partial ban exempting scientific research on stem cells.

The deadlock surfaced during a weeklong meeting of a U.N. General Assembly working group convened to lay the groundwork for the treaty to be drafted. During the week, governments divided into two blocs and acknowledged their differences probably could not be resolved, diplomats told Reuters. A final decision on the next steps will be up to the General Assembly's legal committee, which has set no date for a ruling on the matter.

A group of some 40 nations, led by Costa Rica and the United States and assembled with the help of U.S.-based anti-abortion groups, insisted on a treaty banning both the cloning of humans and "therapeutic" or "experimental" cloning, in which human embryos are cloned for medical research aims.

A rival group of 14 governments, most of them European but also including Japan, Brazil and South Africa, argued the top priority should be to quickly ban the cloning of humans, leaving it up to individual governments to decide whether -- and if so, how -- to regulate therapeutic cloning.

"Therapeutic cloning is one of the technologies that we believe has enormous promise," said Elizabeth Woodson of Britain's Department of Health. "We are looking to a future where cellular research will lead to new treatments for a range of serious diseases which affect many millions of people and which are currently without a cure."

But Ann Corkery, representing the United States, argued a treaty allowing experimental cloning "would essentially authorize the creation of a human embryo for the purpose of killing it to extract stem cells, thus elevating the value of research and experimentation above that of a human life."

The General Assembly first voted to draft a treaty against human cloning two years ago, at the urging of France and Germany. Those two countries had now backed away from the campaign in light of the divisions, diplomats said.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 5 2003, 05:42 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Working on ESC Availability=-

Highlights of...

http://www.trivalleyherald.com/Stories/0,1413,86~10669~1678238,00.html

Patient advocacy groups applauded the signing of two bills that will make California the first state to set up ethical guidelines for embryonic stem cell research -- and develop a registry for scientists to gain access to stem cells.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Politics and Science, we need talking=-

Highlights of...

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2003/10/05/the_science_gap/

The case for OTA's reincarnation is fairly straightforward. When Congress debates the Bush administration's rejection of the Kyoto treaty to combat global warming or its explanation of the great blackout of 2003, partisan voices on all sides appeal to the authority of science. But what does the best science tell us? Members of Congress rarely have the ability or the time to inform themselves about technical issues. After the House of Representatives voted 265-162 to ban all cloning of human cells in 2001, Representative Peter Deutsch, a Florida Democrat, commented, "This is the least informed collectively that the 435 members of this body have ever been on any issue."
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 6 2003, 01:24 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=COMMENTARY=-

LETS BE BLUNT: A Pseudo-Article
By Ryan Bates

Today I was looking around the web for acquiring direct news from Japan about their research on Embryonic Stem Cells but I ran across the http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=20#entry9081 website.

Let me back up a little. Why would I want to, in the first place, look around for ESC news from Japan? Well, if you have been paying attention for the course of stem cell news you would know they are THE place to be if you want to work on them. Not only are they seriously well funded but they have the entire Government backing. They are even defending ESC research at the UN Conference while the USA is on the side of extreme pro-life, at this very moment. In short they should be saying "You Stupid Americans."

Now I present a staple of the modern pro-life side. (to ImmInst, at least, it should be known as: "Thank you Captain Obvious") The staple is, from DO NO HARM: "Adult Stem Cells are better then Embryonic Stem Cells. Why? Because they have more research out on them. They have success stories." (This excludes the religious side) First ESCs, if pro-lifers can recall, were dealt a huge blow by President Bush(http://imminst.org/forum/index.phps=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=0#entry2296 resulting in defective lines, lines that didn't even culture, lines littered with murine feeder cells and lines stuck in countries which wouldn't export the stem cells (India me thinks). Second, ASCs get the federal grants and they can use whatever they want where the waiting list for ESCs in the US can be months long with huge fees. The National Inst. of Health (federal inst) has recently given $1.7 million for ESC (http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=100#entry14371(I think they are fed up). Now why can it possibly be that ASCs are looked into more then ESCs? wink.gif

Moving on... Why are people interested in Embryonic Stem Cells? A good complaint that I have heard many times is "You have to get multiple treatments of Adult Stem Cells from different lines and companies (depends on problem at the time)" Why is this a bad thing?

*We need a stem cell that can detect somatic abnormalities/damage and diversify without having to be pre-diversified. (Aka: Time, convenience, plasticity problems)

*If centers that perform Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer were integrated (or state localized) into/by hospitals it would be immediately beneficial to patents with degeneration, loss of blood etc. They would be able to culture it close - increasing doctor-patient relationship, procreations of cells on time, dramaticaly less chance of something going wrong with SC collection. (Aka: Subjective assurance, time issues, convenience, direct access, building trust foundations)

*What about costs? With ASCs you would need multiple treatments and wait for more cultures to proliferate. They also need to make sure of what they have first then seperate it out. Your Insurance Company would love ESCs a lot better.

Bottom line. We as Humans want to have the best way to deal with the many problems of aging, injuries etc. So it would be logical to want the "all in one cell." Leading to lower costs (all the same cell), quicker treatment times and sparking the integration or localization of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Centers in each state.
________________________________________________________________________________
_______

QUOTE
Sources of cells are excess embryos from fertility clinics. The American Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reported Thursday that there are 396,526 frozen embryos in storage in the United States and that 88 percent are planned for use in helping families have children in the future. http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=40#entry9489


QUOTE
At the moment, the research depends on spare embryos left over from fertility treatment, but these are often of poor quality as the best ones have been selected to create babies.
http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=100#entry14306


QUOTE
We have derived four ES cell lines on mouse embryonic fibroblast cells in medium supplemented with basic fibroblast growth factor, human recombinant leukemia inhibitory factor, and fetal bovine serum. The source of these cell lines was poor-quality embryos that in the course of routine clinical practice would have been discarded. After continuous proliferation in vitro for more than 12 months, these ES cell lines maintained their developmental potential to form trophoblast and somatic cells, including cardiac muscle and neuronal tissue. http://stemcells.alphamedpress.org/cgi/content/short/21/5/521


We have the Embryos, otherwise they are going to waste since they are 'not the best for making babies.' People can say that we need donations which is fine but we have a long-term report saying different.

If women were allowed to sell their embryos to medical clinics like men do with sperm we could generate the supply line for people actually being able to have a company culture ESCs for customers. (Im sure some of us would like to retain our mito's DNA though.) Leading to a thriving economy of Life Extentionists. As for how the politics and society would change I do not know. It will be an interesting future though.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 6 2003, 07:43 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=WHAT THE HELL IS HAPPENING! Personal Commentary=-

Excuse my excessive words but let me finish.

http://www.planetark.org/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/22463/story.htm


)))))))I know we have posted about this recently but this article makes it sound really friggen bad.
_______________________________________________________________________

QUOTE
A group of some 40 nations, led by Costa Rica and the United States and assembled with the help of U.S.-based anti-abortion groups, insisted on a treaty banning both the cloning of humans and "therapeutic" or "experimental" cloning, in which human embryos are cloned for medical research aims.


So... what the bleep is going on here? Who the crap let them "help?" Where are the REAL scientists in this? Is the US, JUST the anti-abortion groups? Are they crowing the observer seats? Is something that shouldn't be going on - going on? [angry]

QUOTE
But Ann Corkery, representing the United States, argued a treaty allowing experimental cloning "would essentially authorize the creation of a human embryo for the purpose of killing it to extract stem cells, thus elevating the value of research and experimentation above that of a human life."


DO WE HAVE ANY SCIENTISTS TO SLAP THESE PEOPLE AWAY FROM THE LECTERN? What degree do you need to be a damn politician! [angry]

ANYONE HAVE SOMETHING TO SAY ABOUT THIS?!?!?!?!?
This is entirely absurd! To the highest degree! And you know if ESCs go down kiss any LE bye! Unless you move to Singapore...Im sure there is other countries too. [angry]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 8 2003, 03:36 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Reliance=-

Highlights of...

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/cms.dll/html/uncomp/articleshow?msid=221780

BANGALORE: While factories mass-producing human cells and tissues to replace damaged ones are still in the realm of science fiction, an Indian research unit, Reliance Life Sciences, is among the few that has produced human tissue and cells in the laboratory.

Using cells derived from embryonic stem cells, which have the potential to become any human organ or tissue, Reliance Life Sciences has created nerve tissue that could reverse brain damage due to Parkinson's disease, as well as beta islet cells that can regulate diabetes, heart tissue to repair weak hearts and also blood cells.

The technology is now ready for animal trials, says Dr Satish Totey, research head at the laboratory that was in a list of 11 whose stem cell lines were cleared for federally funded projects by US President George Bush in 2001.

`Permanent cell lines developed for the pharma industry can cut 15 to 20 years and billions of dollars in the drug development process. Clinical data on the effectiveness of drugs can be obtained quickly by conducting experiments on these cell lines,' says Dr Totey.

Though India has no policy on this front, Reliance is preparing to develop new cell lines that have not been fed on mouse embryonic cells, says Dr Totey.
--------------------------------------------
We will see how it goes won't we?

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=The science gap: Responses=-

Highlights of...

http://www.boston.com/globe/sunday/message_boards/100503/msg1.shtml

The science gap

In "The Science Gap," Chris Mooney finds that scientists and the Bush administration increasingly disagree on issues such as climate change, stem cells, and missile defense. Has the Bush administration unwisely ignored scientists' professional expertise? Has it wisely stuck to its own principles?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In your lead you mentioned Congress has gotten rid of its science advisors. Given my low opinion of our representatives in Congress & their preoccupation with partisan politics, I don't think they would either be able to recognize real science if they stumbled into it nor would they be interested unless they could attack President Bush with any wild claims a so-called "scientist" would make.

R, Stoughton
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This administration has been ignoring not only scientists, but any opinion that disagrees with their own. One only need examine Bush's terribly flawed and damaging environmental policies to see he and his big business pals have no use for actual facts. Global warming? Just a theory. Arsenic in your drinking water? No biggie. Outdated mid western power plants polluting the north east? Let's cut them some slack. It will continue to be this way until the American public takes back the White House next year. Business profits should never outweigh destroying the planet.

Dave, Norfolk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bush has clearly been ignoring scientific facts regarding the environment but let's not forget the UN weapons inspectors who for months were saying they couldn't locate any evidence whatsoever of WMD. Of course that wasn't good enough for war monger Bush, who claimed the inspectors didn't know what they were doing. Well, gee, now look. Who's "facts" turned out to be true - the scientists or the liars in the White House?

