• Log in with Facebook Log in with Twitter Log In with Google      Sign In    
  • Create Account
  LongeCity
              Advocacy & Research for Unlimited Lifespans

Photo
- - - - -

Modafinil on ABC 20/20


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 erics99

  • Guest
  • 23 posts
  • -1

Posted 18 February 2007 - 12:58 AM


Did anybody catch the 20/20 segment on Modafinil last night? It should stir up some discussion I assume...the link is below.

http://abcnews.go.co...=2874922&page=1

#2 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 18 February 2007 - 01:10 AM

I always watch 20/20 and saw it. They didn't seem put much stock in its abilities above that of caffeine.

From the article (after saying some bad things about how the drug was approved and how it is marketed):

The Caffeine Comparison

"20/20" set out to discover how well Provigil worked when the studies were not funded by Cephalon.

That led us to the sleep labs of the U.S. Army. Brain scientist Nancy Wesensten studies drugs to help sleep-deprived soldiers stay awake and alert. She didn't just compare Provigil to a placebo, she compared it to America's No. 1 selling "awake drug": caffeine.

"We knew that caffeine was an effective means for sustaining performance during sleep loss," she said. "But we are always looking for other compounds that might be an improvement on caffeine, so when modafinil came along we wanted to compare modafinil to caffeine."

Wesensten compared Provigil to caffeine in terms of how well the soldiers performed on tests and how alert they were, and she also looked at side effects. The result?

"In our hands, at the dosages we tested, modafinil did not work any better than caffeine," she said.

In fact, the Army found that Provigil worked no better than the amount of caffeine you received in a big cup of Starbucks coffee. But soldiers on the battlefield don't get their caffeine in a cup of coffee, they use caffeine gum for low doses across many hours.

Whether you're getting your kick from a pill or a cup of coffee, at the end of the day, all the experts say the best answer for sleepiness is the oldest one. As Wesensten puts it:

"The ultimate cure is sleep. Nothing replaces sleep."



sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#3 basho

  • Guest
  • 774 posts
  • 1
  • Location:oʎʞoʇ

Posted 18 February 2007 - 01:34 AM

Did the 20/20 reporter actually try Provigil? I have a feeling the cynical tone of the story would be completely different coming from someone who had actually experienced the effects of modafinil.

I fully agree with the conclusion though: "The ultimate cure is sleep. Nothing replaces sleep."

#4 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 18 February 2007 - 01:46 AM

Did the 20/20 reporter actually try Provigil?  I have a feeling the cynical tone of the story would be completely different coming from someone who had actually experienced the effects of modafinil.

I fully agree with the conclusion though: "The ultimate cure is sleep. Nothing replaces sleep."


No, the reporter did not try it. The entire episode was on being deceived by companies and people, and how to avoid being deceived. They did stories on all kinds of things, like some deceptive practices of LA Weight Loss, fine print (on commercials and in car ads and things), how not to buy fake handbags, and some other things.

Another thing that they did one on is something else that would interest people here at ImmInst, was on Suzanne Summers and her claims of using bioidenticals for anti-aging purposes:
http://abcnews.go.co...=2874767&page=1

#5 thereverend5

  • Guest
  • 47 posts
  • -5

Posted 18 February 2007 - 06:51 AM

Apparently the army actually DID record multiple cases where modafinil was a clear help to maintaining alertness, so I don't know why ABC is trivializing its findings:

http://en.wikipedia....il#Military_use :

One study on helicopter pilots suggested that 600 mg of modafinil given in three doses can be used to keep pilots alert and maintain their accuracy at pre-deprivation levels for 40 hours without sleep.[13]However, significant levels of nausea and vertigo were observed. Another study of fighter pilots showed that 300 mg modafinil given in three divided 100 mg doses sustained the flight control accuracy of sleep-deprived F-117 pilots to within about 27 percent of baseline levels for 37 hours, without any considerable side effects.[14]


As you can see, most of the claims have citations.

That other ABC article shows that Suzanne Somers is a liar and a snake oil salesman who makes false claims to propagate her views. She doesn't really interest me at all =/

#6 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 18 February 2007 - 03:35 PM

Apparently the army actually DID record multiple cases where modafinil was a clear help to maintaining alertness, so I don't know why ABC is trivializing its findings:

http://en.wikipedia....il#Military_use :



As you can see, most of the claims have citations. 

Yeah, I am not sure. I think the one they were talking about in the new episode was comparing it to caffeine. I suppose the other one (that you cite) was probably comparing it to a placebo. I am not sure though, I would like to see some other independent studies on it and its effects.


That other ABC article shows that Suzanne Somers is a liar and a snake oil salesman who makes false claims to propagate her views.  She doesn't really interest me at all =/

Oh, I know. It is the same load of bs that they try to feed people about hormone replacement therapies for anti-aging purposes. (which has been covered multiple times on these boards) Suzanne Summers claims that since they are bioidenticals, that they won't have the same bad effects as artificially synthesized ones, which is clearly a load of horse hockey. It is always good to keep up on the latest anti-aging claims, though, which is why I thought it would be interesting to some folks.

#7 bgwowk

  • Guest
  • 1,715 posts
  • 125

Posted 18 February 2007 - 06:10 PM

Suzanne Summers claims that since they are bioidenticals, that they won't have the same bad effects as artificially synthesized ones, which is clearly a load of horse hockey.

That may well be true, but let's be clear. The bioidenticals are not the same molecules as used in conventional HRT. This is not the usual misconception about natural sources being better than synthetic sources of the same molecule. They are different molecules.

It is impossible to draw any conclusions about Suzanne Somers from that ABC story alone because it was so obviously a hatchet job. Science issues were barely touched on.

Edited by bgwowk, 18 February 2007 - 07:58 PM.


#8 Live Forever

  • Guest Recorder
  • 7,475 posts
  • 9
  • Location:Atlanta, GA USA

Posted 18 February 2007 - 06:27 PM

Suzanne Summers claims that since they are bioidenticals, that they won't have the same bad effects as artificially synthesized ones, which is clearly a load of horse hockey.

That may well be true, but let's be clear. The bioidenticals are not the same molecules as used in conventional HRT. This is not the usual misconception about natural sources being better than synthetic sources of the same molecule. They are different molecules.

It is impossible to draw any conclusions about Suzanne Summers from that ABC story alone because it was so obviously a hatchet job. Science issues were barely touched on.

Thanks for the insight Dr. Wowk. I had just assumed (foolishly as it seems) that the bioidenticals were for all intensive purposes the same thing. Thank you for the correction.

sponsored ad

  • Advert
Click HERE to rent this advertising spot for BRAIN HEALTH to support LongeCity (this will replace the google ad above).

#9 garcia2002

  • Guest
  • 10 posts
  • 0

Posted 05 March 2007 - 03:25 PM

sorry to jump in on this thread so late. I haven't been online in a few weeks. Anywhoo, what a crock!!?? Just like caffeine?? I don't think so. Sunday I got up a 5:30 am with children and did mommy work all day long. I took a short nap at 7pm and began a sewing project at 8. I completed said project at 7am today. Sewing project (curtains) = intense concentration, manual dexterity, math etc., I took two twenty minute breaks to eat and hydrate during that time. I am now working a desk job. Caffeine? I don't think so.

Early bed for me!




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users