• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans


Adverts help to support the work of this non-profit organisation. To go ad-free join as a Member.


Photo
- - - - -

Which word meets Gobel's challenge?


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

Poll: Which word meets Gobel's challenge? (alphabetical) (37 member(s) have cast votes)

Which word meets Gobel's challenge? (alphabetical)

  1. ageless (14 votes [46.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 46.67%

  2. infy (9 votes [30.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.00%

  3. rev (7 votes [23.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.33%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Bruce Klein

  • Guardian Founder
  • 8,794 posts
  • 242
  • Location:United States

Posted 01 December 2005 - 05:53 AM


Moving forward with Dave Gobel's word contest, orignial thread found here, please choose one(1) of the above terms which you think most meets Dave Gobel's prize ($100) request for word to describe future people who do not age.

Posted Image

Poll Ends: Dec 31 2005

ORIGINATIONS

ageless - (Originator: John Schloendorn)
----
infy - (Originator: Infernity)

1. At the core, he wants to be an infineon.
2. She managed to reverse her aging process, she's now part of the infy crowd.

----
rev - (Originator: Nate Barna)

revirescent (rev ih RES unt) adj. growing young or strong again
revirescence n.
This word seems to precisely describe an inverse perpetuation of getting chronologically older while getting physically younger.
The Revirescentians.


Reference:

Would you consider doing something for me? It drives me nuts that we do not have an adjective to describe someone who has many years, but has a biological age of a 26year old. We have "young" and "old" but not a word to describe a healthy, hearty and exuberant 500 year old...a word that would be attractive and desirable to "become". The closest I've been able to come is superannuated meaning 'lots of years', but it's not positive and too abstruse - not suitable for "marketing".

Would you consider doing a contest for folks to invent a cool word for this? The only thing I ask is that we capture email addresses and that MF would get a copy of the list generated...We would be willing to offer a $100 bounty to the winner - I'd suggest that the winner be derived by a multivote system if you're familiar with that method.

Then we can begin to memefect the language with the new word.

Dave Gobel
Exec Dir
Methuselah Foundation



#2 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 03 December 2005 - 02:14 PM

Hey everyone. Be a part of the future. Vote in the poll

#3 manspeaker

  • Guest
  • 12 posts
  • 0

Posted 03 December 2005 - 04:18 PM

HOW ABOUT SIMPLY USING THE WORD: IMMORTAL
MANSPEAKER19

sponsored ad

  • Advert

#4 icyT

  • Guest
  • 326 posts
  • 2
  • Location:Canada
  • NO

Posted 04 December 2005 - 08:54 AM

Probably because you're not immortal, which is often thought of as unkillable. I wouldn't say ageless, because you age in number and through time, and physically develope, just not degenerate.

On that note, I am inspired. They're normally called Geriatrics right? How about Degeriatrics?

#5 Mind

  • Life Member, Director, Moderator, Treasurer
  • 19,058 posts
  • 2,000
  • Location:Wausau, WI

Posted 04 December 2005 - 10:53 PM

Vote, Vote, Vote.

Ageless is pretty self-explanatory and well known. Maybe too simple.
Rev is short and easy to pronounce, but is a brand new term.
Infy has "charm", but does not roll off the tongue as easily as the others.

#6 wassname

  • Guest
  • 63 posts
  • 0
  • Location:Debrecen

Posted 05 December 2005 - 11:24 AM

Noage (or nonage)?

#7 cosmic_surfer

  • Guest
  • 1 posts
  • 0

Posted 06 December 2005 - 05:28 PM

Why are you trying to use complicated terminology when a simple yet more to the point term would do? In describing a 500 year old being or a being of any age approaching infinity , they are meerly Young!

#8 fdotseth

  • Guest
  • 10 posts
  • 0

Posted 06 December 2005 - 11:17 PM

Comfortable is the only word that makes sense. Young, in our culture, is a putdown. It implies immaturity of thought. The use of infy takes us outside of our language. It implies that we have no answer. The use of rev fits into the same catagory as infy.
A comfortable person knows and believes in his/her sense of being. This sense precludes aging as a factor in life. Think - you will find that all reference to aging includes the lack of comfort with that paricular time in life.
fdotseth

#9 quadclops

  • Guest
  • 316 posts
  • -1
  • Location:Pittsburgh, PA

Posted 12 December 2005 - 08:47 PM

Kent 23--

I like "evergreen".


Me too. [thumb]

#10 JMorgan

  • Guest
  • 645 posts
  • 1
  • Location:Queens, NY

Posted 12 December 2005 - 10:17 PM

I'm not really a fan of any of the words. None of them strike me as a word that really stands out or fits completely. (That doesn't also sound awkward.)

I'll have to think about this.

#11 Bruce Klein

  • Topic Starter
  • Guardian Founder
  • 8,794 posts
  • 242
  • Location:United States

Posted 21 December 2005 - 11:48 PM

Vote for the above 3 choices remains open for 10 more days.

#12 John Schloendorn

  • Guest, Advisor, Guardian
  • 2,542 posts
  • 157
  • Location:Mountain View, CA

Posted 14 January 2006 - 04:13 AM

Poll Ends: Dec 31 2005

Heh Dave, looks like you owe me money, mate ;-)

#13 Da55id

  • Guest
  • 436 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Springfield, va
  • NO

Posted 14 January 2006 - 05:23 PM

What? Again?!

:-)

#14 Bruce Klein

  • Topic Starter
  • Guardian Founder
  • 8,794 posts
  • 242
  • Location:United States

Posted 15 January 2006 - 04:39 AM

Ah, this is correct...

Congratulations, John!

Finaly Tally:

Which word meets Gobel's challenge? (alphabetical)
ageless [ 13 ] [46.43%]
infy [ 8 ] [28.57%]
rev [ 7 ] [25.00%]

#15 Da55id

  • Guest
  • 436 posts
  • 6
  • Location:Springfield, va
  • NO

Posted 16 January 2006 - 12:36 AM

John - where should I send the check?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users