About the roughly 200 out of 7000 thing, I was thinking about that too but I realized that for one thing, its way more than the 0 active people I found between 6 years and infinity ago, and has grown from the 20 or so that was around like 4 years ago. So it is growing, but the inverse gap between 7000 and 200 creates an illusion.
Also, a lot of those members would keep participating. If you pmed every one of them I would guess you would get about 3 or 4 thousand responses.
Email incoming members and make them feel comfortable around the people, and welcome and it will increase the numbers of active people.
This lack of numbers you mention is also a good excuse to keep recruiting.
Join me at this recruitment drive. In any case, your right, we need to show some effort. Like some one was saying somewhere else, if we call ourselves an advocacy group, then we need to be seen pulling together for crucial simple stuff like this, or why should we expect any body to take us seriously or even think we really are life extensionists? The management takes on a lot of projects, and we as the membership can, will and are doing our part too. We can make big things happen.
Traclo- About the order of magnitude off the first place project... Oh my god, I didnt consider that until you mentioned it. I was worried there. I went to check it out and I was thinking I was going to see that the first 50 or so projects all had like 50,000 plus votes.
The first place project only has around 2,200. We can match that for sure, with out a doubt. If everybody who reads and hears about this project blogs and bulletins about it we could get way more than that. If everybody thinks their drop of effort wont count for much then we wont get it.
Ill be personally writing about 100 people today. Any more poeple that want to join in on these efforts let me know and Ill tell you more about the meetings. Wednesday and Monday 4pm cst time in the ustream.