Lou, Hingham
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Classic example - Bush's missle defense shield fantasy. Scientists say no way can it work given current technology, can't tell a decoy from the real thing. But our genius president says yup, we're still going to throw billions at this loser, make the boys at the Pentagon happy.

Bill, Swampscott
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a scientist in the Boston area and believe that the Bush Administration has not placed enough emphasis on research and science in general. This is proven in the lack of sufficient available funds in the form of grants provided by the NIH. If we desire to gain understanding in the fields of healthcare and disease prevention then an administration must step up and provide the funds to knowledgeable researchers whos work could further the discoveries of how diseases function and help to prevent and treat them.

Kevin L, Boston
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm, lets see, a department created and backed by Ted Kennedy somehow being seen as wasteful and slow. Must be a mistake. At least Bush sr.and Gringrich had enough sense to get rid of another democratic dumping ground for Kennedy's cronies. This is just another way for the liberal globe to take cheapshots at the republicans.

TONY, BOSTON
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bush's stance on purported global warming (and especially the economically suicidal Kyoto protocol) is exactly right, given the real state of climate science. Ironically, many of Bush's environmental policies, particularly re arsenic, are a continuation of regulations drawn up by Clinton's administration. But as comments from Dave from Norfolk and Lou from Hingham show, this is not commonly known. R. from Soughton has it right, but s/he should have also mentioned the media (specifically including the Globe) which due to a combination of scientific ignorance, laziness of research, and left-leaning partisan reporting will not or cannot give us a reasonable view of the state of science and science policy.

Paul, Plymouth

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Group Asks World Court to Rule Out Human Cloning=-

Highlights of...

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=3578649&section=news

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - A group of scientists, doctors and legal experts asked the United Nations Wednesday to seek an advisory opinion from the World Court declaring human cloning to be a "crime against humanity."

"The World Court is the ultimate authority on international law, and an opinion from the court would bring a very strong legal and moral force to bear against the would-be cloners," said attorney Bernard Siegel of Coral Gables, Florida, who organized the initiative.
----------------------------------------
Could they be smart enough to Ok the use of ESCs? We will see.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 9 2003, 11:56 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Great Article of a Great Researcher=-

Highlights of...

http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2020021



IRVING WEISSMAN discovered his passion for science when he read Paul de Kruif's “Microbe Hunters”, which detailed the adventures of Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch and other early bacteriologists. Only ten years old at the time, he did not know then that he would himself become one of biology's pioneers. Today, Dr Weissman is widely known for being the first person to track down adult stem cells of any type.

In 1988, the Stanford professor of pathology and cancer biology reported having isolated blood-forming stem cells from mice. Four years later, he accomplished the same feat for humans. Recently, he has been part of a group that discovered human stem cells capable of generating various types of brain cells. His research has helped lay the foundations for a revolution in medicine.

To speed up that process, Dr Weissman has founded no less than three companies. Two are based in Palo Alto, California, minutes from his office. StemCells, started in 1995, hopes to begin human trials for its neural stem cells late next year. Possible beneficiaries include people suffering from Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative diseases of the brain, and also victims of strokes. Brand new, but more clinically advanced, Cellerant Therapeutics focuses on developing purification techniques for human blood-forming stem cells.

Thus far, Dr Weissman, who is now 63 years old, has worked only with adult stem cells. But he is the first to admit that, unlike the embryonic stem cells, their ability to divide and differentiate into other cells may be confined to specific tissue types. Though, as chairman of a National Academies' panel, he testified before the American senate against human reproductive cloning, he spoke in favour of nuclear transplantation (sometimes called “therapeutic cloning”), a technique that allows the creation of new embryonic stem-cell lines. “We can prohibit the research and thereby forfeit America's position at the forefront of science, or we can push ahead and potentially cure many fatal diseases.” Dr Weissman intends to do the latter—a view he emphasises publicly at every opportunity.

Irving Weissman was born into a family of pioneers. His grandfather arrived as an immigrant at Ellis Island around 1910, and made his way across America until he reached Montana, where he settled with his family. While Montana may not seem like the ideal place to get the education an aspiring scientist needs, for Irving Weissman it turned out to be precisely right. As a schoolboy, he looked for a chance to get some hands-on research experience. Lucky for him, the local pathologist at the Montana Deaconess Hospital, Ernst Eichwald, was also a specialist in transplantation biology. For the next few summers, young Weissman took care of the laboratory mice and was allowed to participate in the research. By the time he was 18, he had been co-author of two papers—a feat that helped him get into Stanford medical school.

A few months after his arrival in California, he found his way into Henry Kaplan's laboratory. The late Dr Kaplan, who pioneered the use of targeted high dose radiotherapy for Hodgkin's lymphoma and helped turn the then-fatal disease into one that is reasonably easy to cure, became Irving Weissman's mentor. He gave him lab space and let him investigate the properties of lymphocytes—a subset of disease-fighting white blood cells that play a key part in the immune system.

In the early 1960s, he met Sir James Gowans, who was developing sophisticated methods of understanding how lymphocytes function. By purifying the cells and putting them into a host, Sir James demonstrated how they circulate throughout the body; recognise and remember foreign antigens; and create an immune response. Studying with Sir James at Oxford for nine months convinced him of the importance of performing diligent experiments in vivo.

Finding the stem cell was like looking for a needle in a haystack, Dr Weissman recalls. When monoclonal antibodies were invented by Georges Kohler and César Milstein in the mid-1970s, he used them as a tool to bind to and identify various types of blood cell. Initially, the goals were to look for common ancestors of different lymphocytes; to understand their development at various stages; and to study where they go haywire and cause diseases such as leukaemias and lymphomas. Slowly working its way backwards, Dr Weissman's team eventually found precursors to t-cells, b-cells and the like.

They continued to isolate one cell type after another. By 1986, it became clear that the team was on to something big. In 1987, Dr Weissman and his colleagues performed a final test by injecting the last batch of cells, believed to be stem cells, into mice whose immune systems had been completely destroyed by radiation. The results were amazing. Before, bone-marrow transplants generally required at least 200,000 cells. Now, with only a tiny fraction of the original number—100 cells or so—the mice's marrow could be completely replenished.

While Dr Weissman has yet to achieve the ultimate goal of haematology—cultivating human blood-forming stem cells in vitro, he is on his way to commercialising purified versions for patients with cancer, auto-immune diseases and those needing transplants. Eventually, it should be possible, he believes, to replace a body's diseased bone marrow with tissue from a healthy donor without adverse immune reactions—making it possible to take organs and/or stem cells from that same donor and transplant them successfully. Because both will share the same immune system, tissue rejection should not be an issue.

Purified cells also offer hope for patients with late-stage cancers, who sometimes receive intense radiation and chemotherapy regimens as a last resort. A dose high enough to kill all tumour cells generally also kills all blood-forming stem cells, and thus the patient. To avoid this, physicians remove bone marrow prior to treatment, and transplant it back afterward. Unfortunately, in many cases the marrow itself contains cancer cells and can make the patient sick again. According to Dr Weissman, the remedy is to transfer highly purified stem cells.

Dr Weissman tested the concept at SyStemix, a company he had founded in 1988. The company began three small clinical trials in 1996—the most promising being for women with breast cancer in a late stage of development. Five years after receiving the purified cells, more than one-third of the participants are still alive—without a trace of the disease. The best survival rate other therapies have achieved is about 10%. Robert Negrin, head of Stanford's bone-marrow transplant programme, who led the trial, cautions that a large-scale randomised trial still needs to be performed in order to confirm the statistical significance of the results. But, he admits, “the patients are doing surprisingly well.”

The results are even more remarkable in light of the fact that, for metastatic breast cancer patients, bone-marrow transplants have been discredited. According to an influential paper published in April 2000 in the New England Journal of Medicine, they provide no survival benefit whatsoever. After the article appeared, the use of this treatment more or less stopped. Dr Weissman suggests that the blood cells in question may have contained stem cells mixed with other cells, including cancerous ones, and not purified enough to benefit the patients.

When Sandoz bought SyStemix in 1996, he hoped the pharmaceutical giant would speed up the commercialisation. But a couple of years after Sandoz's own merger with Ciba in 1996, the company (now called Novartis) changed its priorities and put SyStemix's cell sorting and purifying technologies on the back burner. Three years after SyStemix shut up shop, Dr Weissman convinced Novartis to license key technologies to his new company, Cellerant. He reckons it will take another three years to complete the late-stage trials necessary to bring purified cells to market.


From adult to embryo
Until now, Dr Weissman's work has been all about adult stem cells—though that may soon change. At Stanford's new Cancer and Stem-Cell Biology Institute, he plans to encourage the creation of new embryonic stem-cell lines. This is the controversial procedure that involves transferring the nucleus of an adult cell into an egg to create a “blastocyst”—essentially a very early stage embryo made up of a ball of 200 cells or so.

For the purposes of cloning a human, a blastocyst would have to be implanted into a womb and carried to term—a medically dangerous procedure that fails 99.2% of the time in animals and should be outlawed, Dr Weissman insists. What should be allowed, he says, is the creation of a blastocyst to harvest embryonic stem cells—those rare “pluripotent” cells that appear soon after conception. Creating new lines is essential, Dr Weissman argues, because the few available for government-funded research in America do not have the genetic diversity needed for the study of many diseases.

According to the human cloning prohibition bill, which was passed by America's House of Representatives in February 2003 and now before the Senate, anyone practising nuclear transfer for the purpose of cloning a human being or harvesting human stem cells will be punished with up to ten years in prison and fined a minimum of $1m. While Dr Weissman acknowledges the ethical and religious issues involved, he argues against such drastic measures. Ultimately, he says, the question is: Who do we care about more—a speck of cells or a grown human being suffering from a life-threatening or debilitating illness?

For his outspoken work, he gets the admiration of many other pioneers in the scientific community—including a Nobel laureate, Paul Berg, who praises Dr Weissman for leading the discussion. In fact, Dr Weissman likens the current debate on embryonic stem cells to the one Dr Berg helped spark on recombinant DNA more than 20 years ago. Back then, scientists themselves put a moratorium on the research until guidelines were established that oversee experiments without prohibiting them. As a result, the world now has many new medicines to help cure hundreds of thousands of people, Dr Weissman points out. Similarly, he believes that stem cells “will open the doors like recombinant DNA did for the biotechnology revolution.”
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 10 2003, 07:45 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=People trying to Inform=-

Highlights of...

http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:21025

Rapid scientific and technological progress can give rise to serious ethical dilemmas of concern to European citizens. A key question, therefore, is how to ensure that citizens are kept informed and involved in the resulting ethical debates.

