No.
http://www.imminst.o...&...st&p=191942
I've already seen that answer, and it looks like you're side-stepping the question. All I see there are these:
- you said chemical peeling makes the skin more beautiful; that's beside the point - I never said it didn't; I asked "is it making the skin more beautiful
by fast-forwarding it toward its death?" and you didn't answer that (except, of course, with a simple unwarranted "No", an
ipse dixit);
- you said Hayflick's experimental conclusions don't apply to living tissues and quoted a dermatologist saying the same thing; I agree: they don't apply
exactly, with numerical values and all, but they still do apply
in principle, it remains a valid discovery that normal somatic cells
aren't immortal and
there is a limit to how many times they can divide, no matter what that number may be for various tissues
in vivo; the fact is the limit's there and any time you speed up cell replacement, you're speeding up your journey toward that limit (unless you have some proof that there are skin stem cells somewhere that can be convinced to generate fresh skin indefinitely...);
- and then you went on about the positive effects of skin peels, again ignoring the essence of my question, which is not the
immediate result of increasing cell turnover, but the
long-term effects.
So, again: does Retin-A
speed skin cells toward the end of their reproductive capacity or not? (Please keep in mind that I'm not "demanding" that
you give me an answer. I'm only insisting that this is an important question to have an answer for if one's going to commit to long-term use of strong retinoids or frequent peeling.)
Edited by donjoe, 08 February 2008 - 09:32 PM.