Apparently there was a programe on the WBAL (Balitmore) channel yesterday, about a girl who does not appear to age.
(12 years old)
Has anyone further info on the case and the scientists who investigate it?
Posted 14 May 2005 - 08:42 PM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 10:51 AM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 11:15 AM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 02:41 PM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 02:44 PM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 05:37 PM
Posted 17 May 2005 - 06:13 PM
Regardless, this doesn't change the fact that, whether the girl develops normally or not, she should still acquire damage and senesce as her chronological age increases...
Aging begins when development stops.
Posted 16 May 2008 - 04:59 PM
Posted 16 May 2008 - 06:30 PM
Posted 16 May 2008 - 08:18 PM
Posted 17 May 2008 - 02:03 AM
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that she has a very unusual developmental error, but that it has nothing to do with aging. I suspect that as she gets older, she will look weirder...What are your opinions about this case?Is she really unique?How do you think she will look in 10 years if she's still alive?
Posted 17 May 2008 - 03:23 AM
Posted 17 May 2008 - 03:45 PM
Posted 17 May 2008 - 05:21 PM
Posted 17 May 2008 - 11:44 PM
Posted 18 May 2008 - 11:41 PM
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that she has a very unusual developmental error, but that it has nothing to do with aging. I suspect that as she gets older, she will look weirder...
Posted 19 May 2008 - 01:02 AM
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that she has a very unusual developmental error, but that it has nothing to do with aging. I suspect that as she gets older, she will look weirder...
I'd put my money on this, as well.
Posted 19 May 2008 - 03:34 PM
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that she has a very unusual developmental error, but that it has nothing to do with aging. I suspect that as she gets older, she will look weirder...
I'd put my money on this, as well.
An old baby. Now that would be sadly bizarre.
Posted 19 May 2008 - 04:36 PM
My opinion, for what it's worth, is that she has a very unusual developmental error, but that it has nothing to do with aging. I suspect that as she gets older, she will look weirder...
I'd put my money on this, as well.
Posted 19 May 2008 - 08:30 PM
And she seems unlike Brooke to have suffered some kind of aging...
Posted 19 May 2008 - 09:53 PM
Posted 24 June 2009 - 02:45 AM
Posted 24 June 2009 - 02:59 AM
Posted 25 June 2009 - 05:20 AM
Posted 25 June 2009 - 05:25 AM
Posted 25 June 2009 - 05:55 AM
I don't think so. The girl has a profound developmental disorder. To say she isn't aging is just wrong. See what she looks like in 20 or 30 years, then ask if she isn't aging.
Posted 25 June 2009 - 06:01 AM
Edited by forever freedom, 25 June 2009 - 06:02 AM.
Posted 25 June 2009 - 08:56 AM
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users