One organisation that is rising to the challenge of bringing such debates into the public sphere is the Brussels based European Institute of Bioethics. Their strategy includes holding public meetings, attracting members of the public who do not necessarily have a scientific background, but who wish to improve their understanding of how bioethical issues affect their daily lives.

On 9 October, the institute held one such meeting to provide an overview of bioethics, an explanation of technical terms such as stem cells and supernumerary embryos, and an analysis of press coverage and Belgian law in relation to bioethics. CORDIS News spoke to some of those attending the meeting and asked why they felt it was important to remain informed about ethical matters relating to genetic engineering and biotechnology.

'I am very wary of the direction these technologies are taking, particularly cloning for therapeutic purposes and research using human in vitro embryos,' said Ms Martin. 'But I would like to better understand the research area before passing judgement.'

'I already know a bit about bioethics from my philosophy classes, but I came here today because I know that if I don't continue to keep up with what's going on, I will get left behind in the debate.'

'Scientific issues are often quite complex and scientists find it is easier to debate among themselves than simplify the information for the public,' said Ms Jeanty. 'Perhaps those in the scientific community are not prepared to do this.' (How about you talk with the pro-life people and ask them why they like to contort things first before you pick on the scientists.)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall only 40 people showed up. - Bates

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Eh, Its a Start...I Guess=-

Highlights of...

http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2003/s964515.htm

From Melbourne, Ben Knight reports.

BEN KNIGHT: Late last year, after days and nights of debate, and a rare conscience vote, the Australian Parliament passed laws giving Australian scientists access to frozen surplus human embryos and their valuable stem cells.

While it did make some restrictions, like banning therapeutic cloning, and the use of new human embryos, it essentially gave Australian researchers a secure supply of embryonic stem cells, for at least two years.

But in Europe, it's been a far different story. Germany, Italy, Ireland and Austria are leading the charge for an outright ban on embryonic stem cells. And European scientists are feeling the effects.

Professor Christine Mummery, from the Hubrecht Laboratory in Holland, made history last year, when she and her team created a beating heart from stem cells. She's currently in Melbourne with some of the world's top stem cell researchers and she says it's becoming more and more difficult to do it in the EU.

CHRISTINE MUMMERY: Europe is very fragmented on this and many of us believe that it is a move by certain countries to actually block stem cell research in general. It's a very tricky way of getting in the backdoor and actually blocking our research.

BEN KNIGHT: The other powerhouse of medical research, the United States, also has tight restrictions on the use of these cells, banning the creation of any new lines for use by scientists and restricting federal money – all of which means that Australia is poised to pick up new researchers, and research, that might otherwise have been done overseas.

CHRISTINE MUMMERY: That's quite possible, yes, because Europeans are very Australian minded. There are a lot of Europeans here, so people actually feel very comfortable about working in Australia. So there's a good chance that very motivated people might come here now that the legislation's very favourable here to come and do their research.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 11 2003, 08:10 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Adult Stem Cells Heal Tissue Damage=-

Highlights of...

http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2003-10-10-4

I'm sure you all have already read the study conducted by Russia's Scientific Research Institute of Transplantology and Artificial Organs (I don't think they have a site). The ASCs taken from the marrow were used to treat burns which worked a lot faster than the ESCs. Of course you have to recover from both the burn and the marrow extraction. (By all means, lets stop ESC research and just go with that. (roll eyes))

This research reinforces the fact that we need to understand the membrane signaling during cell crosstalk and try to increase this response in vivo.

A good representation of what I'm trying to convey here is with Global Warming. It may be true that we will survive the greenhouse effect with the burning of fossil fuels but, is that really a reason to stop worrying about trying to find a better source to derive energy from? Of course not, there are better sources that we can see in nature. This is the same thing - we have an example of a cell that can change into anything and to discard it because the "gasoline" works is not what smart humans do.

--Bates

http://www.nj.com/news/times/index.ssf?/base/news-0/1065861318128685.xml
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 13 2003, 09:06 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ASCs Can do it, ASCs can't do it=-

Highlights of...

http://www.upi.com/view.cfm?StoryID=20031012-121339-2906r

http://www.startribune.com/stories/484/4150343.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17436-2003Oct12.html

WASHINGTON, Oct. 12 (UPI) -- A study in mice indicates that contrary to previous thinking, a type of adult stem cell derived from bone does not give rise to new heart and brain cells when transplanted into the body.

The finding that this type of stem cell might not be as medically beneficial as researchers had hoped likely will have a significant impact on the political debate over embryonic and adult stem cells.

Previous studies, however, have hinted adult stem cells do not actually give rise to new cells when transplanted into the body but merely fuse with existing cells. Based on this, many stem cell scientists had come to accept the idea the cells did not offer the same regenerative capacity as embryonic stem cells.

The new study confirms the previous observations of fusion and "draws into question" the idea the adult stem cells could be used in humans to repair damaged heart and brain cells, principal investigator Arturo Alvarez-Buylla and his co-authors concluded in their paper, which the journal Nature published online Sunday.

The study "casts great doubt on the idea that adult stem cells could be the equivalent of embryonic stem cells," Dr. David Scadden, director of the center for regenerative medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital, told United Press International. "That concept is generally, by and large, no longer accepted."

read more at the links above...
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 14 2003, 01:01 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Could push research closer to therapeutic applications and replacement organs=-

Highlights of...

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-10/miot-mer101003.php

Excellent

The team "seeded" human embryonic stem cells, which have the potential to differentiate into a variety of specialized cells, onto a biodegradable polymer scaffold. By treating the scaffold/stem cell structure with chemical cues, or growth factors, known to stimulate the formation of specific cell types, the researchers coaxed the stem cells to form tissues with characteristics of developing human cartilage, liver, nerves and blood vessels.

"Here we show for the first time that polymer scaffolds … promoted proliferation, differentiation and organization of human embryonic stem cells into 3D structures," the researchers wrote in a paper to appear the week of Oct. 13 in the online edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Further, the resulting tissues continued to thrive when implanted in mice with suppressed immune systems (to eliminate rejection). They expressed human proteins, and integrated with the host's blood-vessel networks.

"For me it was very exciting to see that these [stem] cells could move around and start to 'talk' with one another, generating the different cell types common to a given tissue and organizing into that tissue," said Shulamit Levenberg, first author of the paper and a research associate in the Department of Chemical Engineering.

The technique could also have an impact on the study of cell and developmental biology. "When you give cells a three-dimensional structure [on which to grow], it's really a lot more like what's happening in the embryo," said Levenberg, a mother of four whose youngest child is seven months old.

Levenberg's colleagues on the work are Robert Langer, the Germeshausen Professor of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering; MIT alumna Ngan Huang (S.B. 2002); Erin Lavik, a postdoctoral fellow in the MIT-Harvard Division of Health Sciences and Technology who is now a professor at Yale; Arlin Rogers of MIT's Division of Comparative Medicine; and Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor of the Technion in Israel.

The work provides a new approach to prodding stem cells to grow into different tissues. Before, researchers created a variety of cell types from one batch of stem cells, then isolated the cell type of interest. The isolated cells were then grown on a given medium, such as a polymer scaffold. The same MIT team did just that last year with the endothelial cells that blood vessels are composed of.

This time around, the MIT researchers seeded stem cells directly into the scaffold. "We found that with different growth factors, we could push them in different directions," said Levenberg.

The polymer scaffold is key. "The scaffold provides physical cues for cell orientation and spreading, and pores provide space for remodeling of tissue structures," the researchers wrote.

The scaffold was carefully engineered. "If the scaffold is too soft," for example, "it collapses under the cells' mechanical forces," said Levenberg. The team also used two different polymers to create the scaffold. "One degrades quickly, the other more slowly," she said. "That gives cells room to grow while still retaining a support structure for them."

The work was supported by the National Institutes of Health. The human embryonic stem cells are from an NIH-approved line.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 15 2003, 12:16 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Ethics=-

Highlights of...

http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:21037

Halfway into the article...
With no international guidelines yet available for the ethical administration of research on stem cells and in vitro embryos, Professor Trontelj expects the problem to get worse before it gets better, and said that an important step forward would be an additional protocol to the Convention on human rights covering research ethics.

For Professor Jan Helge Solbakk, Director of the centre for medical ethics at the University of Oslo, establishing a debate at international level is the key to reaching practical agreements(Yet, its happening at the UN). He warned of the dangers involved in overselling therapeutic potential in order to promote a particular field of research, and said that regions like Europe had an obligation to scale up their spending on research into diseases affecting the developing world.

Ms Rhode agreed that the EU itself has not been as engaged in the developing world dimension of ethical research as it should because it had been more focussed on issues related to internal diversity. That experience and diversity, however, meant that the EU has an important role to play in the global process, added Ms Rhode.

In drawing conclusions from the seminar, Mr Christian Hambro, Director General of the research council of Norway, said that some of the ethical issues raised in medical research were too important to be taken by individual scientists, or even by the scientific community as a whole. Professor Trontelj echoed this belief, and demanded that the public be consulted, and reminded of their duty to learn about the issues from credible sources. 'We must separate ethics from politics, and scientists should not be allowed to fuel the unrealistic expectations of science that politicians sometimes demand.'

Ms Rhodes concluded by agreeing that more EU cooperation is needed with the candidate countries and the developing world. Finally she stressed that, despite the complexity of the issues: 'ethics should not be seen as a barrier or bureaucratic hurdle to progress, but as an enabler of science.'

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Mmmm, any fusion? Is it only fusion?=-

Highlights of...

http://www.heartcenteronline.com/myheartdr/home/research-detail.cfm?reutersid=3878

http://drkoop.com/template.asp?page=newsdetail&ap=93&id=8007195


QUOTE
Oct 14 (Reuters Health) - After a heart attack, infusing stem cells into the coronary arteries that supply blood to the heart muscle leads to a reduction in the area of heart damage. Moreover, heart function improves after the treatment, German physicians report.

Stem cells are early-stage cells that can go on to become several different types of tissue. Dr. Stefanie Dimmeler and associates at J. W. Goethe-University Frankfurt isolated stem cells from the bone marrow or blood of 28 heart attack patients and about four days later infused the cells into the coronary artery that caused the heart attack.


I would like to know if these cells were fused with others but they don't seem to want to check for that. Even though that has been shown to be the case in some studies. We have had this problem before. http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=20#entry8506

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Cutting-Edge Cellular Therapies and Stem Cell Applications Highlight Fourth Annual Conference on Regenerative Medicine in Washington, D.C.=-

Highlights of...

http://home.businesswire.com/portal/site/google/index.jsp?ndmViewId=news_view&newsId=20031014005975&newsLang=en

http://www.news.scotsman.com/latest.cfm?id=2051289

LARCHMONT, N.Y.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Oct. 14, 2003--The very latest research and clinical applications of cellular therapies and stem cell transplantation will be the focus of four presentations by leading researchers at the Fourth Annual Conference on Regenerative Medicine. With an emphasis on "Rebuilding the Body, Restoring Function," the Conference is jointly sponsored by Genetic Engineering News, a publication of (www.liebertpub.com), the University of South Florida College of Medicine, and the Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Biology Society, and is presented by BioConferences International. The complete program including summaries of the presentations can be viewed at www.bioconferences.com/ebio.

Professor Ian Wilmut of the Roslin Institute will chair the session entitled "Cellular Therapies--Repairing the Damaged and Worn Body" and will deliver a presentation on "Nuclear Transfer as a Source of Cells for Therapy: Two Methods for Producing Immunologically Matched Cells." Approaches for overcoming the problem of immune rejection are the focus of two presentations: a talk by Roger Pedersen, Ph.D. from the Department of Surgery, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital on "Stem Cell Medicine Encounters the Immune System: Strategies for Avoiding Rejection"; and a discussion of "Purified Hematopoietic Stem Cells and the Induction of Immune Tolerance" by Judith A. Shizuru, M.D., Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Medicine at Stanford University School of Medicine. Taking an in-depth look at therapeutic applications of cellular therapies, Margaret A. Goodell, Ph.D., Assistant Professor, Center for Cell & Gene Therapy at Baylor College of Medicine, will speak on "The Derivation and Value of Hematopoietic Side Population Cells."

World-class scientists from leading academic centers, industry, and government research institutions will also present their most recent findings from the laboratory and the clinic during conference sessions that will focus on Substitutive Medicine: Organ Replacement and Repair, Exploring New Frontiers in Alzheimer's Disease, and Tissue Engineering.

Good Stuff.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ANTI-STEM CELLS WITH BITE!=-

Highlights of...

http://www.family.org/cforum/fnif/news/a0028369.cfm

Eh, just click on the link if you really want to read it. [lol]
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 16 2003, 06:59 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-="Pro-Life" in a Bind=-

Highlights of...

http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServerpagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1066255810343&call_pageid=968332188774&col=968350116467

QUOTE
OTTAWA (CP) — If pro-life MPs kill the government's bill on stem-cell research they will clear the way for such research to proceed in unregulated and potentially unethical fashion, scientists say.

The bill's demise would leave a wide-open field for human stem-cell research in the private sector, said Ron Worton, vice-president of research at the Ottawa Hospital.

It won't make any difference to ethical researchers since the work will proceed in any case, Worton in said an interview today.

"The sad thing is that if the legislation fails, they (legislators) don't put in the checks and balances that I think really are necessary, like cloning human beings, for example."

It would be an ironic outcome for the social conservatives who have fought the legislation because of ethical concerns, says Worton, and scientific adviser to the Stem Cell Network.

He sees little likelihood that the bill will pass, even though Health Minister Anne McLellan and House Leader Don Boudria insist it is a priority.

"I think everyone recognizes now this legislation has been on the books for quite a long time, they've had ample opportunity to pass it if they were going to."

Under the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, "therapeutic" cloning — cloning of human embryos for research purposes, also referred to as nuclear cell transfer — would be banned.

Researchers would only be allowed to use surplus embryos produced in the course of infertility treatment — embryos which would otherwise be treated as medical waste.

The Canadian Institutes for Health Research, a federal agency, has its own guidelines that ban therapeutic cloning, but they are only binding on the work that the agency funds. Those guidelines can also be revised without Parliamentary debate.

Many researchers believe the door for therapeutic cloning, already allowed in Britain, should be left open.

"We need to have a flexible, forward-looking regulatory system," says Michael Rudnicki, director of the nuclear medicine program at the Ottawa Health Research Institute.

"Making specific experiments illegal is antithetical to our whole western civilization, frankly, and is unprecedented in Western democracies."

Rudnicki believes most Canadian see therapeutic cloning as akin to organ donation.

"These embryos will be used to make embryonic stem cells which potentially will have therapeutic use down the road.

"Personally I think that making Dolly-the-sheep type cloning illegal to produce humans is something that most Canadians would agree with.

"I think the provision about making nuclear transfer technology, so-called therapeutic cloning illegal, is not wise."

The CIHR has delayed funding for embryonic stem-cell research while the bill is under debate, but it's expected to start approving projects if the bill fails.

A CIHR spokeswoman said a committee is being set up to make recommendations on funding.

Oct. 15, 2003. 08:20 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 16 2003, 11:49 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Better Cell Culture Medium=-

http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/031016/nyth124_1.html

If you dare to open up Thrombo's website make sure you don't have heart conditions.

QUOTE
Dr. Jean Marie Stassen Presents Data at International Stem Cell Conference

DUBLIN, Ireland, Oct. 16 /PRNewswire/ -- ThromboGenics Ltd. is pleased to announce that Dr. Jean Marie Stassen, Head of R&D and a leading European researcher in pre-clinical cardiovascular therapeutics, presented "An Improved Medium for Stem Cell Culture" at the Stem Cells Regenerative Medicine conference in Princeton, NJ, USA on October 15, 2003.
Dr. Stassen spoke about a new embryonic stem (ES) cell culture medium developed by Thromb-X, NV (www.thromb-x.com), the R&D subsidiary of ThromboGenics, in Leuven, Belgium. The proprietary ES cell culture medium (called TX-WES), conditioned by a fibroblast cell line, allows derivation and maintenance of ES cell lines from all inbred mouse strains tested, including strains that were presumed to be non-permissive for ES cell derivation. The research expands upon results cited recently in the journal Stem Cells, in which the ES cell culture medium was used for expanding murine cell populations.

"The advanced technology used in this stem cell platform has been applied by ThromboGenics to identify three novel compounds now in various stages of therapeutic development -- microplasmin, placental growth factor (PlGF) and anti-Gas6," explained Dr. Stassen, who is based at the University of Leuven's Centre for Molecular and Vascular Biology. "Thromb-X has taken measures to make this technology available to other researchers for use in drug discovery."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source: Strategic Research Institute

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=IMPORTANT STUDY: A MUST READ!!!=-

This is great! I am glad we can now see this empirically. But I don't want to rely on multi-nucleated cells to live longer. There would come a time when too many is a crowd. And if they only fuse I would rather deal with making ESCs more plasticit. Yes, I know this takes time and it good for now but in the grand scheme of things - this will not do. -Bates

http://mednews.stanford.edu/news_releases_html/2003/octrelease/purkinje.htm

QUOTE
STANFORD, Calif. ­ Bone marrow cells can fuse with specialized brain cells, possibly bolstering the brain cells or repairing damage, according to research from the Stanford University School of Medicine. This finding helps resolve an ongoing debate: Do adult stem cells transform from bone marrow cells into other cell types, such as brain, muscle or liver cells, or do they fuse with those cells to form a single entity with two nuclei? The research shows that for complex brain cells called Purkinje cells, fusion is the normal pathway.

Helen Blau, PhD, the Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Professor of Pharmacology, had previously shown that transplanted bone marrow cells can wind their way up to the brain in humans where they take on characteristics of Purkinje cells – large cells in the part of the brain that controls muscular movement and balance. She had also shown that mature cells in a lab dish can fuse with other cell types and take on characteristics of those cells.

In her most recent work, published in the Oct. 16 advance online issue of Nature Cell Biology, Blau showed that the bone marrow cells in mice fuse with existing Purkinje cells and activate genes normally made in Purkinje cell nuclei. The work will also be published in the November issue of the journal.

“I think that fusion might be a really important biological mechanism,” Blau said. She said researchers previously considered fusion to be less medically important than the idea that bone marrow cells may be able to change fates entirely. Blau disagrees with that assessment. “Fusion might be a sophisticated mechanism for rescuing complex damaged cells,” she said.

Blau and senior research scientist James Weimann, PhD, transplanted mice with bone marrow cells that had been genetically altered to produce a fluorescent green protein. Over the course of the next 18 months (75 percent of a mouse’s life span), they looked for signs of fluorescent green cells in the animals’ brains.

Over time, the group found an increasing number of Purkinje cells that glowed green under a microscope. Looking closely at these cells, they found two nuclei – one from the original Purkinje cell and one from the fused bone marrow cell. They also found that the compact nucleus of the bone marrow cell expanded over time to take on the appearance of the more loosely packed Purkinje cell nucleus.

The bone marrow nucleus in the fused cell also acts like a Purkinje cell nucleus, they found. When the group transplanted mice with bone marrow cells that only glow green when Purkinje cell genes are active, they found normal-looking Purkinje cells that glowed green. This showed that the bone marrow cells had fused with Purkinje cells and activated Purkinje cell genes.

Blau said the next step is to learn under what circumstances bone marrow cells fuse with Purkinje cells. “If you know what those signals are, you could deliver the signal to damaged tissue and recruit the body’s own bone marrow cells to treat disease.” Blau hopes these recruited bone marrow cells may be a way of repairing damage caused by injury, stroke or such illnesses Parkinson’s disease.

Other Stanford researchers who participated in the study include postdoctoral scholar Clas Johansson, PhD, and research associate Angelica Trejo.


----------------------------------------------------------------

Marrow stem cells have limited use, study finds
Restorative qualities observed only in embryonic matter
David Perlman, Chronicle Science Editor
Thursday, October 16, 2003
©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback


URL: sfgate.com/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2003/10/16/MNGBH2CEI81.DTL


QUOTE
Two research teams at UCSF and Stanford have discovered evidence that stem cells from adult bone marrow do not create a wide variety of cells in the body the way cells from embryos do -- a finding that could add fresh controversy to scientific and political battles over the issue.

The adult bone marrow cells appear to fuse with existing cells of the heart, liver and brain rather than differentiating into entirely new ones, the scientists said. The studies suggest that only embryonic cells have the potential to regenerate diseased tissues.

However, in the case of brain cells, the fusion may itself provide new paths to therapies for brain disorders, according to the Stanford scientists.

The findings were just published on the Internet -- one from UCSF in the advance online edition of the British scientific journal Nature, and the other from Stanford in the online edition of the related journal Nature Cell Biology. The two journals will carry the reports separately in future printed editions.

In both studies, the experimenters have been working with bone marrow from adult mice rather than embryos in order to learn whether -- as some scientists have claimed -- the adult marrow cells could differentiate into a wide variety of new cells that might be harvested to replace the damaged or destroyed cells that mark many diseases.

Instead of differentiating, however, the researchers found that the adult marrow cells fused with existing cells of the heart, liver and brain. Each fused cell contained two curiously distinct nuclei -- one from the original bone marrow cell and one from the cell with which the marrow cell had fused.

Whether such fused cells might eventually prove useful in therapy is a question both research teams hope can be answered in further research.

The Stanford team is headed by Helen M. Blau, director of the university's Baxter Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, while the leading author of the other report is Arturo Alvarez-Buylla, a professor of neurosurgery at UCSF.

Stem cells taken from embryos have been shown in many experiments to be capable of differentiating into virtually all cells of the body. Many scientists are highly optimistic that with more research, these stem cells will be able to replace damaged or nonfunctioning cells and thereby fight a broad variety of diseases.

But politically conservative members of Congress and the Bush administration have strongly opposed the use of newly created embryonic stem cells on the ground that exploiting the tissue of embryos would be highly immoral.

Theory not supported

A few scientists supporting that view have held that adult stem cells might prove at least as versatile, and suggested that research should focus primarily on their use while research using embryonic cells should be banned completely. But the Stanford and UCSF studies raise new questions about the usefulness of stem cells from adult bone marrow.

Still, Sean J. Morrison of the University of Michigan, who was one of Alvarez-Buylla's collaborators in the UCSF work, said that the newly- discovered phenomenon of cell fusion might be exploited for certain therapies.

"My hunch is that fusion might be a mechanism that the body has devised to import DNA from blood cells into damaged cells in various tissues,'' Alvarez-Buylla said. "This is an area we should be investigating thoroughly."

He and his colleagues cautioned, however, that clinical trials to study whether implanting bone marrow cells derived from adults could be used to replenish damaged cells in patients with diseases of the heart, liver or brain should be postponed until more research clears up the question.

Cells don't divide

Blau's team at Stanford looked specifically at the way adult bone marrow cells fused with cells in the brain known as Purkinje neurons. The fused cells do not divide, and thus cannot cause cancer. In addition, genes are activated in the fused cells that could endow them with therapeutic uses.

"Fusion can provide rescue from death and lead to tissue regeneration,'' Blau said. "Different stem cells are likely to have different advantages for different purposes. I like following the biology and keeping an open mind to what nature has to tell us.

"We need to study all types of stem cells. We know too little about each. And it seems likely that for different diseases one type may be more suitable than another. We can't predict at this point what will be therapeutically optimal and for what diseases.''


E-mail Dave Perlman at dperlman@sfchronicle.com.

©2003 San Francisco Chronicle | Feedback

Page A - 6
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 18 2003, 07:14 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Discovery Science Channel's: ESCs Episode=-

An episode of How to Build a Human (Topic is Stem Cells) (1 Hour) talks about using embryos with somatic cells to help regrow spinal injuries which resulted in paralysis. A really cool part was when they started hinting as this being a key for extending life. We have a mainstream 'science to layman' show helping in the understanding process. Its good to know.

Sidenote:

http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=43036
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 20 2003, 04:33 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Columnist Lets HU-Mice go to His Head=-

Highlights of...

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/20/opinion/20SAFI.htmlex=1067227200&en=8ed4d5f7d8fd742b&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

QUOTE
But in a recent experiment in South Korea, geneticists say they have added human embryonic cells — stem cells, with the ability to turn into brain, sperm or any type of cell — into the embryos of mice. That's unethical; down that road lies a chimera. In Greek mythology, that was the name of a fire-breathing monster combining lion, goat and snake; the name was adopted by modern scientists to mean "an organism with two or more genetically different types of cells."

Do we really want to cross a man with a mouse? Are we comfortable endowing a fellow primate like a chimpanzee with uniquely human characteristics — and all the half-human rights that would entail — in the name of medical research?


Yea...
OK, reality check here. They are trying to further the understanding of embryo plasticity. The results where few active humans cells mixed in with the rest. We didn't have Stewart Little writing existential-like while counting down the days to his early demise. Moving on though.
--------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE
Today's longheaded thoughts are occasioned by the release of a rarity: a profound and readable report produced by a government committee. "Beyond Therapy: Biotechnology and the Pursuit of Happiness," by the President's Council on Bioethics, is at www.bioethics.gov. It poses the big questions fairly and lays out the data for futuristic debate. Because it runs over 300 pages, you might want to download the 24-page introduction by Dr. Leon Kass, the council chairman, and wait for some alert publisher to rush the report out in paperback.

In The Times's special issue at the turn of the millennium, I facetiously headlined an optimistic column about increased life expectancy "Why Die?" The council reports evidence suggesting that "a unified process of senescence does indeed exist" and that it may well be possible for biotechnology to achieve "age retardation," redoubling the past century's doubling of life span — but with lively old minds and healthy old bodies.


_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Embryo Stock Numbers to Come Out Soon=-

Highlights of...

http://www.canada.com/ottawa/story.asp?id=EE331E1A-4967-45E8-BF8D-655D65EF5026

QUOTE
"It is a fact that research is going on on embryos in this country and has been explicitly permitted since 1987," said Baylis, who is about to publish a study on the availability of surplus embryos for research in Canada.

She said any high-quality fertility clinic that is seeking to improve success rates will train staff and conduct research using surplus embryos.

"If you're a person who's . . . having to manipulate a human embryo, you've got to learn to do it, right? What do you think you're going to learn on?"


I will post the report when it does, with pleasure.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 20 2003, 07:28 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Reeve Is Still Kicking=-

Highlights of...

http://www.freelancestar.com/News/FLS/2003/102003/10202003/1136980

QUOTE
"You won't find the answers by looking to the stars. It's a journey you'll have to take by looking at yourself. You must write your own destiny."

--Reeves on Smallville

Still, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., a top Bush administration ally and the only physician in the Senate, has said he supports federal funding of embryonic-stem-cell research.

Reeve believes that kind of support underlines his contention that the president's decision was made for purely political reasons, to placate the religious right.

And he's had private conversations with elected officials who were opposed to research using embryonic stem cells. Some subsequently changed their minds. Others wouldn't budge.

"When Orrin Hatch [R-Utah] was making up his mind about embryonic-stem-cell research, he listened to a wide variety of experts and finally decided that even though he's pro-life, that being pro-life means being for saving lives," he said.

Frist joins a group of anti-abortion politicians including Hatch and Sen. Gordon Smith, (R-Ore.), who have urged Bush to allow the use of federal dollars for research because of the embryonic cells' potential to fight disease.

There's a bill in the Senate that would fund research, but not enough votes to override a promised presidential veto, so it's unlikely the bill will come to the floor during Bush's presidency.

So Reeve is championing a different kind of political effort.

"I think that it will take a grass-roots movement similar to the one that forced the federal government to fund AIDS research in the late '80s," he said. "Today, the NIH spends $1.8 billion a year on AIDS research. That's because the public demanded it."

Reeve said he believes other states will follow the lead of California and pass their own versions of a bill that supports research on stem cells derived from any source.

"When the state-based initiatives succeed," he said, "it will a be a breakthrough for our scientists and an enormous boost for our economy, because it will represent new opportunities for the pharmaceutical companies and encourage new venture capitalists. And once that happens, I don't see the federal government attempting to reverse it."

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: chubtoad Oct 20 2003, 11:23 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Fusing bringing more Doubts?=-

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031020055238.htm

Source: University Of California, San Francisco
Date: 2003-10-20

QUOTE
Doubts About Bone Marrow-Derived Adult Stem Cells Ability To Differentiate
A study led by UCSF investigators indicates that bone marrow-derived cells from mice that are transplanted into other mice fuse with cells in the animals’ heart, brain and liver, and take on their characteristics. The finding is significant in part because it offers strong, new evidence that bone marrow-derived cells do not actually differentiate into specialized cells themselves, a goal of some cell-transplant therapy.

The findings, reported in the advance, on-line issue of Nature on Oct. 12, contrast with previous studies that have suggested adult stem cells derived from the bone marrow -- a spongy tissue inside bones that makes blood cells -- were capable of specializing not just into blood cells, but into cells of the brain, heart and other tissues. These studies have raised hopes that cells that are progenitors of blood could be used to replace damaged tissue in critical organs.

The new findings provide the first indication that cell fusion, rather than differentiation, occurs when bone marrow-derived cells migrate to the heart and the brain of mice. They also support previous studies showing fusion of blood cells in liver, and in cell-culture.

Given this evidence, the researchers say, clinical trials to study whether implanted bone marrow-derived cells could be used to replenish damaged cells in patients with diseases of the heart, brain and liver should be postponed until more research has been conducted.

“Our study raises serious questions about whether bone marrow-derived cells are capable of trans-differentiation,” says the senior author of the study, Arturo Alvarez-Buylla, PhD, professor of neurosurgery at University of California, San Francisco (UCSF).

“The finding raises major questions about the plasticity of adult blood stem cells,” says co-author Sean J. Morrison, PhD, a Howard Hughes Medical Institute assistant investigator and assistant professor of internal medicine and of cell and development biology at University of Michigan.

At the same time, cell fusion, itself, should be explored further, the researchers write in their paper, suggesting that it might contribute to development and maintenance of some cell types, and could be one of the body’s strategies for repairing damaged cells. “My hunch is that fusion might be a physiological mechanism that the body has devised to import DNA from blood cells into damaged cells in various tissues,” says Alvarez-Buylla.

If fusion does play a role in repair of cells in the body, or even if it doesn’t, the new findings suggest that it might be possible to harness the technique therapeutically, he says. Earlier this year, researchers reported that bone marrow-derived cells fused with damaged liver cells in experimental mice and helped to improve their damaged livers.

In the current study, led by Manuel Alvarez-Dolado, PhD, a postdoctoral fellow in the Alvarez-Buylla lab, in collaboration with the Morrison laboratory, bone marrow cells from one set of mice were grafted into the bone marrow of another set of mice whose own marrow had been irradiated. The cells of both animal models had been genetically engineered to enable the scientists to detect if cell fusion occurred. Later, at one of two time points – two months or four months – the mice were sacrificed and their tissue examined.

The researchers determined that the cells, after circulating through the blood and migrating into different organs, fused with Purkinje neurons in the brain, cardiomyocytes (heart muscle cells) in the heart and hepatocytes in the liver, assuming their structural characteristics. The scientists detected no evidence of trans-differentiation without cell fusion. They did not detect cell fusion in skeletal muscle, gut, kidney or lung in their experiments, though it is possible, they say, that under different experimental conditions fusion might occur in these tissues.

Notably, the fused cells contained two nuclei – one nucleus (which encases the body’s genes) from the original cell and one from the blood cell. As such, they contained two sets of genetic instructions. The work raises the interesting question of how genes are controlled between the two nuclei and whether the genetic information derived from the blood contributes to the function of the host cell, says Alvarez-Buylla.

The current study provides hints, he says, that some of the genes from the bone marrow-derived cells might be down regulated, or inactive, which could explain the fused cells’ healthy appearance. Whether cell fusion can help rescue damaged cells remains to be seen, he says. In any event, he says, the discovery that cell fusion occurs, at least in an animal model, “opens up some very interesting questions about how one cell dominates over another to maintain a functional hybrid.”

“The fact that adult bone marrow-derived cells fused with pre-existing local cells, rather than trans-differentiating into new cells, under the experimental conditions that we used, means that they may do the same in the human body,” says Morrison. “Therefore, clinical trials that are based on the idea that bone marrow cells can generate new cells in tissues like the heart should be re-evaluated. We urgently need a better understanding of the functional effects of cell fusion, the circumstances under which it occurs, and what cells are capable of fusing

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: chubtoad Oct 21 2003, 09:45 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Adult Stem Cells Help: The Heart=-

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031021061315.htm

QUOTE
Preliminary Study Finds Stem Cells In Blood Restore Damaged Heart Muscle
HOUSTON -- Based on promising animal data, researchers at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center say that cells taken from a patient's own blood may one day be able to repair heart tissue that has been damaged.

While other researchers have shown that stem cells derived from bone marrow and umbilical cord blood can regenerate cardiac tissue, this study demonstrates that adult stem cells circulating in blood can also repair a heart.

In the study, published online in the current issue of the journal Circulation, the scientists found that human blood stem cells -- "master" cells that produce other types of body cells as needed -- regenerated heart muscle cells as well as artery tissue in mice whose hearts were injured.

"This takes us a big step ahead," says the lead author, Edward T. H. Yeh, M.D., professor and chair of M. D. Anderson's Department of Cardiology. "Taking stem cells from blood is a lot easier, and a lot less painful, than taking it from bone marrow.

"For patients, it would be as simple as donating blood," he says. "We would then isolate these potent cells and give them back to the patient where the damage has occurred."

While the researchers are cardiologists and cancer specialists, and are interested in treating heart failure that occurs in up to 10 percent of patients who use chemotherapy, they say such cell-based regeneration therapy could benefit patients who have had a heart attack or other injuries that have led to heart failure. "Such a therapy cannot bring back dead heart muscle, but it can help restore weakened hearts, no matter what the cause of the damage was," says Yeh.

The research also contributes more evidence to the idea that stem cells circulating in the blood can transform themselves into different organ systems as needed to repair injury -- a notion dubbed "stem cell plasticity" that is both revolutionary and controversial. The theory, pioneered by M. D. Anderson researchers Martin Körbling, M.D., and Zeev Estrov, M.D., upsets longstanding beliefs that different kinds of tissue have their own supply of stem cells to repair damage. If correct, however, stem cell plasticity could be used to repair, or even replace tissues and organs injured by cancer, say Körbling and Estrov, who are co-authors on this study.

To conduct the study, the researchers collected a supply of human stem cells from what is generally regarded as debris from the process of banking human red blood. (After blood is collected from volunteers, it is separated into white and red blood cells, and the white blood cells are usually thrown away.) The scientists collected white blood cells and then searched for those cells that express a protein (CD34+) that is known to be associated with stem cells. They then isolated cells with the CD34+ marker from the white cells.

To test whether peripheral blood stem cells could regenerate tissue, the research team used two groups of mice that were engineered not to have an immune system, so that they would not reject human cells. One group of mice was given an artificially induced heart attack, and then immediately treated with an injection of the human stem cells. The other mice, with healthy hearts, also received the stem cell therapy.

The researchers found that in mice with an injured heart, new cardiac muscle cells (myocytes) had developed at the edge of damaged tissue, and several layers of new blood vessel tissue (endothelial and smooth muscle cells) had also grown. Little evidence of such repair was found in the mice with healthy hearts, says Yeh.

"We've shown that CD34+-associated cells can actually transform into three different cells used by the heart, and that tissue damage is critical to this process," he says.

Several sources for regenerative stem cells have been suggested, such as bone marrow, cord blood and embryonic cells, but this study "demonstrates that adult blood stem cells may be an alternative to these other sources of cells for myocardial regeneration," says Yeh. "And blood is a readily available source of stem cells that does not require significant manipulation."

Yeh notes that no stem cell protocol has been approved in the United States to date, and that most human trials using stem cells (those derived from bone marrow) have taken place in Europe and South America. Still, Yeh says he hopes his research can advance in the near future

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 22 2003, 03:51 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=New Leader in Assay Research=-

Highlights of...

http://www.marketwire.com/mw/release_html_b1?release_id=58956

GeneThera company information is on the above link.

QUOTE
WHEAT RIDGE, CO -- (MARKET WIRE) -- 10/22/2003 -- GeneThera, Inc. (OTC BB: GTHA) is pleased to announce that Dr. Henry Wei has joined the GeneThera team as Director of Assay Development. Dr. Wei comes to GeneThera from an illustrious career in stem cell research and drug discovery. Most recently, Dr. Wei worked for Geron Corporation, a biopharmaceutical company located in California.

Dr. Wei has extensive experience utilizing PCR technology for gene expression assays. While working at Geron Corporation, Dr. Wei characterized gene expressions for 213 genes in many different human tissues and cells. Dr. Wei graduated with a Ph.D. from the University of Minnesota School of Medicine and completed his postdoctoral training at Yale University School of Medicine.

"I am extremely excited to have the opportunity to apply my knowledge of stem cell research to GeneThera's Integrated Technology Platform," Dr. Henry Wei stated.

Dr. Antonio Milici, CEO of GeneThera, commented, "The addition of Dr. Wei to our research team has already helped us achieve major breakthroughs in the development of our diagnostic tests and therapeutic vaccines."


Better growth factors on the horizon? We will see.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 22 2003, 07:36 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Bmi-1 and ASC Proliferation=-

Highlights of...

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-10/uomh-usf102003.php

QUOTE
When adult stem cells divide, they give rise to more stem cells, in addition to mature cells that replace dead or damaged cells in the body. So, the ability of adult stem cells to divide throughout life is necessary for the maintenance of adult tissues.

Most cells in the body are programmed to stop dividing after a limited number of cell divisions, but adult stem cells and cancer cells have the ability to continue making identical copies of themselves for long periods of time, if not indefinitely. Exactly how they do this has remained a mystery – one that scientists all over the world are trying to solve.

"This paper defines one of the mechanisms that make stem cells special," Morrison says. "We now know that Bmi-1 is an important part of the mechanism used by stem cells to persist through adult life. Certainly there are other genes involved and we need much more research to fully understand the process, but Bmi-1 is a major key to unlocking this important mechanism of self-renewal."

Since cancer cells share the secret of self-renewal with adult stem cells, Morrison says his research "raises the possibility that inappropriate activation or over-expression of Bmi-1 in stem cells could lead to uncontrolled growth and cancer."


_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=More Production News?=-

Highlights of...

http://www.reuters.co.uk/newsArticle.jhtml?type=healthNews&storyID=3668574§ion=news

QUOTE
LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists have discovered a way to increase production of stem cells in mice in a finding that could help cancer patients in need of bone marrow transplants.

The researchers identified a way to stimulate the blood-forming stem cells so that they will reproduce.

"The ability to enhance the number of stem cells an individual produces could have an immediate impact on patient care," Dr David Scadden of Massachusetts General Hospital, who headed the research team, said in a statement on Wednesday.

Hematopoietic stem cells, which can turn into any type of blood cell, are found in the outer layer of bone marrow. But they usually occur in small numbers and are not very good at reproducing.

Cancer patients who cannot produce enough stem cells may not be eligible for a bone marrow transplant, a treatment that could be their best hope for survival.

The scientists, who reported their findings in the science journal Nature, discovered while studying genetically modified mice that the parathyroid hormone could double the output of the blood-forming stem cells.

The key to the whole process was the bone-forming cells, called osteoblasts, they added.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: BruceKlein Oct 23 2003, 03:52 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
U-M Scientists Find Genetic 'Fountain Of Youth' For Adult Stem Cells
Source: University Of Michigan Health System
Date: 2003-10-23


QUOTE
ANN ARBOR, MI – Scientists at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center have identified a gene that controls the amazing ability of adult stem cells to self-renew, or make new copies of themselves, throughout life.


http://www.med.umich.edu/opm/newspage/images/cell.gif
QUOTE
Colonies of central nervous system stem cells taken from normal
mice with the Bmi-1 gene (left) are larger and much more prolific
than those from mice without the Bmi-1 gene (right).
Photo credit: Anna Molofsky, U-M Medical School.


QUOTE
In a series of extensive cell culture and animal studies, U-M scientists discovered that a gene called Bmi-1 was required for self-renewal in two types of adult stem cells – neural stem cells from the central nervous system and neural crest stem cells from the peripheral nervous system. In a previous study, other U-M scientists found that Bmi-1 also was necessary for continued self-renewal in a third variety of blood-forming or hematopoietic stem cells.

"So far, we and our colleagues have studied three important types of adult stem cells and Bmi-1 appears to work similarly in every case," says Sean Morrison, Ph.D., an assistant professor of internal medicine in the U-M Medical School and a Howard Hughes Medical Institute investigator. "This raises the intriguing possibility that Bmi-1 could be a universal regulator controlling self-renewal in all adult stem cells."

The U-M study of Bmi-1's role in central nervous system (CNS) stem cells and neural crest stem cells from the peripheral nervous system (PNS) will be published Oct. 22 in Nature's advance online edition.

Co-first authors are Anna Molofsky, a student in the M.D./Ph.D. program at the U-M Medical School, and Ricardo Pardal, Ph.D., a U-M research fellow. Previous U-M research on Bmi-1 and hematopoietic stem cells was conducted by In-Kyung Park, Ph.D., research investigator, and Michael F. Clarke, M.D., professor of internal medicine. Results from that study were published in Nature on April 20.


Complete Article: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/10/031023072126.htm
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Oct 23 2003, 04:21 PM

Look up BJ http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?s=&act=ST&f=44&t=873&st=0&#entry15479

But leave it anyway as it provides different links, more information and an additional perspective of the issue. wink.gif)

Posted by: BruceKlein Oct 23 2003, 06:31 PM

Whoops.. sorry. Feel free to edit as needed.

Posted by: Lazarus Long Oct 23 2003, 06:49 PM

Actually what you are doing is "proving the rule" While we might seem to represent "too many cooks" the alternative perspective is that we are covering one another and ensuring the best examples are found and posted. We are not even close to too much of a good thing. wink.gif)

And yes Carbon based life form Mr. Helix, please feel free to edit us both out on this thoroughly personal exchange, or leave it in to humanize the thread. I defer to your wisdom on this subject.

Posted by: Cyto Oct 24 2003, 04:42 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Someone is Desperate!=-

Highlights of...

http://www.zwire.com/site/news.cfm?newsid=10395874&BRD=1281&PAG=461&dept_id=31007&rfi=6

Do you remember Lieberman? The religious freak? Well guess what! He is now OK with ESCs!!!

QUOTE
In a wide-ranging interview with Associated Press editors and reporters, the presidential candidate waded into another medical debate, breaking with President Bush’s policy to limit scientific research involving human embryonic cells.

"The day I walk into the Oval Office, the first thing I’m going to do is rescind the Bush administration restrictions on stem-cell research," the Connecticut senator said. "They’re not compassionate. They block work that will save lives and extend lives."


*Jaw Drop* I never expected this.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

QUOTE
Bush's policy was that research could continue on stem-cell "lines" that existed at the moment of his speech, in August 2001, but that otherwise, embryo research was banned. Even surplus embryos already in the freezer at fertility clinics—where embryos are routinely created and destroyed by the thousands every year—could not be used for medical research and would have to be thrown out instead.


*sigh*

http://slate.msn.com/id/2090244/
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 24 2003, 08:00 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ESCs Help in New Cancer Understanding=-

Highlights of...

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994309

QUOTE
As cancers grow, cells often move out of the original tumour and spread around the body using the blood or lymphatic system, a process called metastasis. These widespread cancers are especially difficult to treat.

Now scientists have discovered that a surface molecule called 5T4, which is present in many different types of tumour, is also produced by embryonic stem cells (ESCs) as the embryo grows and develops.

The team has already harnessed 5T4 in human clinical trials. Because it is expressed in the embryo only, 5T4 should be treated as a foreign invader by the adult body. The team, in collaboration with Oxford BioMedica, has developed a therapeutic vaccine based on eliciting an immune response against cancer cells expressing 5T4.

"The cancer vaccine has been shown to be immunogenic and safe," Stern told New Scientist.

The team is also collaborating with Active Biotech to develop a "magic bullet" based on 5T4. They are using an antibody that latches on to the molecule to seek out tumours and deliver a drug to kill them.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Two: I HATE BUSH NEWS POSTS=-

Highlights of...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A9348-2003Oct23.html

http://www.msnbc.com/news/984730.asp?0cv=OB10

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Christian Site Has "Prayer Points"=-

It's funny, what can I say?

Highlights of...

http://www.cbn.com/CBNNews/News/031024b.asp

QUOTE
1. Pray that Congress and the medical establishment will have the wisdom and political courage to support only stem cell research that protects human life. Pray that measures supporting embyonic stem cell research will be defeated.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Oct 25 2003, 04:47 AM

Stem Cell Audio Interview - Aug 8, 2003
Executive Editor Chris Scott of Acumen Journal speaks with NPR's Talk to the Nation and updates us on the current state of the Stem Cell Discussion.

He makes the point that the stem cell lines that were allowed are not as robust as previously thought and that a good deal of research has moved from the United States. The premier stem cell corporations are suffering, ie. Geron, as their top scientists move to foreign shores taking all their knowledge with them.

He then moves on to discuss what journals are doing to support stem cell research and that adult stem cells are not proven to be the route to go at all and that the jury is still out as to their true utility. (Which is being shown with the discovery that adult stem cells have been shown to fuse with rather than differentiate into their target cell types)

http://www.kevsplace.net/Audio/AcumenJournalStemCellUpdate.wma

Posted by: Cyto Oct 26 2003, 07:08 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Singapore: All You wanted to know about the Place=-

Highlights of...

http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994309

http://www.biomed-singapore.com/bms/index.jsp
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 26 2003, 09:30 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=ASCs and ESCs Work Side-By-Side: What a Concept. [lol] =-

Highlights of...

http://www.israel21c.org/bin/en.jsp?enPage=BlankPage&enDisplay=view&enDispWhat=object&enDispWho=Articles%5El536&enZone=Technology&enVersion=0&

QUOTE
Dr. Floyd Loop, the Clinic's chief executive, and Yitzhak Apeloig, president of Technion-Israel Institute of Technology recently signed a multiyear agreement to work on molecular medicine and biomedical engineering research, starting with five projects in orthopedics and cardiology.

Penn, who works in the cardiovascular medicine and cell biology departments, said his group works with adult stem cells, while Gepstein and his colleagues work with embryonic stem cells.

Penn said researchers already know that if they "manipulate" the heart in the right way, the body's own stem cells will travel to the heart and become blood vessels. The goal now, Penn said, is to "(a) make sure we're recruiting the right stem cells from the bone marrow and (b) convince them to differentiate into cardiac myocytes," or contracting cells.
_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 27 2003, 08:34 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=MEP's Trying to Further Stem Cell Restrictions=-

Highlights of...

http://dbs.cordis.lu/cgi-bin/srchidadb?CALLER=NHP_EN_NEWS&ACTION=D&SESSION=&RCN=EN_RCN_ID:21106

QUOTE
German MEP Peter Liese, the European Parliament's rapporteur on new proposals for the EU funding of embryonic stem cell research, will argue for a more restrictive approach than that foreseen by the Commission when he publishes his report in early November.

While the Commission envisages EU funding for projects that aim to create new stem cell lines from frozen embryos created for IVF purposes before 27 June 2002, Mr Liese's plan would only allow research to be carried out using existing stem cell lines created before August 2001. ( [?]  [!] )

Furthermore, Mr Liese would like to see priority given to projects that aim to carry out research using adult stem cells. ( [huh] )

Details of the proposals contained in the draft report were outlined to journalists at a press conference in Strasbourg, France, on 22 October. A vocal opponent of embryonic stem cell research, Mr Liese stated that there are compelling reasons to completely exclude this type of activity from the EU's research programmes, but accepted that such a position would be unlikely to produce a political agreement.

In drafting his proposals, Mr Liese drew extensively on US guidelines for public funding of stem cell research where, similarly, scientists must work with stem cell lines procured before 7 August 2001. Mr Liese's argument is that stem cells from those lines used by publicly funded researchers in the US can be sent to Europe for use in EU projects.

'This compromise represents a very great concession by opponents of embryonic stem cell research to its supporters,' concluded Mr Liese.


_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Some Molecular Bio of Stem Cells=-

Highlights of...

http://www.jcb.org/cgi/content/abstract/163/2/303

QUOTE
The molecular mechanisms controlling inductive events leading to the specification and terminal differentiation of cardiomyocytes are still largely unknown. We have investigated the role of Cripto, an EGF-CFC factor, in the earliest stages of cardiomyogenesis. We find that both the timing of initiation and the duration of Cripto signaling are crucial for priming differentiation of embryonic stem (ES) cells into cardiomyocytes, indicating that Cripto acts early to determine the cardiac fate. Furthermore, we show that failure to activate Cripto signaling in this early window of time results in a direct conversion of ES cells into a neural fate. Moreover, the induction of Cripto activates the Smad2 pathway, and overexpression of activated forms of type I receptor ActRIB compensates for the lack of Cripto signaling in promoting cardiomyogenesis. Finally, we show that Nodal antagonists inhibit Cripto-regulated cardiomyocyte induction and differentiation in ES cells. All together our findings provide evidence for a novel role of the Nodal/Cripto/Alk4 pathway in this process.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: kevin Oct 27 2003, 09:19 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Umbilical Cord Stem Cells=-

Highlights of...

http://www.redflagsweekly.com/conferences/damaged_brains/oct07_Braly.html

QUOTE
Graft Versus Host Disease

New methods of separating stem cells from all other blood components associated with Graft Versus Host disease have resulted in a product that consists of only stem cells. Since these umbilical cord stem cells are immature and have not developed ABO and HLA antigens on their surfaces, they do not induce graft versus host reactions that may occur with embryonic, bone marrow stem cells or to a lesser degree, cord blood. Since the umbilical cord stem cells do not contain mature blood or tissue cells, foreign protein reactions do not occur. This is important because immune suppressive chemotherapies and radiation used in the past with bone marrow and cord blood transplants are toxic to stem cells and new neurons. Both chemotherapy and radiation are associated with neurotoxicity and symptoms of memory loss, depression, and declining IQ scores.

Therefore if "pure" umbilical cord derived stem cells (separated from blood components) are safe enough to use without immune suppressive therapies, the stem cell therapy should be more effective. This is what is being reported from patients being treated in other countries. CD34+ stem cells extracted from cord blood are being reported as safe and effective without the use of immune suppression.


--------------------
And some comments regarding the article by Carbonix..
--------------------
While I love this link you have found I still smell the "ever pervading stench" of anti-ESC.

QUOTE
Embryonic lines that are approved for research may be losing their potency over time.


If we are talking about Bush stem cells then yea I agree that they are crap. One article from StemCells.com speaks different on maintaining a highly-fidelic culture for 12-months+. So I think he is only talking about Bush. I know I posted about a man questioning the fidelity of embryos and how they affect SC quality but that was not a peer-paper but a 'man raising a question.' I discount that since I want papers, not fluff.

QUOTE
They may contain mouse feeder cells and no longer be "pure" human cells.


Yea yea Bush sucks.

QUOTE
In addition, serious Graft Versus Host complications have been reported in patients treated with embryonic stem cells outside the U.S. This could result from embryos having genetic aberrations and diseases from uncontrolled parental sources.


I agree. Sounds like these 'sources' were rushing past a vital step that is required in SC work areas. Any idiot should know to test the cell stability first. And some ESCs just don't take to the SCNT.

QUOTE
Quality control for purity and potency is a major concern with the use of embryonic stem cells.


Just the same w/ all of stem cells you dolt. ESCs may not fuse like SCs but Im not looking for that in LE. They still diffentiate just fine though.

purity and potency
QUOTE
We know at this point that a million stem cells per treatment is more effective than 300,000 stem cells and the larger dosage further reduces Graft Versus Host complications. Therefore if "pure" umbilical cord derived stem cells (separated from blood components) are safe enough to use without immune suppressive therapies, the stem cell therapy should be more effective.


I want a paper where they have Green-Fluorescence tagged the cells to see what all happens.

Posted by: Cyto Oct 29 2003, 02:23 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Singapore Hosts World Stem Cell Gathering=-

Highlights of...

http://www.timesdaily.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031028/API/310280623

QUOTE
Organizers were hoping to use the three-day event as a chance to showcase the tiny island's budding biomedical sector.

With strong governmental support, Singapore has become a center for research into human embryonic stem cells (oh so true) - master cells that can grow into almost any tissue in the body. Scientists hope to use them one day to replace unhealthy cells as a cure for a variety of diseases.

"Most of the big names are here," said Dr. Ariff Bongso, a Singapore scientist who became the first to grow human stem cells without using animal cells in June 2002.

"The whole purpose of this meeting is to show them our Biopolis," Bongso said.


Read the article for more...

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=$5m funding ($5.2 million) for stem cell research=-

Highlights of...

http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/topstories/story/0,4386,216874,00.html

QUOTE
Said its chair of research, Mrs Margery Perry: 'Singapore has taken the lead in showing the world how to deal with stem cell research. That's why we decided to come here.'


They are using ESCs. fyi...

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Canada House backs embryonic stem cell research=-

Highlights of...

http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/N28278620.htm

QUOTE
The battle over the bill has become a surrogate debate over abortion -- a legal medical procedure in Canada -- because of the implications of whether embryos are human beings. It has also become tangled in the political flux surrounding the transition of power in Ottawa.

"They either go in the garbage or they go to the lab," Liberal legislator Carolyn Bennett, who is a medical doctor, told Reuters.


_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Stem cells grown into tissues - 10/28/2003=-

Highlights of...

http://www.boston.com/yourlife/health/diseases/articles/2003/10/28/stem_cells_grown_into_tissues/

QUOTE
Much remains to be done before the findings can make a difference in the operating room. Langer and colleagues write that further research is needed to "allay concerns regarding the potential" of embryonic stem cells to turn cancerous. Levenberg said the MIT researchers had tested the cells for normalcy and found that none seemed to have the potential to turn cancerous.

In previous tissue-engineering research, scientists used more-developed stem cells from adult organs. But because these cells proliferate relatively slowly and are specific to particular organs, researchers did not have much success generating new organs.

The lab-made organs also performed better because the mice's blood vessels treated them as normal tissue, sprouting new blood vessels that penetrated into the organs.

In similar experiments using adult cells, this did not occur.


_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=IMPORTANT TO NOTE=-

Highlights of...

http://straitstimes.asia1.com.sg/techscience/story/0,4386,217106,00.html

QUOTE
Elaborating on his team's latest findings during a break at the international stem cell conference here yesterday, he added: 'Another plus is that the mother would have been screened for diseases such as HIV and hepatitis B when she gives up the embryo for research, so we would not have to screen the skin sample again.'

Professor Lee Eng Hin, head of the NUS division of graduate medical studies, added: 'This work is very exciting because you need cell lines to be completely animal-free if research is to be taken from the bench to the bedside.'

The research was published last month in the journal Stem Cells.

ES Cell is now working on creating colonies of the unprogrammed cells that can be used safely for trials in patients.

But currently, cell lines, including those developed by Singapore-based ES Cell International and a handful of other companies worldwide, are nourished with animal cells.

This means they cannot be used in trials involving people because of the danger of transmitting animal diseases.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Lazarus Long Oct 29 2003, 02:03 PM

This thread should now be cross linked with the thread http://imminst.org/forum/index.php?act=ST&f=1&t=2006&hl=&s= because not only is that a specific offshoot of this discussion, it may turn into a formidable battle in its own right, whose divisions and alliances, as well as results could herald much about how events will progress over the next few decades.

Here is an article about Christopher Reeve that I think also deserves mention because he is turning into a powerful spokesperson and supporter our efforts in general and the links on the page outline possible groups we should be reaching out towards for networking our efforts.

LL

***********
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=585&e=8&u=/nm/20031028/sc_nm/science_stemcells_dc

Actor Reeve: States Will Lead Stem Cell Research
Mon Oct 27, 8:14 PM ET Science - Reuters
By Alicia Ault

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - While the federal government continues to restrict research on stem cells taken from embryos, states are trying to create legal loopholes for scientists to continue what could be life-saving experiments, actor and activist Christopher Reeve said on Monday.

So far, only California has passed a law that allows the use of state funds for research into harvesting and using stem cells from any source, including embryos. But other states are moving in that direction, Reeve said.

"A half-dozen or more key states will lead the way," Reeve said in an interview after a briefing commemorating the fifth anniversary of the first isolation of human stem cell lines from embryos.

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=585&e=8&u=/nm/20031028/sc_nm/science_stemcells_dc

*********************

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20031028/ap_on_sc/stem_cell_research&e=4

Human Stem Cell Work May Start in 5 Years
Tue Oct 28,10:09 AM ET Add Science - AP
By RANDOLPH E. SCHMID, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The pioneers of stem cell research said Monday they expect clinical trials in humans within five years.

Political opposition and limited federal funding have delayed efforts to learn how the cells can be used, but work is beginning to progress, James Thomson and John Gearhart said at a briefing at the National Press Club.

The session marked the fifth anniversary of their publication of pioneering research papers on stem cells, the basic cells of early development that can grow into any body part.

Thomson, of the University of Wisconsin-Madison, was the first to isolate and cultivate human embryonic stem cells. Gearhart, of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, was first to isolate and culture human germ cells.
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story2&u=/ap/20031028/ap_on_sc/stem_cell_research&e=4


**********************

We need a serious outreach at the UW. I suspect as my coverage keeps coming back to work being performed at that institution. This Dr. Thomson should be lauded and I suspect many groups at my old Madison campus are taking their ancient political positions rather than re-thinking and understanding how to make this a win/win scenario.

LL

Posted by: Cyto Oct 29 2003, 09:00 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Interesting News Bits (Well the first one is)=-

Highlights of...

http://www.azdailysun.com/non_sec/nav_includes/story.cfm?storyID=75791

QUOTE
"The corporate repercussions are gathering with this policy," Scott said. "Geron, arguably the best stem cell company in the world, is now down to 50 percent of its employees."

Scott said that some top biologists in the field have left to the Pacific Rim, where the research is encouraged, and CEOs have threatened to resign.

"There are actually venture firms here in the United States that are losing to Japan to do this research," he said.


QUOTE
Scott said that Bush's administration has been inconsistent in its views because it still funded the creation of embryos for in vitro fertilization.

"It's OK to produce a dozen or so embryos in a clinic in the attempt to become pregnant, but it's not OK to produce some for the intention of stem cell research," Scott said.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 30 2003, 04:32 PM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Anti-stem Cells Speech in EU=-

Highlights of...

http://www.zenit.org/german/visualizza.phtml?sid=43629

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Mass. In Research=-

Highlights of...

http://www.projo.com/ap/ma/1067473376.htm

QUOTE
BOSTON (AP) - Massachusetts would actively encourage research using stem cells, gathered in part from embryos discarded from fertility clinics, under a proposal to be unveiled by Senate President Robert Travaglini on Thursday.

Supporters of the proposal - included in a $115 million stimulus package designed to help jumpstart the state's flagging economy - say they want to follow in the footsteps of California, which passed a first-in-the-nation law last year allowing stem cell research.

"This sends a message to the biotech industry that the state is going to support your efforts to do embryonic stem cell research," said Ann Dufresne, a spokeswoman for Travaglini. "We have the potential to make medical breakthroughs for a whole host of illnesses."

Dufresne said the measure would only allow research on donor embryos that are not going to be used by couples. She said the issue received a public hearing earlier this year when lawmakers took testimony on a similar bill.

Stem cell research is a relatively new issue on Beacon Hill.

In April, lawmakers held a hearing on a bill sponsored by Sen. Cynthia Creem, D-Newton, that would make Massachusetts the second state in the nation to authorize such research, while imposing a ban on reproductive cloning.

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________

Posted by: Cyto Oct 31 2003, 03:31 AM

_____________________________________________
______________________________________________
-=Anti-ECs=-

Highlights of...

http://http://www.eagleherald.com/lyons103.htm

QUOTE
The Human Embryo Protection Act would protect living human embryos from intentional destruction. "What this would do is say no public or private entity in Wisconsin could create human embryos, destroy them, transfer, sell or buy them for the purpose of medical research," Lyons said.

The proposed law is a major issue here in Wisconsin because it was researchers at UW-Madison who in 1998 began experiments on living human embryos obtained from infertility clinics. "(The law) essentially would prohibit what they're doing at the University of Wisconsin and prohibit private companies from engaging in the same activity," Lyons said.

Lyons says researchers want to develop clones to use in their experiments. Eventually this usually leads to the destruction of human embryos.

"They're working on developing an artificial womb," she said. "When you have an embryo, you just have cells, but when you put the embryo into an artificial womb it grows -- you've got livers, kidneys and hearts. -- It&